How Molecular is Molecular Developmental Biology? A Reply to Alex Rosenberg's Reductionism Redux: Computing the Embryo

Manfred D. Laubichler; Günter P. Wagner

doi:10.1023/A:1006750126784

How Molecular is Molecular Developmental Biology? A Reply to Alex Rosenberg's Reductionism Redux: Computing the Embryo

Manfred D. Laubichler, Günter P. Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper argues in defense of the anti-reductionist consensus in the philosophy of biology. More specifically, it takes issues with Alex Rosenberg's recent challenge of this position. We argue that the results of modern developmental genetics rather than eliminating the need for functional kinds in explanations of development actually reinforce their importance.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	53-68
Number of pages	16
Journal	Biology and Philosophy
Volume	16
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006750126784
State	Published - Dec 1 2001
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Functional kinds
Molecular developmental biology
Physicalist antireductionism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Philosophy
Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
History and Philosophy of Science

Access to Document

10.1023/A:1006750126784

Cite this

@article{3e57e49a2f8a49c7809e8d460aab426a,

title = "How Molecular is Molecular Developmental Biology? A Reply to Alex Rosenberg's Reductionism Redux: Computing the Embryo",

abstract = "This paper argues in defense of the anti-reductionist consensus in the philosophy of biology. More specifically, it takes issues with Alex Rosenberg's recent challenge of this position. We argue that the results of modern developmental genetics rather than eliminating the need for functional kinds in explanations of development actually reinforce their importance.",

keywords = "Functional kinds, Molecular developmental biology, Physicalist antireductionism",

author = "Laubichler, {Manfred D.} and Wagner, {G{\"u}nter P.}",

year = "2001",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1023/A:1006750126784",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "16",

pages = "53--68",

journal = "Biology and Philosophy",

issn = "0169-3867",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Molecular is Molecular Developmental Biology? A Reply to Alex Rosenberg's Reductionism Redux

T2 - Computing the Embryo

AU - Laubichler, Manfred D.

AU - Wagner, Günter P.

PY - 2001/12/1

Y1 - 2001/12/1

N2 - This paper argues in defense of the anti-reductionist consensus in the philosophy of biology. More specifically, it takes issues with Alex Rosenberg's recent challenge of this position. We argue that the results of modern developmental genetics rather than eliminating the need for functional kinds in explanations of development actually reinforce their importance.

AB - This paper argues in defense of the anti-reductionist consensus in the philosophy of biology. More specifically, it takes issues with Alex Rosenberg's recent challenge of this position. We argue that the results of modern developmental genetics rather than eliminating the need for functional kinds in explanations of development actually reinforce their importance.

KW - Functional kinds

KW - Molecular developmental biology

KW - Physicalist antireductionism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0012976586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0012976586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1006750126784

DO - 10.1023/A:1006750126784

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0012976586

SN - 0169-3867

VL - 16

SP - 53

EP - 68

JO - Biology and Philosophy

JF - Biology and Philosophy

IS - 1

ER -

How Molecular is Molecular Developmental Biology? A Reply to Alex Rosenberg's Reductionism Redux: Computing the Embryo

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this