Abstract

In this exploratory study we examined the alignment of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) middle school engineering design standards with lesson ideas from middle school teachers, science education faculty, and engineering faculty (4–6 members per group). Respondents were prompted to provide plain language interpretations of two middle school Engineering Design performance expectations and to provide examples of how the performance expectations could be applied in middle school classrooms. Participants indicated the challenges and benefits of implementing these performance expectations and indicated personal experiences that helped them to interpret the performance expectations. Quality of lessons differed depending on the performance expectation being addressed. Generally, respondents were better able to generate ideas that addressed the paradigm of students ‘‘analyz[ing] data from tests to determine similarities and differences among several design solutions’’ than having students ‘‘define the criteria and constraints of a design problem.’’ A notable finding was the scarcity of quality engineering lesson ideas. The greatest proportion of lessons were categorized as Vague and/or Overly Broad. It appears that NGSS engineering design standards can too easily be decoded in an excessively expansive manner, thus resulting in indefinite ideas that are difficult to translate into classroom practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

engineering
performance
science
Students
classroom
group membership
student
Education
paradigm
interpretation
teacher
language
education
experience

Keywords

  • Engineering standards
  • Middle school
  • NGSS
  • Policy
  • Science standards
  • Standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{e319e966592e454ebd8126b86236b51e,
title = "How engineering standards are interpreted and translated for middle school",
abstract = "In this exploratory study we examined the alignment of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) middle school engineering design standards with lesson ideas from middle school teachers, science education faculty, and engineering faculty (4–6 members per group). Respondents were prompted to provide plain language interpretations of two middle school Engineering Design performance expectations and to provide examples of how the performance expectations could be applied in middle school classrooms. Participants indicated the challenges and benefits of implementing these performance expectations and indicated personal experiences that helped them to interpret the performance expectations. Quality of lessons differed depending on the performance expectation being addressed. Generally, respondents were better able to generate ideas that addressed the paradigm of students ‘‘analyz[ing] data from tests to determine similarities and differences among several design solutions’’ than having students ‘‘define the criteria and constraints of a design problem.’’ A notable finding was the scarcity of quality engineering lesson ideas. The greatest proportion of lessons were categorized as Vague and/or Overly Broad. It appears that NGSS engineering design standards can too easily be decoded in an excessively expansive manner, thus resulting in indefinite ideas that are difficult to translate into classroom practice.",
keywords = "Engineering standards, Middle school, NGSS, Policy, Science standards, Standards",
author = "Eugene Judson and John Ernzen and Stephen Krause and James Middleton and Robert Culbertson",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.7771/2157-9288.1121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research",
issn = "2157-9288",
publisher = "Purdue University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How engineering standards are interpreted and translated for middle school

AU - Judson, Eugene

AU - Ernzen, John

AU - Krause, Stephen

AU - Middleton, James

AU - Culbertson, Robert

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In this exploratory study we examined the alignment of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) middle school engineering design standards with lesson ideas from middle school teachers, science education faculty, and engineering faculty (4–6 members per group). Respondents were prompted to provide plain language interpretations of two middle school Engineering Design performance expectations and to provide examples of how the performance expectations could be applied in middle school classrooms. Participants indicated the challenges and benefits of implementing these performance expectations and indicated personal experiences that helped them to interpret the performance expectations. Quality of lessons differed depending on the performance expectation being addressed. Generally, respondents were better able to generate ideas that addressed the paradigm of students ‘‘analyz[ing] data from tests to determine similarities and differences among several design solutions’’ than having students ‘‘define the criteria and constraints of a design problem.’’ A notable finding was the scarcity of quality engineering lesson ideas. The greatest proportion of lessons were categorized as Vague and/or Overly Broad. It appears that NGSS engineering design standards can too easily be decoded in an excessively expansive manner, thus resulting in indefinite ideas that are difficult to translate into classroom practice.

AB - In this exploratory study we examined the alignment of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) middle school engineering design standards with lesson ideas from middle school teachers, science education faculty, and engineering faculty (4–6 members per group). Respondents were prompted to provide plain language interpretations of two middle school Engineering Design performance expectations and to provide examples of how the performance expectations could be applied in middle school classrooms. Participants indicated the challenges and benefits of implementing these performance expectations and indicated personal experiences that helped them to interpret the performance expectations. Quality of lessons differed depending on the performance expectation being addressed. Generally, respondents were better able to generate ideas that addressed the paradigm of students ‘‘analyz[ing] data from tests to determine similarities and differences among several design solutions’’ than having students ‘‘define the criteria and constraints of a design problem.’’ A notable finding was the scarcity of quality engineering lesson ideas. The greatest proportion of lessons were categorized as Vague and/or Overly Broad. It appears that NGSS engineering design standards can too easily be decoded in an excessively expansive manner, thus resulting in indefinite ideas that are difficult to translate into classroom practice.

KW - Engineering standards

KW - Middle school

KW - NGSS

KW - Policy

KW - Science standards

KW - Standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973513685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973513685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7771/2157-9288.1121

DO - 10.7771/2157-9288.1121

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research

JF - Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research

SN - 2157-9288

IS - 1

ER -