Impact of San Francisco's toy ordinance on restaurants and children's food purchases, 2011-2012

Jennifer J. Otten, Brian E. Saelens, Kristopher I. Kapphahn, Eric B. Hekler, Matthew Buman, Benjamin A. Goldstein, Rebecca A. Krukowski, Laura S. O'Donohue, Christopher D. Gardner, Abby C. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In 2011, San Francisco passed the first citywide ordinance to improve the nutritional standards of children's meals sold at restaurants by preventing the giving away of free toys or other incentives with meals unless nutritional criteria were met. This study examined the impact of the Healthy Food Incentives Ordinance at ordinance-affected restaurants on restaurant response (eg, toy-distribution practices, change in children's menus), and the energy and nutrient content of all orders and children's-meal-only orders purchased for children aged 0 through 12 years.

METHODS: Restaurant responses were examined from January 2010 through March 2012. Parent-caregiver/child dyads (n = 762) who were restaurant customers were surveyed at 2 points before and 1 seasonally matched point after ordinance enactment at Chain A and B restaurants (n = 30) in 2011 and 2012.

RESULTS: Both restaurant chains responded to the ordinance by selling toys separately from children's meals, but neither changed their menus to meet ordinance-specified nutrition criteria. Among children for whom children's meals were purchased, significant decreases in kilocalories, sodium, and fat per order were likely due to changes in children's side dishes and beverages at Chain A.

CONCLUSION: Although the changes at Chain A did not appear to be directly in response to the ordinance, the transition to a more healthful beverage and default side dish was consistent with the intent of the ordinance. Study results underscore the importance of policy wording, support the concept that more healthful defaults may be a powerful approach for improving dietary intake, and suggest that public policies may contribute to positive restaurant changes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E122
JournalPreventing chronic disease
Volume11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Restaurants
Play and Playthings
San Francisco
Food
Meals
Beverages
Motivation
Public Policy
Caregivers
Sodium
Fats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Otten, J. J., Saelens, B. E., Kapphahn, K. I., Hekler, E. B., Buman, M., Goldstein, B. A., ... King, A. C. (2014). Impact of San Francisco's toy ordinance on restaurants and children's food purchases, 2011-2012. Preventing chronic disease, 11, E122. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140026

Impact of San Francisco's toy ordinance on restaurants and children's food purchases, 2011-2012. / Otten, Jennifer J.; Saelens, Brian E.; Kapphahn, Kristopher I.; Hekler, Eric B.; Buman, Matthew; Goldstein, Benjamin A.; Krukowski, Rebecca A.; O'Donohue, Laura S.; Gardner, Christopher D.; King, Abby C.

In: Preventing chronic disease, Vol. 11, 2014, p. E122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Otten, JJ, Saelens, BE, Kapphahn, KI, Hekler, EB, Buman, M, Goldstein, BA, Krukowski, RA, O'Donohue, LS, Gardner, CD & King, AC 2014, 'Impact of San Francisco's toy ordinance on restaurants and children's food purchases, 2011-2012', Preventing chronic disease, vol. 11, pp. E122. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140026
Otten, Jennifer J. ; Saelens, Brian E. ; Kapphahn, Kristopher I. ; Hekler, Eric B. ; Buman, Matthew ; Goldstein, Benjamin A. ; Krukowski, Rebecca A. ; O'Donohue, Laura S. ; Gardner, Christopher D. ; King, Abby C. / Impact of San Francisco's toy ordinance on restaurants and children's food purchases, 2011-2012. In: Preventing chronic disease. 2014 ; Vol. 11. pp. E122.
@article{551d56e456044d659e84dc0fe6c32367,
title = "Impact of San Francisco's toy ordinance on restaurants and children's food purchases, 2011-2012",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: In 2011, San Francisco passed the first citywide ordinance to improve the nutritional standards of children's meals sold at restaurants by preventing the giving away of free toys or other incentives with meals unless nutritional criteria were met. This study examined the impact of the Healthy Food Incentives Ordinance at ordinance-affected restaurants on restaurant response (eg, toy-distribution practices, change in children's menus), and the energy and nutrient content of all orders and children's-meal-only orders purchased for children aged 0 through 12 years.METHODS: Restaurant responses were examined from January 2010 through March 2012. Parent-caregiver/child dyads (n = 762) who were restaurant customers were surveyed at 2 points before and 1 seasonally matched point after ordinance enactment at Chain A and B restaurants (n = 30) in 2011 and 2012.RESULTS: Both restaurant chains responded to the ordinance by selling toys separately from children's meals, but neither changed their menus to meet ordinance-specified nutrition criteria. Among children for whom children's meals were purchased, significant decreases in kilocalories, sodium, and fat per order were likely due to changes in children's side dishes and beverages at Chain A.CONCLUSION: Although the changes at Chain A did not appear to be directly in response to the ordinance, the transition to a more healthful beverage and default side dish was consistent with the intent of the ordinance. Study results underscore the importance of policy wording, support the concept that more healthful defaults may be a powerful approach for improving dietary intake, and suggest that public policies may contribute to positive restaurant changes.",
author = "Otten, {Jennifer J.} and Saelens, {Brian E.} and Kapphahn, {Kristopher I.} and Hekler, {Eric B.} and Matthew Buman and Goldstein, {Benjamin A.} and Krukowski, {Rebecca A.} and O'Donohue, {Laura S.} and Gardner, {Christopher D.} and King, {Abby C.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5888/pcd11.140026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "E122",
journal = "Preventing chronic disease",
issn = "1545-1151",
publisher = "U.S. Department of Health and Human Services",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of San Francisco's toy ordinance on restaurants and children's food purchases, 2011-2012

