How will we react to the discovery of extraterrestrial life?

Jung Yul Kwon, Hannah L. Bercovici, Katja Cunningham, Michael Varnum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How will humanity react to the discovery of extraterrestrial life? Speculation on this topic abounds, but empirical research is practically non-existent. We report the results of three empirical studies assessing psychological reactions to the discovery of extraterrestrial life using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) text analysis software. We examined language use in media coverage of past discovery announcements of this nature, with a focus on extraterrestrial microbial life (Pilot Study). A large online sample (N = 501) was asked to write about their own and humanity's reaction to a hypothetical announcement of such a discovery (Study 1), and an independent, large online sample (N = 256) was asked to read and respond to a newspaper story about the claim that fossilized extraterrestrial microbial life had been found in a meteorite of Martian origin (Study 2). Across these studies, we found that reactions were significantly more positive than negative, and more reward vs. risk oriented. A mini-meta-analysis revealed large overall effect sizes (positive vs. negative affect language: g = 0.98; reward vs. risk language: g = 0.81). We also found that people's forecasts of their own reactions showed a greater positivity bias than their forecasts of humanity's reactions (Study 1), and that responses to reading an actual announcement of the discovery of extraterrestrial microbial life showed a greater positivity bias than responses to reading an actual announcement of the creation of man-made synthetic life (Study 2). Taken together, this work suggests that our reactions to a future confirmed discovery of microbial extraterrestrial life are likely to be fairly positive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2308
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume8
Issue numberJAN
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 10 2018

Fingerprint

Exobiology
Language
Reward
Reading
Meteoroids
Newspapers
Empirical Research
Linguistics
Meta-Analysis
Software
Psychology

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Extraterrestrial life
  • LIWC
  • Scientific discovery
  • Societal reactions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

How will we react to the discovery of extraterrestrial life? / Kwon, Jung Yul; Bercovici, Hannah L.; Cunningham, Katja; Varnum, Michael.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, No. JAN, 2308, 10.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kwon, Jung Yul ; Bercovici, Hannah L. ; Cunningham, Katja ; Varnum, Michael. / How will we react to the discovery of extraterrestrial life?. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. JAN.
@article{46df9ebe933f4d6b858cf629f09dabb1,
title = "How will we react to the discovery of extraterrestrial life?",
abstract = "How will humanity react to the discovery of extraterrestrial life? Speculation on this topic abounds, but empirical research is practically non-existent. We report the results of three empirical studies assessing psychological reactions to the discovery of extraterrestrial life using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) text analysis software. We examined language use in media coverage of past discovery announcements of this nature, with a focus on extraterrestrial microbial life (Pilot Study). A large online sample (N = 501) was asked to write about their own and humanity's reaction to a hypothetical announcement of such a discovery (Study 1), and an independent, large online sample (N = 256) was asked to read and respond to a newspaper story about the claim that fossilized extraterrestrial microbial life had been found in a meteorite of Martian origin (Study 2). Across these studies, we found that reactions were significantly more positive than negative, and more reward vs. risk oriented. A mini-meta-analysis revealed large overall effect sizes (positive vs. negative affect language: g = 0.98; reward vs. risk language: g = 0.81). We also found that people's forecasts of their own reactions showed a greater positivity bias than their forecasts of humanity's reactions (Study 1), and that responses to reading an actual announcement of the discovery of extraterrestrial microbial life showed a greater positivity bias than responses to reading an actual announcement of the creation of man-made synthetic life (Study 2). Taken together, this work suggests that our reactions to a future confirmed discovery of microbial extraterrestrial life are likely to be fairly positive.",
keywords = "Affect, Extraterrestrial life, LIWC, Scientific discovery, Societal reactions",
author = "Kwon, {Jung Yul} and Bercovici, {Hannah L.} and Katja Cunningham and Michael Varnum",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "10",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02308",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "JAN",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How will we react to the discovery of extraterrestrial life?

AU - Kwon, Jung Yul

AU - Bercovici, Hannah L.

AU - Cunningham, Katja

AU - Varnum, Michael

PY - 2018/1/10

Y1 - 2018/1/10

N2 - How will humanity react to the discovery of extraterrestrial life? Speculation on this topic abounds, but empirical research is practically non-existent. We report the results of three empirical studies assessing psychological reactions to the discovery of extraterrestrial life using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) text analysis software. We examined language use in media coverage of past discovery announcements of this nature, with a focus on extraterrestrial microbial life (Pilot Study). A large online sample (N = 501) was asked to write about their own and humanity's reaction to a hypothetical announcement of such a discovery (Study 1), and an independent, large online sample (N = 256) was asked to read and respond to a newspaper story about the claim that fossilized extraterrestrial microbial life had been found in a meteorite of Martian origin (Study 2). Across these studies, we found that reactions were significantly more positive than negative, and more reward vs. risk oriented. A mini-meta-analysis revealed large overall effect sizes (positive vs. negative affect language: g = 0.98; reward vs. risk language: g = 0.81). We also found that people's forecasts of their own reactions showed a greater positivity bias than their forecasts of humanity's reactions (Study 1), and that responses to reading an actual announcement of the discovery of extraterrestrial microbial life showed a greater positivity bias than responses to reading an actual announcement of the creation of man-made synthetic life (Study 2). Taken together, this work suggests that our reactions to a future confirmed discovery of microbial extraterrestrial life are likely to be fairly positive.

AB - How will humanity react to the discovery of extraterrestrial life? Speculation on this topic abounds, but empirical research is practically non-existent. We report the results of three empirical studies assessing psychological reactions to the discovery of extraterrestrial life using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) text analysis software. We examined language use in media coverage of past discovery announcements of this nature, with a focus on extraterrestrial microbial life (Pilot Study). A large online sample (N = 501) was asked to write about their own and humanity's reaction to a hypothetical announcement of such a discovery (Study 1), and an independent, large online sample (N = 256) was asked to read and respond to a newspaper story about the claim that fossilized extraterrestrial microbial life had been found in a meteorite of Martian origin (Study 2). Across these studies, we found that reactions were significantly more positive than negative, and more reward vs. risk oriented. A mini-meta-analysis revealed large overall effect sizes (positive vs. negative affect language: g = 0.98; reward vs. risk language: g = 0.81). We also found that people's forecasts of their own reactions showed a greater positivity bias than their forecasts of humanity's reactions (Study 1), and that responses to reading an actual announcement of the discovery of extraterrestrial microbial life showed a greater positivity bias than responses to reading an actual announcement of the creation of man-made synthetic life (Study 2). Taken together, this work suggests that our reactions to a future confirmed discovery of microbial extraterrestrial life are likely to be fairly positive.

KW - Affect

KW - Extraterrestrial life

KW - LIWC

KW - Scientific discovery

KW - Societal reactions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040333653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040333653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02308

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02308

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040333653

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - JAN

M1 - 2308

ER -