How individuals respond to a liquidity shock: Evidence from the 2013 government shutdown

Michael Gelman, Shachar Kariv, Matthew D. Shapiro, Daniel Silverman, Steven Tadelis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Using comprehensive account records, this paper examines how individuals adjusted spending and saving in response to a temporary drop in liquidity due to the 2013 U.S. government shutdown. The shutdown cut paychecks by 40% for affected employees, which was recovered within 2 weeks. Because the shutdown affected only the timing of payments, it provides a distinctive experiment allowing estimates of the response to a liquidity shock holding income constant. Spending dropped sharply, implying a naïve estimate of 58 cents less spending for every dollar of lost liquidity. This estimate overstates the consumption response. While many individuals had low liquid assets, they used multiple sources of short-term liquidity to smooth consumption. Sources of short-term liquidity include delaying recurring payments such as for mortgages and credit card balances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Public Economics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Liquidity
Government
Liquidity shocks
Payment
Employees
Income
Experiment
Credit cards
Mortgages
Assets

Keywords

  • Account data
  • Consumption
  • Fiscal policy
  • Liquidity
  • Marginal propensity to spend
  • Naturally-occurring data
  • Spending

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

How individuals respond to a liquidity shock : Evidence from the 2013 government shutdown. / Gelman, Michael; Kariv, Shachar; Shapiro, Matthew D.; Silverman, Daniel; Tadelis, Steven.

In: Journal of Public Economics, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf5a2022d1de4255975071ca884ba141,
title = "How individuals respond to a liquidity shock: Evidence from the 2013 government shutdown",
abstract = "Using comprehensive account records, this paper examines how individuals adjusted spending and saving in response to a temporary drop in liquidity due to the 2013 U.S. government shutdown. The shutdown cut paychecks by 40{\%} for affected employees, which was recovered within 2 weeks. Because the shutdown affected only the timing of payments, it provides a distinctive experiment allowing estimates of the response to a liquidity shock holding income constant. Spending dropped sharply, implying a na{\"i}ve estimate of 58 cents less spending for every dollar of lost liquidity. This estimate overstates the consumption response. While many individuals had low liquid assets, they used multiple sources of short-term liquidity to smooth consumption. Sources of short-term liquidity include delaying recurring payments such as for mortgages and credit card balances.",
keywords = "Account data, Consumption, Fiscal policy, Liquidity, Marginal propensity to spend, Naturally-occurring data, Spending",
author = "Michael Gelman and Shachar Kariv and Shapiro, {Matthew D.} and Daniel Silverman and Steven Tadelis",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.06.007",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Public Economics",
issn = "0047-2727",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How individuals respond to a liquidity shock

T2 - Evidence from the 2013 government shutdown

AU - Gelman, Michael

AU - Kariv, Shachar

AU - Shapiro, Matthew D.

AU - Silverman, Daniel

AU - Tadelis, Steven

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Using comprehensive account records, this paper examines how individuals adjusted spending and saving in response to a temporary drop in liquidity due to the 2013 U.S. government shutdown. The shutdown cut paychecks by 40% for affected employees, which was recovered within 2 weeks. Because the shutdown affected only the timing of payments, it provides a distinctive experiment allowing estimates of the response to a liquidity shock holding income constant. Spending dropped sharply, implying a naïve estimate of 58 cents less spending for every dollar of lost liquidity. This estimate overstates the consumption response. While many individuals had low liquid assets, they used multiple sources of short-term liquidity to smooth consumption. Sources of short-term liquidity include delaying recurring payments such as for mortgages and credit card balances.

AB - Using comprehensive account records, this paper examines how individuals adjusted spending and saving in response to a temporary drop in liquidity due to the 2013 U.S. government shutdown. The shutdown cut paychecks by 40% for affected employees, which was recovered within 2 weeks. Because the shutdown affected only the timing of payments, it provides a distinctive experiment allowing estimates of the response to a liquidity shock holding income constant. Spending dropped sharply, implying a naïve estimate of 58 cents less spending for every dollar of lost liquidity. This estimate overstates the consumption response. While many individuals had low liquid assets, they used multiple sources of short-term liquidity to smooth consumption. Sources of short-term liquidity include delaying recurring payments such as for mortgages and credit card balances.

KW - Account data

KW - Consumption

KW - Fiscal policy

KW - Liquidity

KW - Marginal propensity to spend

KW - Naturally-occurring data

KW - Spending

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050402176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050402176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.06.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050402176

JO - Journal of Public Economics

JF - Journal of Public Economics

SN - 0047-2727

ER -