How do ants stick out their tongues?

Jürgen Paul, Flavio Roces, Berthold Hoelldobler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The mouthparts are very important tools for almost any task performed by ants. In particular, the labiomaxillary complex is essential for food intake. In the present study we investigated the anatomical design of the labiomaxillary complex in various ant species, focusing on movement mechanisms. Six labial and six maxillary muscles with different functions control the several joints and ensure the proper performance of the labiomaxillary complex. According to our measurements of sarcomere lengths, muscle fiber lengths and diameters, and the relative muscle volumes, the labial and maxillary muscles feature rather slow than fast muscle characteristics and do not seem to be specialized for specific tasks. Since glossa protractor muscles are absent, the protraction of the glossa, the distal end of the labium, is a nonmuscular movement. By histological measurements of hemolymph volumes we could exclude a pressure-driven mechanism. Additional experiments showed that, upon relaxation of the glossa retractor muscles, the glossa protracts elastically. This elastic mechanism possibly sets an upper limit to licking frequency, thus influencing food intake rates and ultimately foraging behavior. In contrast to many other elastic mechanisms among arthropods, glossa protraction in ants is based on a mechanism where elasticity works as an actual antagonist to muscles. We compared the design of the labiomaxillary complex of ants with that of the honeybee and suggest an elastic mechanism for glossa protraction in honeybees as well. J. Morphol. 254:39-52, 2002.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-52
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Morphology
Volume254
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ants
tongue
Tongue
Formicidae
Muscles
muscles
lips
honey bees
Lip
food intake
Eating
sarcomeres
mouthparts
Sarcomeres
elasticity (mechanics)
Hemolymph
Arthropods
muscle fibers
joints (animal)
Elasticity

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Elastic mechanism
  • Glossa
  • Hemolymph pressure
  • Insect
  • Mouthparts
  • Movement
  • Muscle fiber
  • Trophallaxis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental Biology
  • Anatomy

Cite this

How do ants stick out their tongues? / Paul, Jürgen; Roces, Flavio; Hoelldobler, Berthold.

In: Journal of Morphology, Vol. 254, No. 1, 01.10.2002, p. 39-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Paul, Jürgen ; Roces, Flavio ; Hoelldobler, Berthold. / How do ants stick out their tongues?. In: Journal of Morphology. 2002 ; Vol. 254, No. 1. pp. 39-52.
@article{e99311d8ab774a629d0701c4ff33a6c3,
title = "How do ants stick out their tongues?",
abstract = "The mouthparts are very important tools for almost any task performed by ants. In particular, the labiomaxillary complex is essential for food intake. In the present study we investigated the anatomical design of the labiomaxillary complex in various ant species, focusing on movement mechanisms. Six labial and six maxillary muscles with different functions control the several joints and ensure the proper performance of the labiomaxillary complex. According to our measurements of sarcomere lengths, muscle fiber lengths and diameters, and the relative muscle volumes, the labial and maxillary muscles feature rather slow than fast muscle characteristics and do not seem to be specialized for specific tasks. Since glossa protractor muscles are absent, the protraction of the glossa, the distal end of the labium, is a nonmuscular movement. By histological measurements of hemolymph volumes we could exclude a pressure-driven mechanism. Additional experiments showed that, upon relaxation of the glossa retractor muscles, the glossa protracts elastically. This elastic mechanism possibly sets an upper limit to licking frequency, thus influencing food intake rates and ultimately foraging behavior. In contrast to many other elastic mechanisms among arthropods, glossa protraction in ants is based on a mechanism where elasticity works as an actual antagonist to muscles. We compared the design of the labiomaxillary complex of ants with that of the honeybee and suggest an elastic mechanism for glossa protraction in honeybees as well. J. Morphol. 254:39-52, 2002.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Elastic mechanism, Glossa, Hemolymph pressure, Insect, Mouthparts, Movement, Muscle fiber, Trophallaxis",
author = "J{\"u}rgen Paul and Flavio Roces and Berthold Hoelldobler",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jmor.10011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "254",
pages = "39--52",
journal = "Journal of Morphology",
issn = "0362-2525",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do ants stick out their tongues?

AU - Paul, Jürgen

AU - Roces, Flavio

AU - Hoelldobler, Berthold

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - The mouthparts are very important tools for almost any task performed by ants. In particular, the labiomaxillary complex is essential for food intake. In the present study we investigated the anatomical design of the labiomaxillary complex in various ant species, focusing on movement mechanisms. Six labial and six maxillary muscles with different functions control the several joints and ensure the proper performance of the labiomaxillary complex. According to our measurements of sarcomere lengths, muscle fiber lengths and diameters, and the relative muscle volumes, the labial and maxillary muscles feature rather slow than fast muscle characteristics and do not seem to be specialized for specific tasks. Since glossa protractor muscles are absent, the protraction of the glossa, the distal end of the labium, is a nonmuscular movement. By histological measurements of hemolymph volumes we could exclude a pressure-driven mechanism. Additional experiments showed that, upon relaxation of the glossa retractor muscles, the glossa protracts elastically. This elastic mechanism possibly sets an upper limit to licking frequency, thus influencing food intake rates and ultimately foraging behavior. In contrast to many other elastic mechanisms among arthropods, glossa protraction in ants is based on a mechanism where elasticity works as an actual antagonist to muscles. We compared the design of the labiomaxillary complex of ants with that of the honeybee and suggest an elastic mechanism for glossa protraction in honeybees as well. J. Morphol. 254:39-52, 2002.

AB - The mouthparts are very important tools for almost any task performed by ants. In particular, the labiomaxillary complex is essential for food intake. In the present study we investigated the anatomical design of the labiomaxillary complex in various ant species, focusing on movement mechanisms. Six labial and six maxillary muscles with different functions control the several joints and ensure the proper performance of the labiomaxillary complex. According to our measurements of sarcomere lengths, muscle fiber lengths and diameters, and the relative muscle volumes, the labial and maxillary muscles feature rather slow than fast muscle characteristics and do not seem to be specialized for specific tasks. Since glossa protractor muscles are absent, the protraction of the glossa, the distal end of the labium, is a nonmuscular movement. By histological measurements of hemolymph volumes we could exclude a pressure-driven mechanism. Additional experiments showed that, upon relaxation of the glossa retractor muscles, the glossa protracts elastically. This elastic mechanism possibly sets an upper limit to licking frequency, thus influencing food intake rates and ultimately foraging behavior. In contrast to many other elastic mechanisms among arthropods, glossa protraction in ants is based on a mechanism where elasticity works as an actual antagonist to muscles. We compared the design of the labiomaxillary complex of ants with that of the honeybee and suggest an elastic mechanism for glossa protraction in honeybees as well. J. Morphol. 254:39-52, 2002.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Elastic mechanism

KW - Glossa

KW - Hemolymph pressure

KW - Insect

KW - Mouthparts

KW - Movement

KW - Muscle fiber

KW - Trophallaxis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036792921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036792921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmor.10011

DO - 10.1002/jmor.10011

M3 - Article

VL - 254

SP - 39

EP - 52

JO - Journal of Morphology

JF - Journal of Morphology

SN - 0362-2525

IS - 1

ER -