Improved prediction of gestational age from fetal head measurements

P. M. Doubilet, Robert Greenes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gestational age estimation based on biparietal diameter alone was compared with three approaches to age prediction that consider head shape: area-corrected biparietal diameter, circumference-corrected biparietal diameter, and head circumference. The analysis was based on 67 fetuses (13-41 weeks) in whom age was known with a high degree of accuracy, using a crown-rump length measurement from a prior first trimester sonographic examination. The three methods that consider head shape are more precise than biparietal diameter alone (p < 0.05 for second trimester cases, less significantly demonstrated for third trimester cases). While the three appear to be equal to one another in accuracy, area correction may be the preferred approach based on theoretical grounds and on convenience. It is easy and can be used in conjunction with any formula (or table) now applied to biparietal diameter alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)797-800
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume142
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gestational Age
Head
Crown-Rump Length
Third Pregnancy Trimester
Second Pregnancy Trimester
First Pregnancy Trimester
Fetus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Improved prediction of gestational age from fetal head measurements. / Doubilet, P. M.; Greenes, Robert.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 142, No. 4, 1984, p. 797-800.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d2c8ccd4bf24b008d3bc8944b99e5d5,
title = "Improved prediction of gestational age from fetal head measurements",
abstract = "Gestational age estimation based on biparietal diameter alone was compared with three approaches to age prediction that consider head shape: area-corrected biparietal diameter, circumference-corrected biparietal diameter, and head circumference. The analysis was based on 67 fetuses (13-41 weeks) in whom age was known with a high degree of accuracy, using a crown-rump length measurement from a prior first trimester sonographic examination. The three methods that consider head shape are more precise than biparietal diameter alone (p < 0.05 for second trimester cases, less significantly demonstrated for third trimester cases). While the three appear to be equal to one another in accuracy, area correction may be the preferred approach based on theoretical grounds and on convenience. It is easy and can be used in conjunction with any formula (or table) now applied to biparietal diameter alone.",
author = "Doubilet, {P. M.} and Robert Greenes",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "797--800",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved prediction of gestational age from fetal head measurements

AU - Doubilet, P. M.

AU - Greenes, Robert

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Gestational age estimation based on biparietal diameter alone was compared with three approaches to age prediction that consider head shape: area-corrected biparietal diameter, circumference-corrected biparietal diameter, and head circumference. The analysis was based on 67 fetuses (13-41 weeks) in whom age was known with a high degree of accuracy, using a crown-rump length measurement from a prior first trimester sonographic examination. The three methods that consider head shape are more precise than biparietal diameter alone (p < 0.05 for second trimester cases, less significantly demonstrated for third trimester cases). While the three appear to be equal to one another in accuracy, area correction may be the preferred approach based on theoretical grounds and on convenience. It is easy and can be used in conjunction with any formula (or table) now applied to biparietal diameter alone.

AB - Gestational age estimation based on biparietal diameter alone was compared with three approaches to age prediction that consider head shape: area-corrected biparietal diameter, circumference-corrected biparietal diameter, and head circumference. The analysis was based on 67 fetuses (13-41 weeks) in whom age was known with a high degree of accuracy, using a crown-rump length measurement from a prior first trimester sonographic examination. The three methods that consider head shape are more precise than biparietal diameter alone (p < 0.05 for second trimester cases, less significantly demonstrated for third trimester cases). While the three appear to be equal to one another in accuracy, area correction may be the preferred approach based on theoretical grounds and on convenience. It is easy and can be used in conjunction with any formula (or table) now applied to biparietal diameter alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021329413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021329413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6608242

AN - SCOPUS:0021329413

VL - 142

SP - 797

EP - 800

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 4

ER -