Identifying reasoning strategies in medical decision making: A methodological guide

Jose F. Arocha, Dongwen Wang, Vimla Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reasoning strategies are a key component in many medical tasks, including decision making, clinical problem solving, and understanding of medical texts. Identification of reasoning strategies used by clinicians may prove critical to the optimal design of decision support systems. This paper presents a formal method of cognitive-semantic analysis for the identification and characterization of reasoning strategies deployed in medical tasks and demonstrates its use through specific examples. Although semantic analysis was originally developed in the investigation of knowledge structures, it can also be applied to identify the reasoning and decision processes used by physicians and medical trainees in clinical tasks. Assumptions underlying the methods, as well as illustrations of their use in diagnostic explanation tasks, are presented. We discuss semantic analysis in the context of the current interests in developing medical ontologies and argue that a frame-based propositional analytic methodology can provide a systematic way of addressing the construction of such ontologies. Although the application of propositional analysis methods has some limitations, we show how such limitations are being addressed and present some examples of information tools that have been developed to ease, and make more systematic, the process of analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)154-171
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Biomedical Informatics
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Semantics
Decision making
Ontology
Formal methods
Decision support systems
Physicians
Clinical Decision-Making

Keywords

  • Clinical reasoning
  • Diagnostic problem solving
  • Explanation tasks
  • Explanatory coherence
  • Information technology
  • Medical decision making
  • Semantic networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Catalysis

Cite this

Identifying reasoning strategies in medical decision making : A methodological guide. / Arocha, Jose F.; Wang, Dongwen; Patel, Vimla.

In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 38, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 154-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{27971635009c46a191bac6e34a9481e0,
title = "Identifying reasoning strategies in medical decision making: A methodological guide",
abstract = "Reasoning strategies are a key component in many medical tasks, including decision making, clinical problem solving, and understanding of medical texts. Identification of reasoning strategies used by clinicians may prove critical to the optimal design of decision support systems. This paper presents a formal method of cognitive-semantic analysis for the identification and characterization of reasoning strategies deployed in medical tasks and demonstrates its use through specific examples. Although semantic analysis was originally developed in the investigation of knowledge structures, it can also be applied to identify the reasoning and decision processes used by physicians and medical trainees in clinical tasks. Assumptions underlying the methods, as well as illustrations of their use in diagnostic explanation tasks, are presented. We discuss semantic analysis in the context of the current interests in developing medical ontologies and argue that a frame-based propositional analytic methodology can provide a systematic way of addressing the construction of such ontologies. Although the application of propositional analysis methods has some limitations, we show how such limitations are being addressed and present some examples of information tools that have been developed to ease, and make more systematic, the process of analysis.",
keywords = "Clinical reasoning, Diagnostic problem solving, Explanation tasks, Explanatory coherence, Information technology, Medical decision making, Semantic networks",
author = "Arocha, {Jose F.} and Dongwen Wang and Vimla Patel",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "154--171",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Informatics",
issn = "1532-0464",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying reasoning strategies in medical decision making

T2 - A methodological guide

AU - Arocha, Jose F.

AU - Wang, Dongwen

AU - Patel, Vimla

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Reasoning strategies are a key component in many medical tasks, including decision making, clinical problem solving, and understanding of medical texts. Identification of reasoning strategies used by clinicians may prove critical to the optimal design of decision support systems. This paper presents a formal method of cognitive-semantic analysis for the identification and characterization of reasoning strategies deployed in medical tasks and demonstrates its use through specific examples. Although semantic analysis was originally developed in the investigation of knowledge structures, it can also be applied to identify the reasoning and decision processes used by physicians and medical trainees in clinical tasks. Assumptions underlying the methods, as well as illustrations of their use in diagnostic explanation tasks, are presented. We discuss semantic analysis in the context of the current interests in developing medical ontologies and argue that a frame-based propositional analytic methodology can provide a systematic way of addressing the construction of such ontologies. Although the application of propositional analysis methods has some limitations, we show how such limitations are being addressed and present some examples of information tools that have been developed to ease, and make more systematic, the process of analysis.

AB - Reasoning strategies are a key component in many medical tasks, including decision making, clinical problem solving, and understanding of medical texts. Identification of reasoning strategies used by clinicians may prove critical to the optimal design of decision support systems. This paper presents a formal method of cognitive-semantic analysis for the identification and characterization of reasoning strategies deployed in medical tasks and demonstrates its use through specific examples. Although semantic analysis was originally developed in the investigation of knowledge structures, it can also be applied to identify the reasoning and decision processes used by physicians and medical trainees in clinical tasks. Assumptions underlying the methods, as well as illustrations of their use in diagnostic explanation tasks, are presented. We discuss semantic analysis in the context of the current interests in developing medical ontologies and argue that a frame-based propositional analytic methodology can provide a systematic way of addressing the construction of such ontologies. Although the application of propositional analysis methods has some limitations, we show how such limitations are being addressed and present some examples of information tools that have been developed to ease, and make more systematic, the process of analysis.

KW - Clinical reasoning

KW - Diagnostic problem solving

KW - Explanation tasks

KW - Explanatory coherence

KW - Information technology

KW - Medical decision making

KW - Semantic networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15944400052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15944400052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 15797004

AN - SCOPUS:15944400052

VL - 38

SP - 154

EP - 171

JO - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

JF - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

SN - 1532-0464

IS - 2

ER -