II. MORE THAN JUST CONVENIENT: THE SCIENTIFIC MERITS OF HOMOGENEOUS CONVENIENCE SAMPLES

Justin Jager, Diane L. Putnick, Marc H. Bornstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite their disadvantaged generalizability relative to probability samples, nonprobability convenience samples are the standard within developmental science, and likely will remain so because probability samples are cost-prohibitive and most available probability samples are ill-suited to examine developmental questions. In lieu of focusing on how to eliminate or sharply reduce reliance on convenience samples within developmental science, here we propose how to augment their advantages when it comes to understanding population effects as well as subpopulation differences. Although all convenience samples have less clear generalizability than probability samples, we argue that homogeneous convenience samples have clearer generalizability relative to conventional convenience samples. Therefore, when researchers are limited to convenience samples, they should consider homogeneous convenience samples as a positive alternative to conventional (or heterogeneous) convenience samples. We discuss future directions as well as potential obstacles to expanding the use of homogeneous convenience samples in developmental science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13-30
Number of pages18
JournalMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Sampling Studies
Vulnerable Populations
Research Personnel
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

II. MORE THAN JUST CONVENIENT : THE SCIENTIFIC MERITS OF HOMOGENEOUS CONVENIENCE SAMPLES. / Jager, Justin; Putnick, Diane L.; Bornstein, Marc H.

In: Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 82, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 13-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c8dc5d1d6fa4e7092839acdef5ac2be,
title = "II. MORE THAN JUST CONVENIENT: THE SCIENTIFIC MERITS OF HOMOGENEOUS CONVENIENCE SAMPLES",
abstract = "Despite their disadvantaged generalizability relative to probability samples, nonprobability convenience samples are the standard within developmental science, and likely will remain so because probability samples are cost-prohibitive and most available probability samples are ill-suited to examine developmental questions. In lieu of focusing on how to eliminate or sharply reduce reliance on convenience samples within developmental science, here we propose how to augment their advantages when it comes to understanding population effects as well as subpopulation differences. Although all convenience samples have less clear generalizability than probability samples, we argue that homogeneous convenience samples have clearer generalizability relative to conventional convenience samples. Therefore, when researchers are limited to convenience samples, they should consider homogeneous convenience samples as a positive alternative to conventional (or heterogeneous) convenience samples. We discuss future directions as well as potential obstacles to expanding the use of homogeneous convenience samples in developmental science.",
author = "Justin Jager and Putnick, {Diane L.} and Bornstein, {Marc H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/mono.12296",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "13--30",
journal = "Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development",
issn = "0037-976X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - II. MORE THAN JUST CONVENIENT

T2 - THE SCIENTIFIC MERITS OF HOMOGENEOUS CONVENIENCE SAMPLES

AU - Jager, Justin

AU - Putnick, Diane L.

AU - Bornstein, Marc H.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Despite their disadvantaged generalizability relative to probability samples, nonprobability convenience samples are the standard within developmental science, and likely will remain so because probability samples are cost-prohibitive and most available probability samples are ill-suited to examine developmental questions. In lieu of focusing on how to eliminate or sharply reduce reliance on convenience samples within developmental science, here we propose how to augment their advantages when it comes to understanding population effects as well as subpopulation differences. Although all convenience samples have less clear generalizability than probability samples, we argue that homogeneous convenience samples have clearer generalizability relative to conventional convenience samples. Therefore, when researchers are limited to convenience samples, they should consider homogeneous convenience samples as a positive alternative to conventional (or heterogeneous) convenience samples. We discuss future directions as well as potential obstacles to expanding the use of homogeneous convenience samples in developmental science.

AB - Despite their disadvantaged generalizability relative to probability samples, nonprobability convenience samples are the standard within developmental science, and likely will remain so because probability samples are cost-prohibitive and most available probability samples are ill-suited to examine developmental questions. In lieu of focusing on how to eliminate or sharply reduce reliance on convenience samples within developmental science, here we propose how to augment their advantages when it comes to understanding population effects as well as subpopulation differences. Although all convenience samples have less clear generalizability than probability samples, we argue that homogeneous convenience samples have clearer generalizability relative to conventional convenience samples. Therefore, when researchers are limited to convenience samples, they should consider homogeneous convenience samples as a positive alternative to conventional (or heterogeneous) convenience samples. We discuss future directions as well as potential obstacles to expanding the use of homogeneous convenience samples in developmental science.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018735118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018735118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/mono.12296

DO - 10.1111/mono.12296

M3 - Article

C2 - 28475254

AN - SCOPUS:85018735118

VL - 82

SP - 13

EP - 30

JO - Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development

JF - Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development

SN - 0037-976X

IS - 2

ER -