Impact of crew scheduling on project performance

Awad S. Hanna, Aviad Shapira, Mounir El Asmar, Craig S. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contractors have responded to the growing pressure from owners to shorten project duration by employing a variety of crew-scheduling techniques. Unfortunately, only a limited knowledge base exists for determining the impact of different crew schedules on project performance in terms of cost, duration, productivity, and safety. Standard crew schedules include those that require crews to work 40 h per week, including five 8-h days, four 10-h days, or a second shift. Overtime schedules are also common, which require crews to work additional hours beyond the standard 40 h per week. These overtime schedules include five 9-h days, six 8-h days, or five 10-h days. In addition to the standard and overtime schedules, several other crew-scheduling techniques have been used successfully by contractors. This paper presents the results of a study on the impact of crew-scheduling techniques on overall project performance. The paper identifies the proper application and conditions for successful use of various crew-scheduling techniques and provides a comprehensive comparison that outlines a variety of crew-scheduling options, along with their impact on labor efficiency, project duration, worker safety, and project cost. Contractors can use the results to aid them in the selection of a scheduling technique to best meet the specific requirements of a project.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-44
Number of pages10
JournalPractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

Scheduling
Contractors
Costs
Productivity
Personnel
Safety

Keywords

  • Construction
  • Crew scheduling
  • Productivity
  • Safety
  • Schedule compression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Impact of crew scheduling on project performance. / Hanna, Awad S.; Shapira, Aviad; El Asmar, Mounir; Taylor, Craig S.

In: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.02.2013, p. 35-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hanna, Awad S. ; Shapira, Aviad ; El Asmar, Mounir ; Taylor, Craig S. / Impact of crew scheduling on project performance. In: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. 2013 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 35-44.
@article{63a6f2837c454556afeeae1562c81cef,
title = "Impact of crew scheduling on project performance",
abstract = "Contractors have responded to the growing pressure from owners to shorten project duration by employing a variety of crew-scheduling techniques. Unfortunately, only a limited knowledge base exists for determining the impact of different crew schedules on project performance in terms of cost, duration, productivity, and safety. Standard crew schedules include those that require crews to work 40 h per week, including five 8-h days, four 10-h days, or a second shift. Overtime schedules are also common, which require crews to work additional hours beyond the standard 40 h per week. These overtime schedules include five 9-h days, six 8-h days, or five 10-h days. In addition to the standard and overtime schedules, several other crew-scheduling techniques have been used successfully by contractors. This paper presents the results of a study on the impact of crew-scheduling techniques on overall project performance. The paper identifies the proper application and conditions for successful use of various crew-scheduling techniques and provides a comprehensive comparison that outlines a variety of crew-scheduling options, along with their impact on labor efficiency, project duration, worker safety, and project cost. Contractors can use the results to aid them in the selection of a scheduling technique to best meet the specific requirements of a project.",
keywords = "Construction, Crew scheduling, Productivity, Safety, Schedule compression",
author = "Hanna, {Awad S.} and Aviad Shapira and {El Asmar}, Mounir and Taylor, {Craig S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "35--44",
journal = "Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction",
issn = "1084-0680",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of crew scheduling on project performance

AU - Hanna, Awad S.

AU - Shapira, Aviad

AU - El Asmar, Mounir

AU - Taylor, Craig S.

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Contractors have responded to the growing pressure from owners to shorten project duration by employing a variety of crew-scheduling techniques. Unfortunately, only a limited knowledge base exists for determining the impact of different crew schedules on project performance in terms of cost, duration, productivity, and safety. Standard crew schedules include those that require crews to work 40 h per week, including five 8-h days, four 10-h days, or a second shift. Overtime schedules are also common, which require crews to work additional hours beyond the standard 40 h per week. These overtime schedules include five 9-h days, six 8-h days, or five 10-h days. In addition to the standard and overtime schedules, several other crew-scheduling techniques have been used successfully by contractors. This paper presents the results of a study on the impact of crew-scheduling techniques on overall project performance. The paper identifies the proper application and conditions for successful use of various crew-scheduling techniques and provides a comprehensive comparison that outlines a variety of crew-scheduling options, along with their impact on labor efficiency, project duration, worker safety, and project cost. Contractors can use the results to aid them in the selection of a scheduling technique to best meet the specific requirements of a project.

AB - Contractors have responded to the growing pressure from owners to shorten project duration by employing a variety of crew-scheduling techniques. Unfortunately, only a limited knowledge base exists for determining the impact of different crew schedules on project performance in terms of cost, duration, productivity, and safety. Standard crew schedules include those that require crews to work 40 h per week, including five 8-h days, four 10-h days, or a second shift. Overtime schedules are also common, which require crews to work additional hours beyond the standard 40 h per week. These overtime schedules include five 9-h days, six 8-h days, or five 10-h days. In addition to the standard and overtime schedules, several other crew-scheduling techniques have been used successfully by contractors. This paper presents the results of a study on the impact of crew-scheduling techniques on overall project performance. The paper identifies the proper application and conditions for successful use of various crew-scheduling techniques and provides a comprehensive comparison that outlines a variety of crew-scheduling options, along with their impact on labor efficiency, project duration, worker safety, and project cost. Contractors can use the results to aid them in the selection of a scheduling technique to best meet the specific requirements of a project.

KW - Construction

KW - Crew scheduling

KW - Productivity

KW - Safety

KW - Schedule compression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873421411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873421411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000121

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000121

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873421411

VL - 18

SP - 35

EP - 44

JO - Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction

JF - Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction

SN - 1084-0680

IS - 1

ER -