Hypnosis and relaxation with pain patients: Evidence for effectiveness

Rodger Kessler, David R. Patterson, Joseph Dane

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypnosis and relaxation are prominent ancillary clinical techniques in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. This article evaluates the evidence and support for the use of these techniques as part of medical treatment. Questions are raised about the utility of grouping hypnosis and relaxation together and we review a continuum of self-regulation techniques upon which hypnosis and self regulation appear to be points. We conclude that we are not yet able to identify a continuum of effectiveness despite there being significant support for hypnotic interventions and some, but more modest, support for relaxation. In addition to clarifying methodological dilemmas we urge that future research must specifically assess hypnotic suggestibility independent of whether the intervention is or is not hypnosis, evaluate non-specific effects, and review dose effect as part of further investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-78
Number of pages12
JournalSeminars in Pain Medicine
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hypnosis
Pain
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Acute Pain
Chronic Pain
Therapeutics
Self-Control

Keywords

  • Hypnosis
  • Pain
  • Relaxation
  • Self efficacy
  • Self regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Hypnosis and relaxation with pain patients : Evidence for effectiveness. / Kessler, Rodger; Patterson, David R.; Dane, Joseph.

In: Seminars in Pain Medicine, Vol. 1, No. 2, 01.01.2003, p. 67-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Kessler, Rodger ; Patterson, David R. ; Dane, Joseph. / Hypnosis and relaxation with pain patients : Evidence for effectiveness. In: Seminars in Pain Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 67-78.
@article{56ef9d757c2448888ca449f9f8288fa1,
title = "Hypnosis and relaxation with pain patients: Evidence for effectiveness",
abstract = "Hypnosis and relaxation are prominent ancillary clinical techniques in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. This article evaluates the evidence and support for the use of these techniques as part of medical treatment. Questions are raised about the utility of grouping hypnosis and relaxation together and we review a continuum of self-regulation techniques upon which hypnosis and self regulation appear to be points. We conclude that we are not yet able to identify a continuum of effectiveness despite there being significant support for hypnotic interventions and some, but more modest, support for relaxation. In addition to clarifying methodological dilemmas we urge that future research must specifically assess hypnotic suggestibility independent of whether the intervention is or is not hypnosis, evaluate non-specific effects, and review dose effect as part of further investigation.",
keywords = "Hypnosis, Pain, Relaxation, Self efficacy, Self regulation",
author = "Rodger Kessler and Patterson, {David R.} and Joseph Dane",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1537-5897(03)00019-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "67--78",
journal = "Seminars in Pain Medicine",
issn = "1537-5897",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hypnosis and relaxation with pain patients

T2 - Evidence for effectiveness

AU - Kessler, Rodger

AU - Patterson, David R.

AU - Dane, Joseph

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Hypnosis and relaxation are prominent ancillary clinical techniques in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. This article evaluates the evidence and support for the use of these techniques as part of medical treatment. Questions are raised about the utility of grouping hypnosis and relaxation together and we review a continuum of self-regulation techniques upon which hypnosis and self regulation appear to be points. We conclude that we are not yet able to identify a continuum of effectiveness despite there being significant support for hypnotic interventions and some, but more modest, support for relaxation. In addition to clarifying methodological dilemmas we urge that future research must specifically assess hypnotic suggestibility independent of whether the intervention is or is not hypnosis, evaluate non-specific effects, and review dose effect as part of further investigation.

AB - Hypnosis and relaxation are prominent ancillary clinical techniques in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. This article evaluates the evidence and support for the use of these techniques as part of medical treatment. Questions are raised about the utility of grouping hypnosis and relaxation together and we review a continuum of self-regulation techniques upon which hypnosis and self regulation appear to be points. We conclude that we are not yet able to identify a continuum of effectiveness despite there being significant support for hypnotic interventions and some, but more modest, support for relaxation. In addition to clarifying methodological dilemmas we urge that future research must specifically assess hypnotic suggestibility independent of whether the intervention is or is not hypnosis, evaluate non-specific effects, and review dose effect as part of further investigation.

KW - Hypnosis

KW - Pain

KW - Relaxation

KW - Self efficacy

KW - Self regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15944361860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15944361860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1537-5897(03)00019-3

DO - 10.1016/S1537-5897(03)00019-3

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:15944361860

VL - 1

SP - 67

EP - 78

JO - Seminars in Pain Medicine

JF - Seminars in Pain Medicine

SN - 1537-5897

IS - 2

ER -