Identifying the sources of technological novelty in the process of invention

Deborah Strumsky, Jose Lobo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Much work on technological change agrees that the combination of new and existing technological capabilities is one of the principal sources of inventive novelty, and that there have been instances in history when new inventions appear with few antecedents. The many discussions across research communities regarding the relative roles of combination and origination as sources of technological novelty have not provided much in the way of formal identification and quantification. By taking advantage of the technology codes used by the U.S. Patent Office to classify patents, we discretize technologies and identify four distinct sources of technological novelty. The resulting technological novelty taxonomy is then used to assess the relative importance of refining existing technologies, combining existing and new technologies, and de novo creation of technological capabilities as sources of new inventions. Our results clearly show that the process of invention has been primarily a combinatorial process accompanied by rare occurrences of technological origination. The importance of reusing existing technological capabilities to generate inventions has been steadily rising and recently overtook recombination as the source of novelty for most new inventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1445-1461
Number of pages17
JournalResearch Policy
Volume44
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Patents and inventions
Taxonomies
Refining
Invention
Novelty
Technological capability
Patents

Keywords

  • Combination
  • Origination
  • Patent technology codes
  • Technological novelty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Identifying the sources of technological novelty in the process of invention. / Strumsky, Deborah; Lobo, Jose.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 44, No. 8, 01.10.2015, p. 1445-1461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef35830a377646c6b4f794c9fa0bf7e2,
title = "Identifying the sources of technological novelty in the process of invention",
abstract = "Much work on technological change agrees that the combination of new and existing technological capabilities is one of the principal sources of inventive novelty, and that there have been instances in history when new inventions appear with few antecedents. The many discussions across research communities regarding the relative roles of combination and origination as sources of technological novelty have not provided much in the way of formal identification and quantification. By taking advantage of the technology codes used by the U.S. Patent Office to classify patents, we discretize technologies and identify four distinct sources of technological novelty. The resulting technological novelty taxonomy is then used to assess the relative importance of refining existing technologies, combining existing and new technologies, and de novo creation of technological capabilities as sources of new inventions. Our results clearly show that the process of invention has been primarily a combinatorial process accompanied by rare occurrences of technological origination. The importance of reusing existing technological capabilities to generate inventions has been steadily rising and recently overtook recombination as the source of novelty for most new inventions.",
keywords = "Combination, Origination, Patent technology codes, Technological novelty",
author = "Deborah Strumsky and Jose Lobo",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1445--1461",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying the sources of technological novelty in the process of invention

AU - Strumsky, Deborah

AU - Lobo, Jose

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Much work on technological change agrees that the combination of new and existing technological capabilities is one of the principal sources of inventive novelty, and that there have been instances in history when new inventions appear with few antecedents. The many discussions across research communities regarding the relative roles of combination and origination as sources of technological novelty have not provided much in the way of formal identification and quantification. By taking advantage of the technology codes used by the U.S. Patent Office to classify patents, we discretize technologies and identify four distinct sources of technological novelty. The resulting technological novelty taxonomy is then used to assess the relative importance of refining existing technologies, combining existing and new technologies, and de novo creation of technological capabilities as sources of new inventions. Our results clearly show that the process of invention has been primarily a combinatorial process accompanied by rare occurrences of technological origination. The importance of reusing existing technological capabilities to generate inventions has been steadily rising and recently overtook recombination as the source of novelty for most new inventions.

AB - Much work on technological change agrees that the combination of new and existing technological capabilities is one of the principal sources of inventive novelty, and that there have been instances in history when new inventions appear with few antecedents. The many discussions across research communities regarding the relative roles of combination and origination as sources of technological novelty have not provided much in the way of formal identification and quantification. By taking advantage of the technology codes used by the U.S. Patent Office to classify patents, we discretize technologies and identify four distinct sources of technological novelty. The resulting technological novelty taxonomy is then used to assess the relative importance of refining existing technologies, combining existing and new technologies, and de novo creation of technological capabilities as sources of new inventions. Our results clearly show that the process of invention has been primarily a combinatorial process accompanied by rare occurrences of technological origination. The importance of reusing existing technological capabilities to generate inventions has been steadily rising and recently overtook recombination as the source of novelty for most new inventions.

KW - Combination

KW - Origination

KW - Patent technology codes

KW - Technological novelty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937894882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937894882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937894882

VL - 44

SP - 1445

EP - 1461

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 8

ER -