Abstract

It is shown using full-wave simulations that several of the conventional assumptions made for extracting permeability data from a microstrip permeameter are not justified. In particular, the proportionality between the measured effective permeability in the device and the true permeability of the film is not a constant. It is a function of the permeability of the film, its geometry and the dimensions of the microstrip permeameter. A model exploiting the analyticity of the function relating effective to true permeability is used to derive this proportionality function for our device and the results are confirmed using full-wave simulations. The error incurred by not using this method and employing a reference sample for calibration or by using saturation magnetization "Ms" and anisotropy field "Ha" is shown to be anywhere between 5% and 40% and possibly even more. Our measurement set up is capable of measuring films as thin as 300 nm with a relative permeability as low as 10.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number033906
JournalJournal of Applied Physics
Volume113
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 21 2013

Fingerprint

permeability
thin films
simulation
saturation
magnetization
anisotropy
geometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Improved accuracy thin film permeability extraction for a microstrip permeameter. / Sebastian, Tom; Clavijo, Sergio A.; Diaz, Rodolfo.

In: Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 113, No. 3, 033906, 21.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dfd05e6b27e24f949788afce3680fd82,
title = "Improved accuracy thin film permeability extraction for a microstrip permeameter",
abstract = "It is shown using full-wave simulations that several of the conventional assumptions made for extracting permeability data from a microstrip permeameter are not justified. In particular, the proportionality between the measured effective permeability in the device and the true permeability of the film is not a constant. It is a function of the permeability of the film, its geometry and the dimensions of the microstrip permeameter. A model exploiting the analyticity of the function relating effective to true permeability is used to derive this proportionality function for our device and the results are confirmed using full-wave simulations. The error incurred by not using this method and employing a reference sample for calibration or by using saturation magnetization {"}Ms{"} and anisotropy field {"}Ha{"} is shown to be anywhere between 5{\%} and 40{\%} and possibly even more. Our measurement set up is capable of measuring films as thin as 300 nm with a relative permeability as low as 10.",
author = "Tom Sebastian and Clavijo, {Sergio A.} and Rodolfo Diaz",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1063/1.4776715",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physics",
issn = "0021-8979",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved accuracy thin film permeability extraction for a microstrip permeameter

AU - Sebastian, Tom

AU - Clavijo, Sergio A.

AU - Diaz, Rodolfo

PY - 2013/1/21

Y1 - 2013/1/21

N2 - It is shown using full-wave simulations that several of the conventional assumptions made for extracting permeability data from a microstrip permeameter are not justified. In particular, the proportionality between the measured effective permeability in the device and the true permeability of the film is not a constant. It is a function of the permeability of the film, its geometry and the dimensions of the microstrip permeameter. A model exploiting the analyticity of the function relating effective to true permeability is used to derive this proportionality function for our device and the results are confirmed using full-wave simulations. The error incurred by not using this method and employing a reference sample for calibration or by using saturation magnetization "Ms" and anisotropy field "Ha" is shown to be anywhere between 5% and 40% and possibly even more. Our measurement set up is capable of measuring films as thin as 300 nm with a relative permeability as low as 10.

AB - It is shown using full-wave simulations that several of the conventional assumptions made for extracting permeability data from a microstrip permeameter are not justified. In particular, the proportionality between the measured effective permeability in the device and the true permeability of the film is not a constant. It is a function of the permeability of the film, its geometry and the dimensions of the microstrip permeameter. A model exploiting the analyticity of the function relating effective to true permeability is used to derive this proportionality function for our device and the results are confirmed using full-wave simulations. The error incurred by not using this method and employing a reference sample for calibration or by using saturation magnetization "Ms" and anisotropy field "Ha" is shown to be anywhere between 5% and 40% and possibly even more. Our measurement set up is capable of measuring films as thin as 300 nm with a relative permeability as low as 10.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872846843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872846843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.4776715

DO - 10.1063/1.4776715

M3 - Article

VL - 113

JO - Journal of Applied Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Physics

SN - 0021-8979

IS - 3

M1 - 033906

ER -