How "doing gender" leads to gender imbalances in the higher ranks in colleges of business [and how to "undo gender"]

Len J. Treviño, David B. Balkin, Luis Gomez-Mejia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Faculty gatekeepers who control promotions to senior academic positions in business schools are tenured associate and full professors, and their numbers are overwhelmingly male. This gender disparity in the higher ranks of academe can lead to masculinized organizational practices that frame tenure-and-promotion cases in business schools, leading to biased decision making that can undervalue female faculty members' scholarly contributions that do not conform to the taken-for-granted patterns established by successful males. We examine the evidence to determine the extent of the gender balance problem in senior positions in colleges of business in the US. In addition, we provide several conceptual frameworks; namely, homophily and hegemonic masculinities, and expectations state theory, social role theory, and shifting standards theory, which provide theoretical insights into how gender bias can unintentionally enter the promotion process in business schools. We provide a framework that business schools can implement to make decision making on promotion and advancement more equitable and engender a more welcoming environment for female faculty, ultimately caulking the "leaky pipeline" and allowing more female faculty to advance to the highest ranks of academe. Last, we offer new directions for research on attaining better gender balance in colleges of business.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-453
Number of pages15
JournalAcademy of Management Learning and Education
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

doing gender
business school
promotion
gender
role theory
decision making
gatekeeper
Social Role
masculinity
university teacher
Business schools
Imbalance
trend
evidence
Decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

How "doing gender" leads to gender imbalances in the higher ranks in colleges of business [and how to "undo gender"]. / Treviño, Len J.; Balkin, David B.; Gomez-Mejia, Luis.

In: Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 439-453.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{3ee44f3c15b643b89fcb397dd5fd91f1,
title = "How {"}doing gender{"} leads to gender imbalances in the higher ranks in colleges of business [and how to {"}undo gender{"}]",
abstract = "Faculty gatekeepers who control promotions to senior academic positions in business schools are tenured associate and full professors, and their numbers are overwhelmingly male. This gender disparity in the higher ranks of academe can lead to masculinized organizational practices that frame tenure-and-promotion cases in business schools, leading to biased decision making that can undervalue female faculty members' scholarly contributions that do not conform to the taken-for-granted patterns established by successful males. We examine the evidence to determine the extent of the gender balance problem in senior positions in colleges of business in the US. In addition, we provide several conceptual frameworks; namely, homophily and hegemonic masculinities, and expectations state theory, social role theory, and shifting standards theory, which provide theoretical insights into how gender bias can unintentionally enter the promotion process in business schools. We provide a framework that business schools can implement to make decision making on promotion and advancement more equitable and engender a more welcoming environment for female faculty, ultimately caulking the {"}leaky pipeline{"} and allowing more female faculty to advance to the highest ranks of academe. Last, we offer new directions for research on attaining better gender balance in colleges of business.",
author = "Trevi{\~n}o, {Len J.} and Balkin, {David B.} and Luis Gomez-Mejia",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amle.2015.0053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "439--453",
journal = "Academy of Management Learning and Education",
issn = "1537-260X",
publisher = "George Washington University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How "doing gender" leads to gender imbalances in the higher ranks in colleges of business [and how to "undo gender"]

AU - Treviño, Len J.

AU - Balkin, David B.

AU - Gomez-Mejia, Luis

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Faculty gatekeepers who control promotions to senior academic positions in business schools are tenured associate and full professors, and their numbers are overwhelmingly male. This gender disparity in the higher ranks of academe can lead to masculinized organizational practices that frame tenure-and-promotion cases in business schools, leading to biased decision making that can undervalue female faculty members' scholarly contributions that do not conform to the taken-for-granted patterns established by successful males. We examine the evidence to determine the extent of the gender balance problem in senior positions in colleges of business in the US. In addition, we provide several conceptual frameworks; namely, homophily and hegemonic masculinities, and expectations state theory, social role theory, and shifting standards theory, which provide theoretical insights into how gender bias can unintentionally enter the promotion process in business schools. We provide a framework that business schools can implement to make decision making on promotion and advancement more equitable and engender a more welcoming environment for female faculty, ultimately caulking the "leaky pipeline" and allowing more female faculty to advance to the highest ranks of academe. Last, we offer new directions for research on attaining better gender balance in colleges of business.

AB - Faculty gatekeepers who control promotions to senior academic positions in business schools are tenured associate and full professors, and their numbers are overwhelmingly male. This gender disparity in the higher ranks of academe can lead to masculinized organizational practices that frame tenure-and-promotion cases in business schools, leading to biased decision making that can undervalue female faculty members' scholarly contributions that do not conform to the taken-for-granted patterns established by successful males. We examine the evidence to determine the extent of the gender balance problem in senior positions in colleges of business in the US. In addition, we provide several conceptual frameworks; namely, homophily and hegemonic masculinities, and expectations state theory, social role theory, and shifting standards theory, which provide theoretical insights into how gender bias can unintentionally enter the promotion process in business schools. We provide a framework that business schools can implement to make decision making on promotion and advancement more equitable and engender a more welcoming environment for female faculty, ultimately caulking the "leaky pipeline" and allowing more female faculty to advance to the highest ranks of academe. Last, we offer new directions for research on attaining better gender balance in colleges of business.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031794611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031794611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/amle.2015.0053

DO - 10.5465/amle.2015.0053

M3 - Review article

VL - 16

SP - 439

EP - 453

JO - Academy of Management Learning and Education

JF - Academy of Management Learning and Education

SN - 1537-260X

IS - 3

ER -