How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Do men and women academic faculty vary in their research collaboration patterns and strategies? This straightforward question does not lend itself to a straightforward answer. A great many sex-correlated variables could possibly mitigate the relationship of sex and collaboration. If one finds sex-correlated differences in the number of collaborators, can one infer that there is something intrinsic to men's and women's work strategies and preferences? Or would such differences owe instead to women's and men's different positions in work structures and hierarchies? The focus here is on two sets of research collaboration variables, numbers of collaborators and the collaboration strategies employed. The study uses questionnaire data from the U.S. National Survey of Academic Scientists (n = 1714) and tests several hypotheses about collaboration numbers and strategies. Regression results indicate, counter to the core hypotheses and almost all published literature, that in a properly specified model, one taking into account such factors as tenure, discipline, family status and doctoral cohort, women actually have somewhat more collaborators on average than do men. For both men and women, those with more industrial interactions and those affiliated with university research centers have more collaborators. Men and women differ in their collaborator choice strategies. Men are more likely to be oriented to "instrumental," and "experience" strategies, while both men and women are motivated by "mentoring" strategies. Regression analyses show that for both men and women, having a coherent collaborator choice strategy predicts the number of collaborators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1393-1402
Number of pages10
JournalResearch Policy
Volume40
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research collaboration
Factors
Interaction
Mentoring
Cohort
University research centers
Hypothesis test
Women and work
Intrinsic
Tenure
Questionnaire

Keywords

  • Academic research
  • Gender
  • Research collaboration
  • Researcher strategy
  • Sex

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

@article{dc84280bebc347bd878ee6900777ed6c,
title = "How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers",
abstract = "Do men and women academic faculty vary in their research collaboration patterns and strategies? This straightforward question does not lend itself to a straightforward answer. A great many sex-correlated variables could possibly mitigate the relationship of sex and collaboration. If one finds sex-correlated differences in the number of collaborators, can one infer that there is something intrinsic to men's and women's work strategies and preferences? Or would such differences owe instead to women's and men's different positions in work structures and hierarchies? The focus here is on two sets of research collaboration variables, numbers of collaborators and the collaboration strategies employed. The study uses questionnaire data from the U.S. National Survey of Academic Scientists (n = 1714) and tests several hypotheses about collaboration numbers and strategies. Regression results indicate, counter to the core hypotheses and almost all published literature, that in a properly specified model, one taking into account such factors as tenure, discipline, family status and doctoral cohort, women actually have somewhat more collaborators on average than do men. For both men and women, those with more industrial interactions and those affiliated with university research centers have more collaborators. Men and women differ in their collaborator choice strategies. Men are more likely to be oriented to {"}instrumental,{"} and {"}experience{"} strategies, while both men and women are motivated by {"}mentoring{"} strategies. Regression analyses show that for both men and women, having a coherent collaborator choice strategy predicts the number of collaborators.",
keywords = "Academic research, Gender, Research collaboration, Researcher strategy, Sex",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Monica Gaughan",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1393--1402",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Gaughan, Monica

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Do men and women academic faculty vary in their research collaboration patterns and strategies? This straightforward question does not lend itself to a straightforward answer. A great many sex-correlated variables could possibly mitigate the relationship of sex and collaboration. If one finds sex-correlated differences in the number of collaborators, can one infer that there is something intrinsic to men's and women's work strategies and preferences? Or would such differences owe instead to women's and men's different positions in work structures and hierarchies? The focus here is on two sets of research collaboration variables, numbers of collaborators and the collaboration strategies employed. The study uses questionnaire data from the U.S. National Survey of Academic Scientists (n = 1714) and tests several hypotheses about collaboration numbers and strategies. Regression results indicate, counter to the core hypotheses and almost all published literature, that in a properly specified model, one taking into account such factors as tenure, discipline, family status and doctoral cohort, women actually have somewhat more collaborators on average than do men. For both men and women, those with more industrial interactions and those affiliated with university research centers have more collaborators. Men and women differ in their collaborator choice strategies. Men are more likely to be oriented to "instrumental," and "experience" strategies, while both men and women are motivated by "mentoring" strategies. Regression analyses show that for both men and women, having a coherent collaborator choice strategy predicts the number of collaborators.

AB - Do men and women academic faculty vary in their research collaboration patterns and strategies? This straightforward question does not lend itself to a straightforward answer. A great many sex-correlated variables could possibly mitigate the relationship of sex and collaboration. If one finds sex-correlated differences in the number of collaborators, can one infer that there is something intrinsic to men's and women's work strategies and preferences? Or would such differences owe instead to women's and men's different positions in work structures and hierarchies? The focus here is on two sets of research collaboration variables, numbers of collaborators and the collaboration strategies employed. The study uses questionnaire data from the U.S. National Survey of Academic Scientists (n = 1714) and tests several hypotheses about collaboration numbers and strategies. Regression results indicate, counter to the core hypotheses and almost all published literature, that in a properly specified model, one taking into account such factors as tenure, discipline, family status and doctoral cohort, women actually have somewhat more collaborators on average than do men. For both men and women, those with more industrial interactions and those affiliated with university research centers have more collaborators. Men and women differ in their collaborator choice strategies. Men are more likely to be oriented to "instrumental," and "experience" strategies, while both men and women are motivated by "mentoring" strategies. Regression analyses show that for both men and women, having a coherent collaborator choice strategy predicts the number of collaborators.

KW - Academic research

KW - Gender

KW - Research collaboration

KW - Researcher strategy

KW - Sex

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80255138241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80255138241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80255138241

VL - 40

SP - 1393

EP - 1402

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 10

ER -