How does collaborative group technology influence social network structure?

Mark Keith, Haluk Demirkan, Kenneth Goul

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationship between technology and elements of the formal organization structure has long been of interest to information systems and organization researchers. A less-studied issue is how technology may also influence the informal social network structure. This research examines how various types of technological expertise relate to an individual's network centrality in the project teams of 99 MBA, MISM, and MAIS students at a large public university. To further understand this relationship, the project task was varied in terms of "uncertainty" and the formal group structures in terms of departmentation. Results indicate that individuals who are proficient with various types of technologies tend to be more central in their class advice network. However, this relationship depends on both the level of task uncertainty and group departmentation. Implications are drawn for practice and research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Event41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2008, HICSS - Big Island, HI, United States
Duration: Jan 7 2008Jan 10 2008

Other

Other41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2008, HICSS
CountryUnited States
CityBig Island, HI
Period1/7/081/10/08

Fingerprint

Group technology
Information systems
Students
Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Keith, M., Demirkan, H., & Goul, K. (2008). How does collaborative group technology influence social network structure? In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences [4438761] https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.190

How does collaborative group technology influence social network structure? / Keith, Mark; Demirkan, Haluk; Goul, Kenneth.

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2008. 4438761.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Keith, M, Demirkan, H & Goul, K 2008, How does collaborative group technology influence social network structure? in Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences., 4438761, 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2008, HICSS, Big Island, HI, United States, 1/7/08. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.190
Keith M, Demirkan H, Goul K. How does collaborative group technology influence social network structure? In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2008. 4438761 https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.190
Keith, Mark ; Demirkan, Haluk ; Goul, Kenneth. / How does collaborative group technology influence social network structure?. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2008.
@inproceedings{14344218482348baad2c74d1af40d545,
title = "How does collaborative group technology influence social network structure?",
abstract = "The relationship between technology and elements of the formal organization structure has long been of interest to information systems and organization researchers. A less-studied issue is how technology may also influence the informal social network structure. This research examines how various types of technological expertise relate to an individual's network centrality in the project teams of 99 MBA, MISM, and MAIS students at a large public university. To further understand this relationship, the project task was varied in terms of {"}uncertainty{"} and the formal group structures in terms of departmentation. Results indicate that individuals who are proficient with various types of technologies tend to be more central in their class advice network. However, this relationship depends on both the level of task uncertainty and group departmentation. Implications are drawn for practice and research.",
author = "Mark Keith and Haluk Demirkan and Kenneth Goul",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1109/HICSS.2008.190",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0769530753",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - How does collaborative group technology influence social network structure?

AU - Keith, Mark

AU - Demirkan, Haluk

AU - Goul, Kenneth

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The relationship between technology and elements of the formal organization structure has long been of interest to information systems and organization researchers. A less-studied issue is how technology may also influence the informal social network structure. This research examines how various types of technological expertise relate to an individual's network centrality in the project teams of 99 MBA, MISM, and MAIS students at a large public university. To further understand this relationship, the project task was varied in terms of "uncertainty" and the formal group structures in terms of departmentation. Results indicate that individuals who are proficient with various types of technologies tend to be more central in their class advice network. However, this relationship depends on both the level of task uncertainty and group departmentation. Implications are drawn for practice and research.

AB - The relationship between technology and elements of the formal organization structure has long been of interest to information systems and organization researchers. A less-studied issue is how technology may also influence the informal social network structure. This research examines how various types of technological expertise relate to an individual's network centrality in the project teams of 99 MBA, MISM, and MAIS students at a large public university. To further understand this relationship, the project task was varied in terms of "uncertainty" and the formal group structures in terms of departmentation. Results indicate that individuals who are proficient with various types of technologies tend to be more central in their class advice network. However, this relationship depends on both the level of task uncertainty and group departmentation. Implications are drawn for practice and research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51449109232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51449109232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/HICSS.2008.190

DO - 10.1109/HICSS.2008.190

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0769530753

SN - 9780769530758

BT - Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

ER -