Impact of bureaucracy on project change - A framework for evaluation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Changes in construction projects represent risks for all project stakeholders, but without uniform and reliable metrics to record and compare, changes are subject to opinions and cannot be easily analyzed. This paper proposes a framework for the evaluation of the impacts of an environment on project change. Bureaucratic and Less-Bureaucratic environments are used as case studies for the application of this framework. The impact of the environment on project change is calculated based on 1) Dominant metrics and KPI; 2) Clear classifications of the sources of change; and 3) Sound analyses regarding the recorded outcomes. This paper illustrated the difference between these two environments by comparing their rates of change and suggested areas of improvement. The four (4) metrics to quantify change were: 1) Cost; 2) Schedule; 3) Client satisfaction or quality rates; and 4) Quantities of types of changes; and the four (4) metrics to classify the source of change were: 1) Client; 2) Contractor; 3) Designer; and 4) Unforeseen. The results indicated that there was a greater percentage differential between schedule delays versus cost impacts of the two environments. Additionally, the client was the greatest source of change, specifically schedule changes in Less-Bureaucratic environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCOBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference
Pages245-255
Number of pages11
StatePublished - 2011
EventRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors International Research Conference, COBRA 2011 - Salford, United Kingdom
Duration: Sep 12 2011Sep 13 2011

Other

OtherRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors International Research Conference, COBRA 2011
CountryUnited Kingdom
CitySalford
Period9/12/119/13/11

Fingerprint

Contractors
Costs
Acoustic waves

Keywords

  • Bureaucracy
  • Environmental impact
  • Performance
  • Performance metrics
  • Project change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Sullivan, K., Kashiwagi, D., & Hurtado, K. (2011). Impact of bureaucracy on project change - A framework for evaluation. In COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference (pp. 245-255)

Impact of bureaucracy on project change - A framework for evaluation. / Sullivan, Kenneth; Kashiwagi, Dean; Hurtado, Kristen.

COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference. 2011. p. 245-255.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Sullivan, K, Kashiwagi, D & Hurtado, K 2011, Impact of bureaucracy on project change - A framework for evaluation. in COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference. pp. 245-255, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors International Research Conference, COBRA 2011, Salford, United Kingdom, 9/12/11.
Sullivan K, Kashiwagi D, Hurtado K. Impact of bureaucracy on project change - A framework for evaluation. In COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference. 2011. p. 245-255
Sullivan, Kenneth ; Kashiwagi, Dean ; Hurtado, Kristen. / Impact of bureaucracy on project change - A framework for evaluation. COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference. 2011. pp. 245-255
@inproceedings{387258dfa3b8428a94c9794aa91ff50e,
title = "Impact of bureaucracy on project change - A framework for evaluation",
abstract = "Changes in construction projects represent risks for all project stakeholders, but without uniform and reliable metrics to record and compare, changes are subject to opinions and cannot be easily analyzed. This paper proposes a framework for the evaluation of the impacts of an environment on project change. Bureaucratic and Less-Bureaucratic environments are used as case studies for the application of this framework. The impact of the environment on project change is calculated based on 1) Dominant metrics and KPI; 2) Clear classifications of the sources of change; and 3) Sound analyses regarding the recorded outcomes. This paper illustrated the difference between these two environments by comparing their rates of change and suggested areas of improvement. The four (4) metrics to quantify change were: 1) Cost; 2) Schedule; 3) Client satisfaction or quality rates; and 4) Quantities of types of changes; and the four (4) metrics to classify the source of change were: 1) Client; 2) Contractor; 3) Designer; and 4) Unforeseen. The results indicated that there was a greater percentage differential between schedule delays versus cost impacts of the two environments. Additionally, the client was the greatest source of change, specifically schedule changes in Less-Bureaucratic environments.",
keywords = "Bureaucracy, Environmental impact, Performance, Performance metrics, Project change",
author = "Kenneth Sullivan and Dean Kashiwagi and Kristen Hurtado",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781907842191",
pages = "245--255",
booktitle = "COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Impact of bureaucracy on project change - A framework for evaluation

AU - Sullivan, Kenneth

AU - Kashiwagi, Dean

AU - Hurtado, Kristen

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Changes in construction projects represent risks for all project stakeholders, but without uniform and reliable metrics to record and compare, changes are subject to opinions and cannot be easily analyzed. This paper proposes a framework for the evaluation of the impacts of an environment on project change. Bureaucratic and Less-Bureaucratic environments are used as case studies for the application of this framework. The impact of the environment on project change is calculated based on 1) Dominant metrics and KPI; 2) Clear classifications of the sources of change; and 3) Sound analyses regarding the recorded outcomes. This paper illustrated the difference between these two environments by comparing their rates of change and suggested areas of improvement. The four (4) metrics to quantify change were: 1) Cost; 2) Schedule; 3) Client satisfaction or quality rates; and 4) Quantities of types of changes; and the four (4) metrics to classify the source of change were: 1) Client; 2) Contractor; 3) Designer; and 4) Unforeseen. The results indicated that there was a greater percentage differential between schedule delays versus cost impacts of the two environments. Additionally, the client was the greatest source of change, specifically schedule changes in Less-Bureaucratic environments.

AB - Changes in construction projects represent risks for all project stakeholders, but without uniform and reliable metrics to record and compare, changes are subject to opinions and cannot be easily analyzed. This paper proposes a framework for the evaluation of the impacts of an environment on project change. Bureaucratic and Less-Bureaucratic environments are used as case studies for the application of this framework. The impact of the environment on project change is calculated based on 1) Dominant metrics and KPI; 2) Clear classifications of the sources of change; and 3) Sound analyses regarding the recorded outcomes. This paper illustrated the difference between these two environments by comparing their rates of change and suggested areas of improvement. The four (4) metrics to quantify change were: 1) Cost; 2) Schedule; 3) Client satisfaction or quality rates; and 4) Quantities of types of changes; and the four (4) metrics to classify the source of change were: 1) Client; 2) Contractor; 3) Designer; and 4) Unforeseen. The results indicated that there was a greater percentage differential between schedule delays versus cost impacts of the two environments. Additionally, the client was the greatest source of change, specifically schedule changes in Less-Bureaucratic environments.

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - Environmental impact

KW - Performance

KW - Performance metrics

KW - Project change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874961711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874961711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781907842191

SP - 245

EP - 255

BT - COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference

ER -