Identifying topic sentencehood

Philip M. Mccarthy, Adam M. Renner, Michael G. Duncan, Nicholas D. Duran, Erin J. Lightman, Danielle S. McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to assess two models of topic sentencehood identification: the derived model and the free model. According to the derived model, topic sentences are identified in the context of the paragraph and in terms of how well each sentence in the paragraph captures the paragraph's theme. In contrast, according to the free model, topic sentences can be identified on the basis of sentential features without reference to other sentences in the paragraph (i.e., without context). The results of the experiments suggest that human raters can identify topic sentences both with and without the context of the other sentences in the paragraph. Another goal of this study was to develop computational measures that approximated each of these models. When computational versions were assessed, the results for the free model were promising; however, the derived model results were poor. These results collectively imply that humans' identification of topic sentences in context may rely more heavily on sentential features than on the relationships between sentences in a paragraph.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)647-664
Number of pages18
JournalBehavior Research Methods
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying topic sentencehood'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Mccarthy, P. M., Renner, A. M., Duncan, M. G., Duran, N. D., Lightman, E. J., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Identifying topic sentencehood. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 647-664. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.647