Abstract

Sustainability challenges are multitudinous, urgent, and complex. They are beyond the capacities of our current institutions to address, caused by path-dependent behaviors, and require substantial change from systems with crippling inertia. These problems are born of large-scale industrial economic policy, the rise of materialism, and the supremacy of profit over sustainability. Currently, academia is poorly positioned to address sustainability problems because of anachronistic pedagogy, mismatched incentives, insufficient expertise, lack of personal commitment, and insular products and communication. What transformational methods for research and practice, which involve relevant communities throughout problem-solving processes in meaningful ways, does sustainability science offer? Though rhetoric outweighs real-world sustainability transitions so far, we argue that operationalizing the goals of the field, developing the necessary competencies, and seeking novel partnerships between society and the academy will position academic institutions to make a bigger impact on the transition to sustainability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-120
Number of pages6
JournalSustainability Science
Volume7
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Motivation
Teaching
rhetoric
Communication
sustainability
Economics
science
Research
materialism
economic policy
inertia
Economic Policy
academy
time
incentive
profit
expertise
communication
commitment
lack

Keywords

  • Actionable knowledge
  • Collaborative partnerships
  • Institutional development
  • Path dependency
  • Real-world impact
  • Sustainability science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Health(social science)
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Ecology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Global and Planetary Change

Cite this

How much time do we have? Urgency and rhetoric in sustainability science. / Van Der Leeuw, Sander; Wiek, Arnim; Harlow, John; Buizer, James.

In: Sustainability Science, Vol. 7, No. SUPPL. 1, 02.2012, p. 115-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7c829c176b84f88a0e700ad69025f38,
title = "How much time do we have? Urgency and rhetoric in sustainability science",
abstract = "Sustainability challenges are multitudinous, urgent, and complex. They are beyond the capacities of our current institutions to address, caused by path-dependent behaviors, and require substantial change from systems with crippling inertia. These problems are born of large-scale industrial economic policy, the rise of materialism, and the supremacy of profit over sustainability. Currently, academia is poorly positioned to address sustainability problems because of anachronistic pedagogy, mismatched incentives, insufficient expertise, lack of personal commitment, and insular products and communication. What transformational methods for research and practice, which involve relevant communities throughout problem-solving processes in meaningful ways, does sustainability science offer? Though rhetoric outweighs real-world sustainability transitions so far, we argue that operationalizing the goals of the field, developing the necessary competencies, and seeking novel partnerships between society and the academy will position academic institutions to make a bigger impact on the transition to sustainability.",
keywords = "Actionable knowledge, Collaborative partnerships, Institutional development, Path dependency, Real-world impact, Sustainability science",
author = "{Van Der Leeuw}, Sander and Arnim Wiek and John Harlow and James Buizer",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s11625-011-0153-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "115--120",
journal = "Sustainability Science",
issn = "1862-4065",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How much time do we have? Urgency and rhetoric in sustainability science

AU - Van Der Leeuw, Sander

AU - Wiek, Arnim

AU - Harlow, John

AU - Buizer, James

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Sustainability challenges are multitudinous, urgent, and complex. They are beyond the capacities of our current institutions to address, caused by path-dependent behaviors, and require substantial change from systems with crippling inertia. These problems are born of large-scale industrial economic policy, the rise of materialism, and the supremacy of profit over sustainability. Currently, academia is poorly positioned to address sustainability problems because of anachronistic pedagogy, mismatched incentives, insufficient expertise, lack of personal commitment, and insular products and communication. What transformational methods for research and practice, which involve relevant communities throughout problem-solving processes in meaningful ways, does sustainability science offer? Though rhetoric outweighs real-world sustainability transitions so far, we argue that operationalizing the goals of the field, developing the necessary competencies, and seeking novel partnerships between society and the academy will position academic institutions to make a bigger impact on the transition to sustainability.

AB - Sustainability challenges are multitudinous, urgent, and complex. They are beyond the capacities of our current institutions to address, caused by path-dependent behaviors, and require substantial change from systems with crippling inertia. These problems are born of large-scale industrial economic policy, the rise of materialism, and the supremacy of profit over sustainability. Currently, academia is poorly positioned to address sustainability problems because of anachronistic pedagogy, mismatched incentives, insufficient expertise, lack of personal commitment, and insular products and communication. What transformational methods for research and practice, which involve relevant communities throughout problem-solving processes in meaningful ways, does sustainability science offer? Though rhetoric outweighs real-world sustainability transitions so far, we argue that operationalizing the goals of the field, developing the necessary competencies, and seeking novel partnerships between society and the academy will position academic institutions to make a bigger impact on the transition to sustainability.

KW - Actionable knowledge

KW - Collaborative partnerships

KW - Institutional development

KW - Path dependency

KW - Real-world impact

KW - Sustainability science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857046923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857046923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11625-011-0153-1

DO - 10.1007/s11625-011-0153-1

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 115

EP - 120

JO - Sustainability Science

JF - Sustainability Science

SN - 1862-4065

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -