How data-driven reform can drive deficit thinking

Melanie Bertrand, Julie Marsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Propelled by accountability policies, leaders have touted data-driven decision making as a means to improve K-12 student outcomes and drive equity, as teachers analyze data to change instruction. However, many data-driven decision-making reforms have failed to challenge inequity. Melanie Bertrand and Julie Marsh’s study of six middle schools shows that teachers’ deficit thinking about emergent bilingual students, students with disabilities, and “struggling” students contributes to this failure of data reforms. They argue that blaming these groups for test scores ultimately works to uphold systemic racism, white supremacy, and other forms of injustice, and they conclude by offering recommendations for policy and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-39
Number of pages5
JournalPhi Delta Kappan
Volume102
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2021

Keywords

  • accountability
  • data-driven
  • deficit thinking
  • equity
  • improvement
  • racism
  • students of color
  • white supremacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How data-driven reform can drive deficit thinking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this