How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access

Wilhelm Peekhaus, Nicholas Proferes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper presents the inferential analysis of a systematic survey of North American library and information science (LIS) faculty awareness of, attitudes towards and experience with open-access scholarly publishing. The study reveals that engagement with open access is related to faculty rank and perceptions about tenure and promotion committee assessments of open-access publications. The perceived constraints of the tenure and promotion system within the academy impact LIS faculty engagement with open-access publishing in ways found in other academic disciplines. However, those who themselves engage with open access tend to assess publications in such venues more favourably than those without such publishing experience and are similarly more predisposed to believe that tenure and promotion committees would evaluate such publications favourably. Nonetheless, while in general it is clear that experience with open access reduces some of the concerns about the effects of this type of scholarly publishing on career opportunities, there remains a substantial amount of equivocacy among LIS faculty about open access.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)640-661
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Information Science
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 24 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Faculty authors
  • journals
  • library and information science faculty
  • open access
  • open-access publishing
  • scholarly communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this