How do cause lawyers decide when and where to litigate on behalf of their cause?

Scott Barclay, Daniel Chomsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we begin to respond to the deceptively simple question: How do cause lawyers decide when and where to litigate on behalf of their cause? We consider the choice of location and timing faced by cause lawyers when more than one jurisdiction evinces a suitable legal environment for pursuing litigation on their cause. To consider this choice, we use evidence from the timing and actions of cause lawyers in the marriage equality cases in the United States from January 1990 through December 2004. And, we show the value in utilizing methods that are relatively novel in cause lawyering research-statistical models-to consider the apparent commonalities, beyond a suitable legal environment, across locations and time periods that might prompt cause lawyers into action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-620
Number of pages26
JournalLaw and Society Review
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

lawyer
cause
choice of location
jurisdiction
equality
marriage
evidence
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

How do cause lawyers decide when and where to litigate on behalf of their cause? / Barclay, Scott; Chomsky, Daniel.

In: Law and Society Review, Vol. 48, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 595-620.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca5c76dc024a43f6a8c1d673995723a0,
title = "How do cause lawyers decide when and where to litigate on behalf of their cause?",
abstract = "In this article, we begin to respond to the deceptively simple question: How do cause lawyers decide when and where to litigate on behalf of their cause? We consider the choice of location and timing faced by cause lawyers when more than one jurisdiction evinces a suitable legal environment for pursuing litigation on their cause. To consider this choice, we use evidence from the timing and actions of cause lawyers in the marriage equality cases in the United States from January 1990 through December 2004. And, we show the value in utilizing methods that are relatively novel in cause lawyering research-statistical models-to consider the apparent commonalities, beyond a suitable legal environment, across locations and time periods that might prompt cause lawyers into action.",
author = "Scott Barclay and Daniel Chomsky",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/lasr.12093",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "595--620",
journal = "Law and Society Review",
issn = "0023-9216",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do cause lawyers decide when and where to litigate on behalf of their cause?

AU - Barclay, Scott

AU - Chomsky, Daniel

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - In this article, we begin to respond to the deceptively simple question: How do cause lawyers decide when and where to litigate on behalf of their cause? We consider the choice of location and timing faced by cause lawyers when more than one jurisdiction evinces a suitable legal environment for pursuing litigation on their cause. To consider this choice, we use evidence from the timing and actions of cause lawyers in the marriage equality cases in the United States from January 1990 through December 2004. And, we show the value in utilizing methods that are relatively novel in cause lawyering research-statistical models-to consider the apparent commonalities, beyond a suitable legal environment, across locations and time periods that might prompt cause lawyers into action.

AB - In this article, we begin to respond to the deceptively simple question: How do cause lawyers decide when and where to litigate on behalf of their cause? We consider the choice of location and timing faced by cause lawyers when more than one jurisdiction evinces a suitable legal environment for pursuing litigation on their cause. To consider this choice, we use evidence from the timing and actions of cause lawyers in the marriage equality cases in the United States from January 1990 through December 2004. And, we show the value in utilizing methods that are relatively novel in cause lawyering research-statistical models-to consider the apparent commonalities, beyond a suitable legal environment, across locations and time periods that might prompt cause lawyers into action.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906551947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906551947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/lasr.12093

DO - 10.1111/lasr.12093

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 595

EP - 620

JO - Law and Society Review

JF - Law and Society Review

SN - 0023-9216

IS - 3

ER -