Implications of sediment-flux-dependent river incision models for landscape evolution

Kelin Whipple, Gregory E. Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

395 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Developing a quantitative understanding of the factors that control the rate of river incision into bedrock is critical to studies of landscape evolution and the linkages between climate, erosion, and tectonics. Current models of long-term river network incision differ significantly in their treatment of the role of sediment flux. We analyze the implications of various sediment-flux-dependent incision models for large-scale topography, in an attempt (1) to identify quantifiable and diagnostic differences between models that could be detected from topographic data or from the transient responses of perturbed systems and (2) to explain the apparent ubiquity of mixed bedrock-alluvial channels in active orogens. Although certain forms of the various models can be discarded as inconsistent with morphological data, we find that the relative intrinsic concavity indices of detachment- and transport-limited systems (defined herein) largely dictate whether the various models can be tied to distinctive steady state morphologies. Preliminary data suggest that no such diagnostic differences may exist, and other methods must be developed to test models. Accordingly, we develop and explore differences in the scaling behavior of topographic relief and the extent of detachment- versus transport-limited channels as a function of rock uplift rate that may allow discrimination among various models. Further, we explore potentially diagnostic differences in the rates and patterns of transient channel response to changes in rock uplift rate. In addition to general differences between detachment- and transport-limited systems our analysis identifies an interesting hysteresis in landscape evolution: "hybrid" channels at the threshold between detachment- and transport-limited conditions are expected to act as detachment-limited systems in response to an increase in rock uplift rate (or base level fall) and as transport-limited systems in response to a decrease in rock uplift rate, especially during postorogenic topographic decline. The analyses presented set the stage for field studies designed to test quantitatively the various river incision models that have been proposed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Volume107
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

landscape evolution
rivers
Sediments
sediments
Rivers
Fluxes
detachment
river
sediment
uplift
Rocks
rocks
bedrock
rock
concavity
hysteresis
systems analysis
transient response
model test
Tectonics

Keywords

  • Bedrock channels
  • Erosion
  • Relief
  • Sediment-flux
  • Tectonic geomorphology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Oceanography

Cite this

Implications of sediment-flux-dependent river incision models for landscape evolution. / Whipple, Kelin; Tucker, Gregory E.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 107, No. 2, 2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e2fedf0b7ea944f6b39504d10bc623cd,
title = "Implications of sediment-flux-dependent river incision models for landscape evolution",
abstract = "Developing a quantitative understanding of the factors that control the rate of river incision into bedrock is critical to studies of landscape evolution and the linkages between climate, erosion, and tectonics. Current models of long-term river network incision differ significantly in their treatment of the role of sediment flux. We analyze the implications of various sediment-flux-dependent incision models for large-scale topography, in an attempt (1) to identify quantifiable and diagnostic differences between models that could be detected from topographic data or from the transient responses of perturbed systems and (2) to explain the apparent ubiquity of mixed bedrock-alluvial channels in active orogens. Although certain forms of the various models can be discarded as inconsistent with morphological data, we find that the relative intrinsic concavity indices of detachment- and transport-limited systems (defined herein) largely dictate whether the various models can be tied to distinctive steady state morphologies. Preliminary data suggest that no such diagnostic differences may exist, and other methods must be developed to test models. Accordingly, we develop and explore differences in the scaling behavior of topographic relief and the extent of detachment- versus transport-limited channels as a function of rock uplift rate that may allow discrimination among various models. Further, we explore potentially diagnostic differences in the rates and patterns of transient channel response to changes in rock uplift rate. In addition to general differences between detachment- and transport-limited systems our analysis identifies an interesting hysteresis in landscape evolution: {"}hybrid{"} channels at the threshold between detachment- and transport-limited conditions are expected to act as detachment-limited systems in response to an increase in rock uplift rate (or base level fall) and as transport-limited systems in response to a decrease in rock uplift rate, especially during postorogenic topographic decline. The analyses presented set the stage for field studies designed to test quantitatively the various river incision models that have been proposed.",
keywords = "Bedrock channels, Erosion, Relief, Sediment-flux, Tectonic geomorphology",
author = "Kelin Whipple and Tucker, {Gregory E.}",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres",
issn = "2169-897X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implications of sediment-flux-dependent river incision models for landscape evolution

AU - Whipple, Kelin

AU - Tucker, Gregory E.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Developing a quantitative understanding of the factors that control the rate of river incision into bedrock is critical to studies of landscape evolution and the linkages between climate, erosion, and tectonics. Current models of long-term river network incision differ significantly in their treatment of the role of sediment flux. We analyze the implications of various sediment-flux-dependent incision models for large-scale topography, in an attempt (1) to identify quantifiable and diagnostic differences between models that could be detected from topographic data or from the transient responses of perturbed systems and (2) to explain the apparent ubiquity of mixed bedrock-alluvial channels in active orogens. Although certain forms of the various models can be discarded as inconsistent with morphological data, we find that the relative intrinsic concavity indices of detachment- and transport-limited systems (defined herein) largely dictate whether the various models can be tied to distinctive steady state morphologies. Preliminary data suggest that no such diagnostic differences may exist, and other methods must be developed to test models. Accordingly, we develop and explore differences in the scaling behavior of topographic relief and the extent of detachment- versus transport-limited channels as a function of rock uplift rate that may allow discrimination among various models. Further, we explore potentially diagnostic differences in the rates and patterns of transient channel response to changes in rock uplift rate. In addition to general differences between detachment- and transport-limited systems our analysis identifies an interesting hysteresis in landscape evolution: "hybrid" channels at the threshold between detachment- and transport-limited conditions are expected to act as detachment-limited systems in response to an increase in rock uplift rate (or base level fall) and as transport-limited systems in response to a decrease in rock uplift rate, especially during postorogenic topographic decline. The analyses presented set the stage for field studies designed to test quantitatively the various river incision models that have been proposed.

AB - Developing a quantitative understanding of the factors that control the rate of river incision into bedrock is critical to studies of landscape evolution and the linkages between climate, erosion, and tectonics. Current models of long-term river network incision differ significantly in their treatment of the role of sediment flux. We analyze the implications of various sediment-flux-dependent incision models for large-scale topography, in an attempt (1) to identify quantifiable and diagnostic differences between models that could be detected from topographic data or from the transient responses of perturbed systems and (2) to explain the apparent ubiquity of mixed bedrock-alluvial channels in active orogens. Although certain forms of the various models can be discarded as inconsistent with morphological data, we find that the relative intrinsic concavity indices of detachment- and transport-limited systems (defined herein) largely dictate whether the various models can be tied to distinctive steady state morphologies. Preliminary data suggest that no such diagnostic differences may exist, and other methods must be developed to test models. Accordingly, we develop and explore differences in the scaling behavior of topographic relief and the extent of detachment- versus transport-limited channels as a function of rock uplift rate that may allow discrimination among various models. Further, we explore potentially diagnostic differences in the rates and patterns of transient channel response to changes in rock uplift rate. In addition to general differences between detachment- and transport-limited systems our analysis identifies an interesting hysteresis in landscape evolution: "hybrid" channels at the threshold between detachment- and transport-limited conditions are expected to act as detachment-limited systems in response to an increase in rock uplift rate (or base level fall) and as transport-limited systems in response to a decrease in rock uplift rate, especially during postorogenic topographic decline. The analyses presented set the stage for field studies designed to test quantitatively the various river incision models that have been proposed.

KW - Bedrock channels

KW - Erosion

KW - Relief

KW - Sediment-flux

KW - Tectonic geomorphology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036111119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036111119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 107

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

SN - 2169-897X

IS - 2

ER -