Impact of the 2014 Suspension Agreement on sugar between the United States and Mexico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In December 2014, the U.S. and Mexico agreed to a suspension agreement that set a $22.25/cwt import price floor on U.S. sugar imports from Mexico. A partial equilibrium trade model was developed to estimate the economic impact the agreement would have had if it had been in effect from 2008 to 2014. In years when the price floor would have been binding, on average, U.S. producers would have gained $138 million and Mexican producers would have lost $218 million. However, total Mexican welfare would have actually increased by $11.5 million. Furthermore, the average price floor that would have maximized total Mexican welfare over that period is $22.76/cwt. Also, under certain supply and demand elasticity conditions, the average price floor that would have maximized joint U.S. and Mexican producer welfare over that period is $21.91/cwt. The latter two estimates are both close to the actual price floor agreed to in the 2014 Suspension Agreement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAgricultural Economics (United Kingdom)
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Mexico
sugars
imports
supply elasticities
demand elasticities
supply balance
economic impact

Keywords

  • C54
  • D60
  • F14
  • Mexico
  • Price floor
  • Price undertaking
  • Q17
  • Q18
  • Sugar
  • Suspension agreement
  • Tariff-rate quota

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{7532455796744e498ddb83597b7c9bc3,
title = "Impact of the 2014 Suspension Agreement on sugar between the United States and Mexico",
abstract = "In December 2014, the U.S. and Mexico agreed to a suspension agreement that set a $22.25/cwt import price floor on U.S. sugar imports from Mexico. A partial equilibrium trade model was developed to estimate the economic impact the agreement would have had if it had been in effect from 2008 to 2014. In years when the price floor would have been binding, on average, U.S. producers would have gained $138 million and Mexican producers would have lost $218 million. However, total Mexican welfare would have actually increased by $11.5 million. Furthermore, the average price floor that would have maximized total Mexican welfare over that period is $22.76/cwt. Also, under certain supply and demand elasticity conditions, the average price floor that would have maximized joint U.S. and Mexican producer welfare over that period is $21.91/cwt. The latter two estimates are both close to the actual price floor agreed to in the 2014 Suspension Agreement.",
keywords = "C54, D60, F14, Mexico, Price floor, Price undertaking, Q17, Q18, Sugar, Suspension agreement, Tariff-rate quota",
author = "Troy Schmitz",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/agec.12395",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)",
issn = "0169-5150",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of the 2014 Suspension Agreement on sugar between the United States and Mexico

AU - Schmitz, Troy

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - In December 2014, the U.S. and Mexico agreed to a suspension agreement that set a $22.25/cwt import price floor on U.S. sugar imports from Mexico. A partial equilibrium trade model was developed to estimate the economic impact the agreement would have had if it had been in effect from 2008 to 2014. In years when the price floor would have been binding, on average, U.S. producers would have gained $138 million and Mexican producers would have lost $218 million. However, total Mexican welfare would have actually increased by $11.5 million. Furthermore, the average price floor that would have maximized total Mexican welfare over that period is $22.76/cwt. Also, under certain supply and demand elasticity conditions, the average price floor that would have maximized joint U.S. and Mexican producer welfare over that period is $21.91/cwt. The latter two estimates are both close to the actual price floor agreed to in the 2014 Suspension Agreement.

AB - In December 2014, the U.S. and Mexico agreed to a suspension agreement that set a $22.25/cwt import price floor on U.S. sugar imports from Mexico. A partial equilibrium trade model was developed to estimate the economic impact the agreement would have had if it had been in effect from 2008 to 2014. In years when the price floor would have been binding, on average, U.S. producers would have gained $138 million and Mexican producers would have lost $218 million. However, total Mexican welfare would have actually increased by $11.5 million. Furthermore, the average price floor that would have maximized total Mexican welfare over that period is $22.76/cwt. Also, under certain supply and demand elasticity conditions, the average price floor that would have maximized joint U.S. and Mexican producer welfare over that period is $21.91/cwt. The latter two estimates are both close to the actual price floor agreed to in the 2014 Suspension Agreement.

KW - C54

KW - D60

KW - F14

KW - Mexico

KW - Price floor

KW - Price undertaking

KW - Q17

KW - Q18

KW - Sugar

KW - Suspension agreement

KW - Tariff-rate quota

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035026283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035026283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/agec.12395

DO - 10.1111/agec.12395

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85035026283

JO - Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

JF - Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

SN - 0169-5150

ER -