Impact of air pollution control costs on the cost and spatial arrangement of cellulosic biofuel production in the U.S.

Colin W. Murphy, Nathan Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Air pollution emissions regulation can affect the location, size, and technology choice of potential biofuel production facilities. Difficulty in obtaining air pollutant emission permits and the cost of air pollution control devices have been cited by some fuel producers as barriers to development. This paper expands on the Geospatial Bioenergy Systems Model (GBSM) to evaluate the effect of air pollution control costs on the availability, cost, and distribution of U.S. biofuel production by subjecting potential facility locations within U.S. Clean Air Act nonattainment areas, which exceed thresholds for healthy air quality, to additional costs. This paper compares three scenarios: one with air quality costs included, one without air quality costs, and one in which conversion facilities were prohibited in Clean Air Act nonattainment areas. While air quality regulation may substantially affect local decisions regarding siting or technology choices, their effect on the system as a whole is small. Most biofuel facilities are expected to be sited near to feedstock supplies, which are seldom in nonattainment areas. The average cost per unit of produced energy is less than 1% higher in the scenarios with air quality compliance costs than in scenarios without such costs. When facility construction is prohibited in nonattainment areas, the costs increase by slightly over 1%, due to increases in the distance feedstock is transported to facilities in attainment areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2157-2164
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 18 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Air pollution control
Biofuels
biofuel
pollution control
atmospheric pollution
Air quality
cost
air quality
Costs
Feedstocks
facility location
Air Pollutants
air
bioenergy
Air
Air pollution
compliance
Availability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Impact of air pollution control costs on the cost and spatial arrangement of cellulosic biofuel production in the U.S. / Murphy, Colin W.; Parker, Nathan.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 48, No. 4, 18.02.2014, p. 2157-2164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{49f414831e6a4bd8b9f962e325883858,
title = "Impact of air pollution control costs on the cost and spatial arrangement of cellulosic biofuel production in the U.S.",
abstract = "Air pollution emissions regulation can affect the location, size, and technology choice of potential biofuel production facilities. Difficulty in obtaining air pollutant emission permits and the cost of air pollution control devices have been cited by some fuel producers as barriers to development. This paper expands on the Geospatial Bioenergy Systems Model (GBSM) to evaluate the effect of air pollution control costs on the availability, cost, and distribution of U.S. biofuel production by subjecting potential facility locations within U.S. Clean Air Act nonattainment areas, which exceed thresholds for healthy air quality, to additional costs. This paper compares three scenarios: one with air quality costs included, one without air quality costs, and one in which conversion facilities were prohibited in Clean Air Act nonattainment areas. While air quality regulation may substantially affect local decisions regarding siting or technology choices, their effect on the system as a whole is small. Most biofuel facilities are expected to be sited near to feedstock supplies, which are seldom in nonattainment areas. The average cost per unit of produced energy is less than 1{\%} higher in the scenarios with air quality compliance costs than in scenarios without such costs. When facility construction is prohibited in nonattainment areas, the costs increase by slightly over 1{\%}, due to increases in the distance feedstock is transported to facilities in attainment areas.",
author = "Murphy, {Colin W.} and Nathan Parker",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1021/es405025h",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "2157--2164",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of air pollution control costs on the cost and spatial arrangement of cellulosic biofuel production in the U.S.

AU - Murphy, Colin W.

AU - Parker, Nathan

PY - 2014/2/18

Y1 - 2014/2/18

N2 - Air pollution emissions regulation can affect the location, size, and technology choice of potential biofuel production facilities. Difficulty in obtaining air pollutant emission permits and the cost of air pollution control devices have been cited by some fuel producers as barriers to development. This paper expands on the Geospatial Bioenergy Systems Model (GBSM) to evaluate the effect of air pollution control costs on the availability, cost, and distribution of U.S. biofuel production by subjecting potential facility locations within U.S. Clean Air Act nonattainment areas, which exceed thresholds for healthy air quality, to additional costs. This paper compares three scenarios: one with air quality costs included, one without air quality costs, and one in which conversion facilities were prohibited in Clean Air Act nonattainment areas. While air quality regulation may substantially affect local decisions regarding siting or technology choices, their effect on the system as a whole is small. Most biofuel facilities are expected to be sited near to feedstock supplies, which are seldom in nonattainment areas. The average cost per unit of produced energy is less than 1% higher in the scenarios with air quality compliance costs than in scenarios without such costs. When facility construction is prohibited in nonattainment areas, the costs increase by slightly over 1%, due to increases in the distance feedstock is transported to facilities in attainment areas.

AB - Air pollution emissions regulation can affect the location, size, and technology choice of potential biofuel production facilities. Difficulty in obtaining air pollutant emission permits and the cost of air pollution control devices have been cited by some fuel producers as barriers to development. This paper expands on the Geospatial Bioenergy Systems Model (GBSM) to evaluate the effect of air pollution control costs on the availability, cost, and distribution of U.S. biofuel production by subjecting potential facility locations within U.S. Clean Air Act nonattainment areas, which exceed thresholds for healthy air quality, to additional costs. This paper compares three scenarios: one with air quality costs included, one without air quality costs, and one in which conversion facilities were prohibited in Clean Air Act nonattainment areas. While air quality regulation may substantially affect local decisions regarding siting or technology choices, their effect on the system as a whole is small. Most biofuel facilities are expected to be sited near to feedstock supplies, which are seldom in nonattainment areas. The average cost per unit of produced energy is less than 1% higher in the scenarios with air quality compliance costs than in scenarios without such costs. When facility construction is prohibited in nonattainment areas, the costs increase by slightly over 1%, due to increases in the distance feedstock is transported to facilities in attainment areas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894226885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894226885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/es405025h

DO - 10.1021/es405025h

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 2157

EP - 2164

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 4

ER -