Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy

A. K. Kasinadhuni, A. Indahlastari, M. Chauhan, Michael Schär, T. H. Mareci, Rosalind Sadleir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background It has been assumed that effects caused by tDCS or tACS neuromodulation are due to electric current flow within brain structures. However, to date, direct current density distributions in the brains of human subjects have not been measured. Instead computational models of tDCS or tACS have been used to predict electric current and field distributions for dosimetry and mechanism analysis purposes. Objective/Hypothesis We present the first in vivo images of electric current density distributions within the brain in four subjects undergoing transcranial electrical stimulation. Methods Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) techniques encode current flow in phase images. In four human subjects, we used MREIT to measure magnetic flux density distributions caused by tACS currents, and then calculated current density distributions from these data. Computational models of magnetic flux and current distribution, constructed using contemporaneously collected T1-weighted structural MRI images, were co-registered to compare predicted and experimental results. Results We found consistency between experimental and simulated magnetic flux and current density distributions using transtemporal (T7-T8) and anterior-posterior (Fpz-Oz) electrode montages, and also differences that may indicate a need to improve models to better interpret experimental results. While human subject data agreed with computational model predictions in overall scale, differences may result from factors such as effective electrode surface area and conductivities assumed in models. Conclusions We believe this method may be useful in improving reproducibility, assessing safety, and ultimately aiding understanding of mechanisms of action in electrical and magnetic neuromodulation modalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)764-772
Number of pages9
JournalBrain Stimulation
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Head
Electric Impedance
Electrodes
Brain
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Tomography
Therapeutics
Safety
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Keywords

  • Current density
  • Finite element modeling
  • MREIT
  • MRI
  • tACS
  • tDCS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Biophysics
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Kasinadhuni, A. K., Indahlastari, A., Chauhan, M., Schär, M., Mareci, T. H., & Sadleir, R. (2017). Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy. Brain Stimulation, 10(4), 764-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.125

Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy. / Kasinadhuni, A. K.; Indahlastari, A.; Chauhan, M.; Schär, Michael; Mareci, T. H.; Sadleir, Rosalind.

In: Brain Stimulation, Vol. 10, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 764-772.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kasinadhuni, AK, Indahlastari, A, Chauhan, M, Schär, M, Mareci, TH & Sadleir, R 2017, 'Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy', Brain Stimulation, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 764-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.125
Kasinadhuni, A. K. ; Indahlastari, A. ; Chauhan, M. ; Schär, Michael ; Mareci, T. H. ; Sadleir, Rosalind. / Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy. In: Brain Stimulation. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 764-772.
@article{dafd1a4aea64452cb0a3c2749e127fc7,
title = "Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy",
abstract = "Background It has been assumed that effects caused by tDCS or tACS neuromodulation are due to electric current flow within brain structures. However, to date, direct current density distributions in the brains of human subjects have not been measured. Instead computational models of tDCS or tACS have been used to predict electric current and field distributions for dosimetry and mechanism analysis purposes. Objective/Hypothesis We present the first in vivo images of electric current density distributions within the brain in four subjects undergoing transcranial electrical stimulation. Methods Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) techniques encode current flow in phase images. In four human subjects, we used MREIT to measure magnetic flux density distributions caused by tACS currents, and then calculated current density distributions from these data. Computational models of magnetic flux and current distribution, constructed using contemporaneously collected T1-weighted structural MRI images, were co-registered to compare predicted and experimental results. Results We found consistency between experimental and simulated magnetic flux and current density distributions using transtemporal (T7-T8) and anterior-posterior (Fpz-Oz) electrode montages, and also differences that may indicate a need to improve models to better interpret experimental results. While human subject data agreed with computational model predictions in overall scale, differences may result from factors such as effective electrode surface area and conductivities assumed in models. Conclusions We believe this method may be useful in improving reproducibility, assessing safety, and ultimately aiding understanding of mechanisms of action in electrical and magnetic neuromodulation modalities.",
keywords = "Current density, Finite element modeling, MREIT, MRI, tACS, tDCS",
author = "Kasinadhuni, {A. K.} and A. Indahlastari and M. Chauhan and Michael Sch{\"a}r and Mareci, {T. H.} and Rosalind Sadleir",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.125",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "764--772",
journal = "Brain Stimulation",
issn = "1935-861X",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy

AU - Kasinadhuni, A. K.

AU - Indahlastari, A.

AU - Chauhan, M.

AU - Schär, Michael

AU - Mareci, T. H.

AU - Sadleir, Rosalind

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Background It has been assumed that effects caused by tDCS or tACS neuromodulation are due to electric current flow within brain structures. However, to date, direct current density distributions in the brains of human subjects have not been measured. Instead computational models of tDCS or tACS have been used to predict electric current and field distributions for dosimetry and mechanism analysis purposes. Objective/Hypothesis We present the first in vivo images of electric current density distributions within the brain in four subjects undergoing transcranial electrical stimulation. Methods Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) techniques encode current flow in phase images. In four human subjects, we used MREIT to measure magnetic flux density distributions caused by tACS currents, and then calculated current density distributions from these data. Computational models of magnetic flux and current distribution, constructed using contemporaneously collected T1-weighted structural MRI images, were co-registered to compare predicted and experimental results. Results We found consistency between experimental and simulated magnetic flux and current density distributions using transtemporal (T7-T8) and anterior-posterior (Fpz-Oz) electrode montages, and also differences that may indicate a need to improve models to better interpret experimental results. While human subject data agreed with computational model predictions in overall scale, differences may result from factors such as effective electrode surface area and conductivities assumed in models. Conclusions We believe this method may be useful in improving reproducibility, assessing safety, and ultimately aiding understanding of mechanisms of action in electrical and magnetic neuromodulation modalities.

AB - Background It has been assumed that effects caused by tDCS or tACS neuromodulation are due to electric current flow within brain structures. However, to date, direct current density distributions in the brains of human subjects have not been measured. Instead computational models of tDCS or tACS have been used to predict electric current and field distributions for dosimetry and mechanism analysis purposes. Objective/Hypothesis We present the first in vivo images of electric current density distributions within the brain in four subjects undergoing transcranial electrical stimulation. Methods Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) techniques encode current flow in phase images. In four human subjects, we used MREIT to measure magnetic flux density distributions caused by tACS currents, and then calculated current density distributions from these data. Computational models of magnetic flux and current distribution, constructed using contemporaneously collected T1-weighted structural MRI images, were co-registered to compare predicted and experimental results. Results We found consistency between experimental and simulated magnetic flux and current density distributions using transtemporal (T7-T8) and anterior-posterior (Fpz-Oz) electrode montages, and also differences that may indicate a need to improve models to better interpret experimental results. While human subject data agreed with computational model predictions in overall scale, differences may result from factors such as effective electrode surface area and conductivities assumed in models. Conclusions We believe this method may be useful in improving reproducibility, assessing safety, and ultimately aiding understanding of mechanisms of action in electrical and magnetic neuromodulation modalities.

KW - Current density

KW - Finite element modeling

KW - MREIT

KW - MRI

KW - tACS

KW - tDCS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018298090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018298090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.125

DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.125

M3 - Article

C2 - 28457836

AN - SCOPUS:85018298090

VL - 10

SP - 764

EP - 772

JO - Brain Stimulation

JF - Brain Stimulation

SN - 1935-861X

IS - 4

ER -