Human embryonic stem cell research: An argument for national research review

Françoise Baylis, Jason Robert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recently published voluntary guidelines for human embryonic stem (hES) cell research. The NAS guidelines propose two levels of oversight. At the local level,research institutions are to create Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight (ESCRO) committees with a mandate to assess the scientific merit and ethical acceptability of hES cell research. At the national level,a new committee is to be created,not to review specific research proposals,but rather to periodically assess,and as needed revise,the NAS guidelines. In this article,we critically assess this proposal. In particular,we review the benefits and limitations of local research review. On this basis,we argue that local review is insufficient for hES cell research and that while there are obvious pragmatic and political reasons for the NAS to favor local research review,there are more compelling reasons for the NAS to have recommended national review of hES cell research proposals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-224
Number of pages18
JournalAccountability in Research
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

stem cell research
Stem Cell Research
Academy of Sciences
Research
Guidelines
Research Design
pragmatics
Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Keywords

  • IRB
  • Public Policy
  • Research ethics
  • Research ethics committees
  • Stem cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Human embryonic stem cell research : An argument for national research review. / Baylis, Françoise; Robert, Jason.

In: Accountability in Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2006, p. 207-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dde4a0f086f6477c995cd0ae01c9f388,
title = "Human embryonic stem cell research: An argument for national research review",
abstract = "The US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recently published voluntary guidelines for human embryonic stem (hES) cell research. The NAS guidelines propose two levels of oversight. At the local level,research institutions are to create Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight (ESCRO) committees with a mandate to assess the scientific merit and ethical acceptability of hES cell research. At the national level,a new committee is to be created,not to review specific research proposals,but rather to periodically assess,and as needed revise,the NAS guidelines. In this article,we critically assess this proposal. In particular,we review the benefits and limitations of local research review. On this basis,we argue that local review is insufficient for hES cell research and that while there are obvious pragmatic and political reasons for the NAS to favor local research review,there are more compelling reasons for the NAS to have recommended national review of hES cell research proposals.",
keywords = "IRB, Public Policy, Research ethics, Research ethics committees, Stem cells",
author = "Fran{\cc}oise Baylis and Jason Robert",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/03605300600848136",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "207--224",
journal = "Accountability in Research",
issn = "0898-9621",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human embryonic stem cell research

T2 - An argument for national research review

AU - Baylis, Françoise

AU - Robert, Jason

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recently published voluntary guidelines for human embryonic stem (hES) cell research. The NAS guidelines propose two levels of oversight. At the local level,research institutions are to create Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight (ESCRO) committees with a mandate to assess the scientific merit and ethical acceptability of hES cell research. At the national level,a new committee is to be created,not to review specific research proposals,but rather to periodically assess,and as needed revise,the NAS guidelines. In this article,we critically assess this proposal. In particular,we review the benefits and limitations of local research review. On this basis,we argue that local review is insufficient for hES cell research and that while there are obvious pragmatic and political reasons for the NAS to favor local research review,there are more compelling reasons for the NAS to have recommended national review of hES cell research proposals.

AB - The US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recently published voluntary guidelines for human embryonic stem (hES) cell research. The NAS guidelines propose two levels of oversight. At the local level,research institutions are to create Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight (ESCRO) committees with a mandate to assess the scientific merit and ethical acceptability of hES cell research. At the national level,a new committee is to be created,not to review specific research proposals,but rather to periodically assess,and as needed revise,the NAS guidelines. In this article,we critically assess this proposal. In particular,we review the benefits and limitations of local research review. On this basis,we argue that local review is insufficient for hES cell research and that while there are obvious pragmatic and political reasons for the NAS to favor local research review,there are more compelling reasons for the NAS to have recommended national review of hES cell research proposals.

KW - IRB

KW - Public Policy

KW - Research ethics

KW - Research ethics committees

KW - Stem cells

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248517738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248517738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03605300600848136

DO - 10.1080/03605300600848136

M3 - Article

C2 - 17124758

AN - SCOPUS:34248517738

VL - 13

SP - 207

EP - 224

JO - Accountability in Research

JF - Accountability in Research

SN - 0898-9621

IS - 3

ER -