Identifying trust in social networks with stubborn agents, with application to market decisions

Hoi To Wai, Anna Scaglione, Amir Leshem

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

No man is an island: the opinions that shape human economic decisions reflect the fabric of trust that exists between one agent and its social network. In this work we discuss how stubborn agents in a network expose the relative trust that exists among the agents, by analyzing the system equations that are used in popular opinion diffusion models. We propose methods to measure the agents beliefs from their actions on social media. Preliminary results with simulations and real data highlight the interesting insights that can be gained by interpreting the social network interactions under this lens. We also discuss how the perception of personal utility in an economic transaction can be inferred by identifying the relative trust and controlling the stubborn agents influence, advertising through them products so that the social network perceives them more favorably.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages747-754
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9781509018239
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 4 2016
Event53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015 - Monticello, United States
Duration: Sep 29 2015Oct 2 2015

Other

Other53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2015
CountryUnited States
CityMonticello
Period9/29/1510/2/15

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Control and Systems Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying trust in social networks with stubborn agents, with application to market decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this