Identifying Creativity During Problem Solving Using Linguistic Features

Stephen Skalicky, Scott A. Crossley, Danielle McNamara, Kasia Muldner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Creativity is commonly assessed using divergent thinking tasks, which measure the fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration of participant output on a variety of different tasks. This study assesses the degree to which creativity can be identified based on linguistic features of participants’ language while completing collaborative divergent thinking tasks. To this end, 78 participants’ conversational dialogs (i.e., 39 dyads) within a chat environment were collected while completing three open-ended problem-solving tasks. Expert raters scored the dialogs in terms of fluency, flexibility, elaboration, and originality, as well as three types of creative language (metaphor and simile, humor, and word play). Factor analyses indicated that these scores captured two main constructs (creativity and elaboration). The linguistic features of the participants’ language (captured computationally using natural language processing tools) accounted for significant amounts of variation in both the creativity (R2 =.640) and elaboration (R2 =.550) scores within linear mixed effect (LME) models. These results highlight specific linguistic features that can be used to explain large amounts of variance in constructs related to creativity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-353
Number of pages11
JournalCreativity Research Journal
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2017

Fingerprint

Creativity
Linguistics
Language
Natural Language Processing
Metaphor
Wit and Humor
Statistical Factor Analysis
Problem Solving
Linguistic Features
Elaboration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Identifying Creativity During Problem Solving Using Linguistic Features. / Skalicky, Stephen; Crossley, Scott A.; McNamara, Danielle; Muldner, Kasia.

In: Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 29, No. 4, 02.10.2017, p. 343-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Skalicky, Stephen ; Crossley, Scott A. ; McNamara, Danielle ; Muldner, Kasia. / Identifying Creativity During Problem Solving Using Linguistic Features. In: Creativity Research Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 343-353.
@article{be0c49b26638435ea3e142ffa8b29aa1,
title = "Identifying Creativity During Problem Solving Using Linguistic Features",
abstract = "Creativity is commonly assessed using divergent thinking tasks, which measure the fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration of participant output on a variety of different tasks. This study assesses the degree to which creativity can be identified based on linguistic features of participants’ language while completing collaborative divergent thinking tasks. To this end, 78 participants’ conversational dialogs (i.e., 39 dyads) within a chat environment were collected while completing three open-ended problem-solving tasks. Expert raters scored the dialogs in terms of fluency, flexibility, elaboration, and originality, as well as three types of creative language (metaphor and simile, humor, and word play). Factor analyses indicated that these scores captured two main constructs (creativity and elaboration). The linguistic features of the participants’ language (captured computationally using natural language processing tools) accounted for significant amounts of variation in both the creativity (R2 =.640) and elaboration (R2 =.550) scores within linear mixed effect (LME) models. These results highlight specific linguistic features that can be used to explain large amounts of variance in constructs related to creativity.",
author = "Stephen Skalicky and Crossley, {Scott A.} and Danielle McNamara and Kasia Muldner",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10400419.2017.1376490",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "343--353",
journal = "Creativity Research Journal",
issn = "1040-0419",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying Creativity During Problem Solving Using Linguistic Features

AU - Skalicky, Stephen

AU - Crossley, Scott A.

AU - McNamara, Danielle

AU - Muldner, Kasia

PY - 2017/10/2

Y1 - 2017/10/2

N2 - Creativity is commonly assessed using divergent thinking tasks, which measure the fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration of participant output on a variety of different tasks. This study assesses the degree to which creativity can be identified based on linguistic features of participants’ language while completing collaborative divergent thinking tasks. To this end, 78 participants’ conversational dialogs (i.e., 39 dyads) within a chat environment were collected while completing three open-ended problem-solving tasks. Expert raters scored the dialogs in terms of fluency, flexibility, elaboration, and originality, as well as three types of creative language (metaphor and simile, humor, and word play). Factor analyses indicated that these scores captured two main constructs (creativity and elaboration). The linguistic features of the participants’ language (captured computationally using natural language processing tools) accounted for significant amounts of variation in both the creativity (R2 =.640) and elaboration (R2 =.550) scores within linear mixed effect (LME) models. These results highlight specific linguistic features that can be used to explain large amounts of variance in constructs related to creativity.

AB - Creativity is commonly assessed using divergent thinking tasks, which measure the fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration of participant output on a variety of different tasks. This study assesses the degree to which creativity can be identified based on linguistic features of participants’ language while completing collaborative divergent thinking tasks. To this end, 78 participants’ conversational dialogs (i.e., 39 dyads) within a chat environment were collected while completing three open-ended problem-solving tasks. Expert raters scored the dialogs in terms of fluency, flexibility, elaboration, and originality, as well as three types of creative language (metaphor and simile, humor, and word play). Factor analyses indicated that these scores captured two main constructs (creativity and elaboration). The linguistic features of the participants’ language (captured computationally using natural language processing tools) accounted for significant amounts of variation in both the creativity (R2 =.640) and elaboration (R2 =.550) scores within linear mixed effect (LME) models. These results highlight specific linguistic features that can be used to explain large amounts of variance in constructs related to creativity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032699696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032699696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10400419.2017.1376490

DO - 10.1080/10400419.2017.1376490

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 343

EP - 353

JO - Creativity Research Journal

JF - Creativity Research Journal

SN - 1040-0419

IS - 4

ER -