180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Humans likely evolved precautionary systems designed to minimize the threats to reproductive fitness posed by highly interdependent ultrasociality. A review of research on the self-protection and disease avoidance systems reveals that each system is functionally distinct and domain-specific: each is attuned to different cues; engages different emotions, inferences, and behavioral inclinations; and is rooted in somewhat different neurobiological substrates. These systems share important features, however. Each system is functionally coherent, in that perceptual, affective, cognitive, and behavioral processes work in concert to reduce fitness costs of potential threats. Each system is biased in a risk-averse manner, erring toward precautionary responses even when available cues only heuristically imply threat. And each system is functionally flexible, being highly sensitive to specific ecological and dispositional cues that signal greater vulnerability to the relevant threat. These features characterize a general template useful for understanding not only the self-protection and disease avoidance systems, but also a broader set of evolved, domain-specific precautionary systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1042-1051
Number of pages10
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Cues
Genetic Fitness
Emotions
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Disease avoidance
  • Disgust
  • Domain specificity
  • Error management
  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Fear
  • Motivation
  • Precautionary psychology
  • Prejudice
  • Self-protection
  • Social cognition
  • Stigma
  • Threat management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Human threat management systems : Self-protection and disease avoidance. / Neuberg, Steven; Kenrick, Douglas; Schaller, Mark.

In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 35, No. 4, 03.2011, p. 1042-1051.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90e9921d3e56419cafb4cbca29b7399c,
title = "Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance",
abstract = "Humans likely evolved precautionary systems designed to minimize the threats to reproductive fitness posed by highly interdependent ultrasociality. A review of research on the self-protection and disease avoidance systems reveals that each system is functionally distinct and domain-specific: each is attuned to different cues; engages different emotions, inferences, and behavioral inclinations; and is rooted in somewhat different neurobiological substrates. These systems share important features, however. Each system is functionally coherent, in that perceptual, affective, cognitive, and behavioral processes work in concert to reduce fitness costs of potential threats. Each system is biased in a risk-averse manner, erring toward precautionary responses even when available cues only heuristically imply threat. And each system is functionally flexible, being highly sensitive to specific ecological and dispositional cues that signal greater vulnerability to the relevant threat. These features characterize a general template useful for understanding not only the self-protection and disease avoidance systems, but also a broader set of evolved, domain-specific precautionary systems.",
keywords = "Disease avoidance, Disgust, Domain specificity, Error management, Evolutionary psychology, Fear, Motivation, Precautionary psychology, Prejudice, Self-protection, Social cognition, Stigma, Threat management",
author = "Steven Neuberg and Douglas Kenrick and Mark Schaller",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1042--1051",
journal = "Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews",
issn = "0149-7634",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human threat management systems

T2 - Self-protection and disease avoidance

AU - Neuberg, Steven

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

AU - Schaller, Mark

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Humans likely evolved precautionary systems designed to minimize the threats to reproductive fitness posed by highly interdependent ultrasociality. A review of research on the self-protection and disease avoidance systems reveals that each system is functionally distinct and domain-specific: each is attuned to different cues; engages different emotions, inferences, and behavioral inclinations; and is rooted in somewhat different neurobiological substrates. These systems share important features, however. Each system is functionally coherent, in that perceptual, affective, cognitive, and behavioral processes work in concert to reduce fitness costs of potential threats. Each system is biased in a risk-averse manner, erring toward precautionary responses even when available cues only heuristically imply threat. And each system is functionally flexible, being highly sensitive to specific ecological and dispositional cues that signal greater vulnerability to the relevant threat. These features characterize a general template useful for understanding not only the self-protection and disease avoidance systems, but also a broader set of evolved, domain-specific precautionary systems.

AB - Humans likely evolved precautionary systems designed to minimize the threats to reproductive fitness posed by highly interdependent ultrasociality. A review of research on the self-protection and disease avoidance systems reveals that each system is functionally distinct and domain-specific: each is attuned to different cues; engages different emotions, inferences, and behavioral inclinations; and is rooted in somewhat different neurobiological substrates. These systems share important features, however. Each system is functionally coherent, in that perceptual, affective, cognitive, and behavioral processes work in concert to reduce fitness costs of potential threats. Each system is biased in a risk-averse manner, erring toward precautionary responses even when available cues only heuristically imply threat. And each system is functionally flexible, being highly sensitive to specific ecological and dispositional cues that signal greater vulnerability to the relevant threat. These features characterize a general template useful for understanding not only the self-protection and disease avoidance systems, but also a broader set of evolved, domain-specific precautionary systems.

KW - Disease avoidance

KW - Disgust

KW - Domain specificity

KW - Error management

KW - Evolutionary psychology

KW - Fear

KW - Motivation

KW - Precautionary psychology

KW - Prejudice

KW - Self-protection

KW - Social cognition

KW - Stigma

KW - Threat management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951581679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951581679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.011

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1042

EP - 1051

JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

SN - 0149-7634

IS - 4

ER -