How much do universal anthropometric standards bias the global monitoring of obesity and undernutrition?

Daniel Hruschka, C. Hadley

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Each year, hundreds of articles in population health and nutrition, many in high-profile journals, use standard cutoffs based on weight and height as assessments of obesity and undernutrition. These global efforts to monitor overweight and underweight often rest on the assumption that ethnic differences in underlying body form are sufficiently small to permit universal anthropometric cutoffs for comparing excess and insufficient body fat across populations. However, a century of work in human biological variation suggests that human populations can vary dramatically in underlying body form in a way that may require population-sensitive cutoffs for monitoring. Here, we describe recently developed methods that can provide population-sensitive assessments of both excess and insufficient energy reserves in a wide range of countries. We use this approach to illustrate how worldwide variation in human body form is far more widespread than previously thought, and that it can occur at several geographic scales, including the level of world regions, countries and populations within countries. The findings also suggest that using standard cutoffs that ignore this variation can underestimate current obesity levels in adults by more than 400–500 million while also incorrectly prioritizing high-risk areas for undernutrition in children in key regions around the world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1030-1039
Number of pages10
JournalObesity Reviews
Volume17
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Malnutrition
Obesity
Vulnerable Populations
Population
Thinness
Human Body
Adipose Tissue
Weights and Measures
Health

Keywords

  • Anthropometric
  • body mass index
  • growth standards
  • undernutrition
  • weight-for-height

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

How much do universal anthropometric standards bias the global monitoring of obesity and undernutrition? / Hruschka, Daniel; Hadley, C.

In: Obesity Reviews, Vol. 17, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 1030-1039.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{508fe00805d54da5938a3ee803250dd3,
title = "How much do universal anthropometric standards bias the global monitoring of obesity and undernutrition?",
abstract = "Each year, hundreds of articles in population health and nutrition, many in high-profile journals, use standard cutoffs based on weight and height as assessments of obesity and undernutrition. These global efforts to monitor overweight and underweight often rest on the assumption that ethnic differences in underlying body form are sufficiently small to permit universal anthropometric cutoffs for comparing excess and insufficient body fat across populations. However, a century of work in human biological variation suggests that human populations can vary dramatically in underlying body form in a way that may require population-sensitive cutoffs for monitoring. Here, we describe recently developed methods that can provide population-sensitive assessments of both excess and insufficient energy reserves in a wide range of countries. We use this approach to illustrate how worldwide variation in human body form is far more widespread than previously thought, and that it can occur at several geographic scales, including the level of world regions, countries and populations within countries. The findings also suggest that using standard cutoffs that ignore this variation can underestimate current obesity levels in adults by more than 400–500 million while also incorrectly prioritizing high-risk areas for undernutrition in children in key regions around the world.",
keywords = "Anthropometric, body mass index, growth standards, undernutrition, weight-for-height",
author = "Daniel Hruschka and C. Hadley",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/obr.12449",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "1030--1039",
journal = "Obesity Reviews",
issn = "1467-7881",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How much do universal anthropometric standards bias the global monitoring of obesity and undernutrition?

AU - Hruschka, Daniel

AU - Hadley, C.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Each year, hundreds of articles in population health and nutrition, many in high-profile journals, use standard cutoffs based on weight and height as assessments of obesity and undernutrition. These global efforts to monitor overweight and underweight often rest on the assumption that ethnic differences in underlying body form are sufficiently small to permit universal anthropometric cutoffs for comparing excess and insufficient body fat across populations. However, a century of work in human biological variation suggests that human populations can vary dramatically in underlying body form in a way that may require population-sensitive cutoffs for monitoring. Here, we describe recently developed methods that can provide population-sensitive assessments of both excess and insufficient energy reserves in a wide range of countries. We use this approach to illustrate how worldwide variation in human body form is far more widespread than previously thought, and that it can occur at several geographic scales, including the level of world regions, countries and populations within countries. The findings also suggest that using standard cutoffs that ignore this variation can underestimate current obesity levels in adults by more than 400–500 million while also incorrectly prioritizing high-risk areas for undernutrition in children in key regions around the world.

AB - Each year, hundreds of articles in population health and nutrition, many in high-profile journals, use standard cutoffs based on weight and height as assessments of obesity and undernutrition. These global efforts to monitor overweight and underweight often rest on the assumption that ethnic differences in underlying body form are sufficiently small to permit universal anthropometric cutoffs for comparing excess and insufficient body fat across populations. However, a century of work in human biological variation suggests that human populations can vary dramatically in underlying body form in a way that may require population-sensitive cutoffs for monitoring. Here, we describe recently developed methods that can provide population-sensitive assessments of both excess and insufficient energy reserves in a wide range of countries. We use this approach to illustrate how worldwide variation in human body form is far more widespread than previously thought, and that it can occur at several geographic scales, including the level of world regions, countries and populations within countries. The findings also suggest that using standard cutoffs that ignore this variation can underestimate current obesity levels in adults by more than 400–500 million while also incorrectly prioritizing high-risk areas for undernutrition in children in key regions around the world.

KW - Anthropometric

KW - body mass index

KW - growth standards

KW - undernutrition

KW - weight-for-height

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990841970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990841970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/obr.12449

DO - 10.1111/obr.12449

M3 - Review article

VL - 17

SP - 1030

EP - 1039

JO - Obesity Reviews

JF - Obesity Reviews

SN - 1467-7881

IS - 11

ER -