Improving heat-related health outcomes in an Urban environment with science-based policy

David Sailor, Marshall Shepherd, Scott Sheridan, Brian Stone, Laurence Kalkstein, Armistead Russell, Jason Vargo, Theresa Andersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use the Northeast US Urban Climate Archipelago as a case study to explore three key limitations of planning and policy initiatives to mitigate extreme urban heat. These limitations are: (1) a lack of understanding of spatial considerations-for example, how nearby urban areas interact, affecting, and being affected by, implementation of such policies; (2) an emphasis on air temperature reduction that neglects assessments of other important meteorological parameters, such as humidity, mixing heights, and urban wind fields; and (3) too narrow of a temporal focus-either time of day, season, or current vs. future climates. Additionally, the absence of a direct policy/planning linkage between heat mitigation goals and actual human health outcomes, in general, leads to solutions that only indirectly address the underlying problems. These issues are explored through several related atmospheric modeling case studies that reveal the complexities of designing effective urban heat mitigation strategies. We conclude with recommendations regarding how policy-makers can optimize the performance of their urban heat mitigation policies and programs. This optimization starts with a thorough understanding of the actual end-point goals of these policies, and concludes with the careful integration of scientific knowledge into the development of location-specific strategies that recognize and address the limitations discussed herein.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1015
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume8
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 12 2016

Fingerprint

heat
Health
science
health
mitigation
climate
Planning
time of day
planning
urban climate
atmospheric modeling
neglect
Atmospheric humidity
urban area
wind field
air
archipelago
humidity
air temperature
policy

Keywords

  • Heat island mitigation
  • Heat-related mortality
  • Urban climate
  • Urban heat island

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Sailor, D., Shepherd, M., Sheridan, S., Stone, B., Kalkstein, L., Russell, A., ... Andersen, T. (2016). Improving heat-related health outcomes in an Urban environment with science-based policy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(10), [1015]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101015

Improving heat-related health outcomes in an Urban environment with science-based policy. / Sailor, David; Shepherd, Marshall; Sheridan, Scott; Stone, Brian; Kalkstein, Laurence; Russell, Armistead; Vargo, Jason; Andersen, Theresa.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 8, No. 10, 1015, 12.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sailor, D, Shepherd, M, Sheridan, S, Stone, B, Kalkstein, L, Russell, A, Vargo, J & Andersen, T 2016, 'Improving heat-related health outcomes in an Urban environment with science-based policy', Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 8, no. 10, 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101015
Sailor, David ; Shepherd, Marshall ; Sheridan, Scott ; Stone, Brian ; Kalkstein, Laurence ; Russell, Armistead ; Vargo, Jason ; Andersen, Theresa. / Improving heat-related health outcomes in an Urban environment with science-based policy. In: Sustainability (Switzerland). 2016 ; Vol. 8, No. 10.
@article{44a40f438c6c4271947ced3c27aa8140,
title = "Improving heat-related health outcomes in an Urban environment with science-based policy",
abstract = "We use the Northeast US Urban Climate Archipelago as a case study to explore three key limitations of planning and policy initiatives to mitigate extreme urban heat. These limitations are: (1) a lack of understanding of spatial considerations-for example, how nearby urban areas interact, affecting, and being affected by, implementation of such policies; (2) an emphasis on air temperature reduction that neglects assessments of other important meteorological parameters, such as humidity, mixing heights, and urban wind fields; and (3) too narrow of a temporal focus-either time of day, season, or current vs. future climates. Additionally, the absence of a direct policy/planning linkage between heat mitigation goals and actual human health outcomes, in general, leads to solutions that only indirectly address the underlying problems. These issues are explored through several related atmospheric modeling case studies that reveal the complexities of designing effective urban heat mitigation strategies. We conclude with recommendations regarding how policy-makers can optimize the performance of their urban heat mitigation policies and programs. This optimization starts with a thorough understanding of the actual end-point goals of these policies, and concludes with the careful integration of scientific knowledge into the development of location-specific strategies that recognize and address the limitations discussed herein.",
keywords = "Heat island mitigation, Heat-related mortality, Urban climate, Urban heat island",
author = "David Sailor and Marshall Shepherd and Scott Sheridan and Brian Stone and Laurence Kalkstein and Armistead Russell and Jason Vargo and Theresa Andersen",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "12",
doi = "10.3390/su8101015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving heat-related health outcomes in an Urban environment with science-based policy

AU - Sailor, David

AU - Shepherd, Marshall

AU - Sheridan, Scott

AU - Stone, Brian

AU - Kalkstein, Laurence

AU - Russell, Armistead

AU - Vargo, Jason

AU - Andersen, Theresa

PY - 2016/10/12

Y1 - 2016/10/12

N2 - We use the Northeast US Urban Climate Archipelago as a case study to explore three key limitations of planning and policy initiatives to mitigate extreme urban heat. These limitations are: (1) a lack of understanding of spatial considerations-for example, how nearby urban areas interact, affecting, and being affected by, implementation of such policies; (2) an emphasis on air temperature reduction that neglects assessments of other important meteorological parameters, such as humidity, mixing heights, and urban wind fields; and (3) too narrow of a temporal focus-either time of day, season, or current vs. future climates. Additionally, the absence of a direct policy/planning linkage between heat mitigation goals and actual human health outcomes, in general, leads to solutions that only indirectly address the underlying problems. These issues are explored through several related atmospheric modeling case studies that reveal the complexities of designing effective urban heat mitigation strategies. We conclude with recommendations regarding how policy-makers can optimize the performance of their urban heat mitigation policies and programs. This optimization starts with a thorough understanding of the actual end-point goals of these policies, and concludes with the careful integration of scientific knowledge into the development of location-specific strategies that recognize and address the limitations discussed herein.

AB - We use the Northeast US Urban Climate Archipelago as a case study to explore three key limitations of planning and policy initiatives to mitigate extreme urban heat. These limitations are: (1) a lack of understanding of spatial considerations-for example, how nearby urban areas interact, affecting, and being affected by, implementation of such policies; (2) an emphasis on air temperature reduction that neglects assessments of other important meteorological parameters, such as humidity, mixing heights, and urban wind fields; and (3) too narrow of a temporal focus-either time of day, season, or current vs. future climates. Additionally, the absence of a direct policy/planning linkage between heat mitigation goals and actual human health outcomes, in general, leads to solutions that only indirectly address the underlying problems. These issues are explored through several related atmospheric modeling case studies that reveal the complexities of designing effective urban heat mitigation strategies. We conclude with recommendations regarding how policy-makers can optimize the performance of their urban heat mitigation policies and programs. This optimization starts with a thorough understanding of the actual end-point goals of these policies, and concludes with the careful integration of scientific knowledge into the development of location-specific strategies that recognize and address the limitations discussed herein.

KW - Heat island mitigation

KW - Heat-related mortality

KW - Urban climate

KW - Urban heat island

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994908529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994908529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su8101015

DO - 10.3390/su8101015

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 10

M1 - 1015

ER -