Human rights pathways to just sustainabilities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ecosystem disruptions pose a threat to us all, but are most acutely felt by the vulnerable: climate refugees, those experiencing water and food insecurity, or those displaced by pollution and ecosystem degradation. We struggle to find "solutions," but they often pale in comparison to the risks we face. Collaborative approaches to sustainability that strive for balance between humans and nature are necessary but insufficient for addressing destabilizing trends. This paper argues that shifting the focus to destructive social relations and imbalances among humans unveils critical insights into to our destructive relationship with nature. A sociological view of human rights-in particular where they meet sustainability challenges-can sharpen this focus, providing guardrails within which to conceptualize, measure, and address systemic sociopolitical dimensions of sustainability challenges. The relative clarity of human rights (compared to the more amorphous "justice"), their increasing institutionalization in law and policy, and their broad legitimacy provides a structure to give "teeth" to transformational efforts stymied by inertia or unyielding power dynamics. Examples from original research and secondary literature demonstrate the utility of human rights as mechanisms of social transformation, setting boundaries for accountability and conflict resolution and laying the ground for building more just and sustainable futures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3255
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

human rights
Sustainable development
sustainability
Ecosystems
nutrition situation
accountability
refugee
conflict resolution
institutionalization
inertia
Social Relations
tooth
legitimacy
Pollution
justice
climate
threat
Degradation
pollution
water

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Human rights
  • Justice
  • MAPs framework
  • Social pillar
  • Social transformation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Human rights pathways to just sustainabilities. / Haglund, LaDawn.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 11, No. 12, 3255, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{909b04ea28514edd87f8ce5957ac32b5,
title = "Human rights pathways to just sustainabilities",
abstract = "Ecosystem disruptions pose a threat to us all, but are most acutely felt by the vulnerable: climate refugees, those experiencing water and food insecurity, or those displaced by pollution and ecosystem degradation. We struggle to find {"}solutions,{"} but they often pale in comparison to the risks we face. Collaborative approaches to sustainability that strive for balance between humans and nature are necessary but insufficient for addressing destabilizing trends. This paper argues that shifting the focus to destructive social relations and imbalances among humans unveils critical insights into to our destructive relationship with nature. A sociological view of human rights-in particular where they meet sustainability challenges-can sharpen this focus, providing guardrails within which to conceptualize, measure, and address systemic sociopolitical dimensions of sustainability challenges. The relative clarity of human rights (compared to the more amorphous {"}justice{"}), their increasing institutionalization in law and policy, and their broad legitimacy provides a structure to give {"}teeth{"} to transformational efforts stymied by inertia or unyielding power dynamics. Examples from original research and secondary literature demonstrate the utility of human rights as mechanisms of social transformation, setting boundaries for accountability and conflict resolution and laying the ground for building more just and sustainable futures.",
keywords = "Conflict, Human rights, Justice, MAPs framework, Social pillar, Social transformation",
author = "LaDawn Haglund",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/su10023255",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human rights pathways to just sustainabilities

AU - Haglund, LaDawn

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Ecosystem disruptions pose a threat to us all, but are most acutely felt by the vulnerable: climate refugees, those experiencing water and food insecurity, or those displaced by pollution and ecosystem degradation. We struggle to find "solutions," but they often pale in comparison to the risks we face. Collaborative approaches to sustainability that strive for balance between humans and nature are necessary but insufficient for addressing destabilizing trends. This paper argues that shifting the focus to destructive social relations and imbalances among humans unveils critical insights into to our destructive relationship with nature. A sociological view of human rights-in particular where they meet sustainability challenges-can sharpen this focus, providing guardrails within which to conceptualize, measure, and address systemic sociopolitical dimensions of sustainability challenges. The relative clarity of human rights (compared to the more amorphous "justice"), their increasing institutionalization in law and policy, and their broad legitimacy provides a structure to give "teeth" to transformational efforts stymied by inertia or unyielding power dynamics. Examples from original research and secondary literature demonstrate the utility of human rights as mechanisms of social transformation, setting boundaries for accountability and conflict resolution and laying the ground for building more just and sustainable futures.

AB - Ecosystem disruptions pose a threat to us all, but are most acutely felt by the vulnerable: climate refugees, those experiencing water and food insecurity, or those displaced by pollution and ecosystem degradation. We struggle to find "solutions," but they often pale in comparison to the risks we face. Collaborative approaches to sustainability that strive for balance between humans and nature are necessary but insufficient for addressing destabilizing trends. This paper argues that shifting the focus to destructive social relations and imbalances among humans unveils critical insights into to our destructive relationship with nature. A sociological view of human rights-in particular where they meet sustainability challenges-can sharpen this focus, providing guardrails within which to conceptualize, measure, and address systemic sociopolitical dimensions of sustainability challenges. The relative clarity of human rights (compared to the more amorphous "justice"), their increasing institutionalization in law and policy, and their broad legitimacy provides a structure to give "teeth" to transformational efforts stymied by inertia or unyielding power dynamics. Examples from original research and secondary literature demonstrate the utility of human rights as mechanisms of social transformation, setting boundaries for accountability and conflict resolution and laying the ground for building more just and sustainable futures.

KW - Conflict

KW - Human rights

KW - Justice

KW - MAPs framework

KW - Social pillar

KW - Social transformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069792713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069792713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su10023255

DO - 10.3390/su10023255

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069792713

VL - 11

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 12

M1 - 3255

ER -