How to investigate linguistic diversity: Lessons from the Pacific Northwest

Henry Davis, Carrie Gillon, Lisa Matthewson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

On the basis of five case studies from languages of the American Pacific Northwest, we argue that, at least in the areas of syntax and semantics, a scientific approach to the study of linguistic diversity must be empirically grounded in theoretically informed, hypothesis-driven fieldwork on individual languages. This runs counter to recent high-profile claims that large-scale typology based on the sampling of descriptive grammars yields superior results. We show that only a hypothesisdriven approach makes falsifiable predictions, and only a methodology that yields negative as well as positive evidence can effectively test those predictions. Targeted elicitation is particularly important for languages with a small number of speakers, where statistical analysis of large-scale corpora is impossible. Given that a large proportion of the world’s linguistic diversity is found in such languages, we conclude that formal, hypothesis-driven fieldwork constitutes the best way rapidly and efficiently to document the world’s remaining syntactic and semantic diversity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e180-e226
JournalLanguage
Volume90
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Keywords

  • Fieldwork
  • Methodology
  • Salish
  • Semantics
  • Syntax
  • Tsimshianic
  • Wakashan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How to investigate linguistic diversity: Lessons from the Pacific Northwest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this