TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification Performance from Multiple Lineups
T2 - Should Eyewitnesses Who Pick Fillers Be Burned?
AU - Smalarz, Laura
AU - Kornell, Nate
AU - Vaughn, Kalif E.
AU - Palmer, Matthew A.
N1 - Funding Information:
M. Palmer was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant ( DP140103746 ) funded by the Australian Government. N. Kornell was supported by Scholar Award 220020371 from the James S. McDonnell Foundation .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Over the course of a criminal investigation, eyewitnesses are sometimes shown multiple lineups in an attempt to identify the culprit, yet little research has examined eyewitness identification performance from multiple lineups. In two experiments, we examined eyewitness identification accuracy among witnesses who made an inaccurate identification from an initial lineup, correctly rejected an initial lineup, or saw no initial lineup. Consistent with the legal practice of “burning” eyewitnesses who pick fillers, witnesses who made an inaccurate identification from an initial lineup provided subsequent identification evidence that had little diagnostic value and reflected poor memory performance. Critically, these eyewitnesses’ initial-identification confidence did not predict their subsequent identification accuracy, thus precluding the identification of witnesses who could provide diagnostic evidence in a subsequent lineup. Eyewitnesses who correctly rejected the initial lineup performed similarly to eyewitnesses who saw only one lineup, and initial-rejection confidence was associated with subsequent identification accuracy under some conditions.
AB - Over the course of a criminal investigation, eyewitnesses are sometimes shown multiple lineups in an attempt to identify the culprit, yet little research has examined eyewitness identification performance from multiple lineups. In two experiments, we examined eyewitness identification accuracy among witnesses who made an inaccurate identification from an initial lineup, correctly rejected an initial lineup, or saw no initial lineup. Consistent with the legal practice of “burning” eyewitnesses who pick fillers, witnesses who made an inaccurate identification from an initial lineup provided subsequent identification evidence that had little diagnostic value and reflected poor memory performance. Critically, these eyewitnesses’ initial-identification confidence did not predict their subsequent identification accuracy, thus precluding the identification of witnesses who could provide diagnostic evidence in a subsequent lineup. Eyewitnesses who correctly rejected the initial lineup performed similarly to eyewitnesses who saw only one lineup, and initial-rejection confidence was associated with subsequent identification accuracy under some conditions.
KW - Diagnosticity
KW - Discriminability
KW - Eyewitness confidence
KW - Eyewitness identification
KW - Eyewitness memory
KW - Multiple lineups
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065914064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065914064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.03.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.03.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065914064
SN - 2211-3681
VL - 8
SP - 221
EP - 232
JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
IS - 2
ER -