AU - Otten, Jennifer J.

AU - Saelens, Brian E.

AU - Kapphahn, Kristopher I.

AU - Hekler, Eric B.

AU - Buman, Matthew

AU - Goldstein, Benjamin A.

AU - Krukowski, Rebecca A.

AU - O'Donohue, Laura S.

AU - Gardner, Christopher D.

AU - King, Abby C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - INTRODUCTION: In 2011, San Francisco passed the first citywide ordinance to improve the nutritional standards of children's meals sold at restaurants by preventing the giving away of free toys or other incentives with meals unless nutritional criteria were met. This study examined the impact of the Healthy Food Incentives Ordinance at ordinance-affected restaurants on restaurant response (eg, toy-distribution practices, change in children's menus), and the energy and nutrient content of all orders and children's-meal-only orders purchased for children aged 0 through 12 years.METHODS: Restaurant responses were examined from January 2010 through March 2012. Parent-caregiver/child dyads (n = 762) who were restaurant customers were surveyed at 2 points before and 1 seasonally matched point after ordinance enactment at Chain A and B restaurants (n = 30) in 2011 and 2012.RESULTS: Both restaurant chains responded to the ordinance by selling toys separately from children's meals, but neither changed their menus to meet ordinance-specified nutrition criteria. Among children for whom children's meals were purchased, significant decreases in kilocalories, sodium, and fat per order were likely due to changes in children's side dishes and beverages at Chain A.CONCLUSION: Although the changes at Chain A did not appear to be directly in response to the ordinance, the transition to a more healthful beverage and default side dish was consistent with the intent of the ordinance. Study results underscore the importance of policy wording, support the concept that more healthful defaults may be a powerful approach for improving dietary intake, and suggest that public policies may contribute to positive restaurant changes.

AB - INTRODUCTION: In 2011, San Francisco passed the first citywide ordinance to improve the nutritional standards of children's meals sold at restaurants by preventing the giving away of free toys or other incentives with meals unless nutritional criteria were met. This study examined the impact of the Healthy Food Incentives Ordinance at ordinance-affected restaurants on restaurant response (eg, toy-distribution practices, change in children's menus), and the energy and nutrient content of all orders and children's-meal-only orders purchased for children aged 0 through 12 years.METHODS: Restaurant responses were examined from January 2010 through March 2012. Parent-caregiver/child dyads (n = 762) who were restaurant customers were surveyed at 2 points before and 1 seasonally matched point after ordinance enactment at Chain A and B restaurants (n = 30) in 2011 and 2012.RESULTS: Both restaurant chains responded to the ordinance by selling toys separately from children's meals, but neither changed their menus to meet ordinance-specified nutrition criteria. Among children for whom children's meals were purchased, significant decreases in kilocalories, sodium, and fat per order were likely due to changes in children's side dishes and beverages at Chain A.CONCLUSION: Although the changes at Chain A did not appear to be directly in response to the ordinance, the transition to a more healthful beverage and default side dish was consistent with the intent of the ordinance. Study results underscore the importance of policy wording, support the concept that more healthful defaults may be a powerful approach for improving dietary intake, and suggest that public policies may contribute to positive restaurant changes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939452611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939452611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5888/pcd11.140026

DO - 10.5888/pcd11.140026

M3 - Article

C2 - 25032837

AN - SCOPUS:84939452611

VL - 11

SP - E122

JO - Preventing chronic disease

JF - Preventing chronic disease

SN - 1545-1151

ER -