How Bad Apples Promote Bad Barrels

Unethical Leader Behavior and the Selective Attrition Effect

Robert Cialdini, Yexin Jessica Li, Adriana Samper, Edward Wellman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We present a theoretical rationale and supporting studies revealing how unethical leader behavior fosters an unethical climate within workgroups that increases member turnover intentions and malfeasance. Drawing on the attraction–selection–attrition model of organizational behavior, we propose a selective attrition effect whereby unethical leader behavior results in the retention of group members who are more comfortable with dishonesty and, consequently, more likely to engage in unethical behavior toward their group. In two experiments, exposure to unethical leader behavior (vs. ethical leader behavior) increased group members’ likelihood of choosing to leave the group. Members who chose to remain in a group with an unethical leader were more likely than those who chose to leave to cheat their group in a subsequent task. A two time-period survey replicated these findings and identified psychological distress as the mechanism driving group members’ turnover intentions. This research extends our understanding of the complex relationships between unethical leadership and follower turnover intentions, psychological distress, and malfeasance. We contribute to the behavioral ethics literature by identifying a previously underappreciated form of selective attrition that produces internal costs to groups and organizations, independent of reputational consequences and whether the unethicality is publicized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

leader
turnover
group membership
Group
organizational behavior
follower
moral philosophy
Attrition
climate
leadership
experiment
costs
Intentions
Turnover
Turnover intention
Psychological Distress
Psychological distress

Keywords

  • Malfeasance
  • Turnover intentions
  • Unethical behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law

Cite this

How Bad Apples Promote Bad Barrels : Unethical Leader Behavior and the Selective Attrition Effect. / Cialdini, Robert; Li, Yexin Jessica; Samper, Adriana; Wellman, Edward.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{02e4c65d6fe64d93b5c19179370285f1,
title = "How Bad Apples Promote Bad Barrels: Unethical Leader Behavior and the Selective Attrition Effect",
abstract = "We present a theoretical rationale and supporting studies revealing how unethical leader behavior fosters an unethical climate within workgroups that increases member turnover intentions and malfeasance. Drawing on the attraction–selection–attrition model of organizational behavior, we propose a selective attrition effect whereby unethical leader behavior results in the retention of group members who are more comfortable with dishonesty and, consequently, more likely to engage in unethical behavior toward their group. In two experiments, exposure to unethical leader behavior (vs. ethical leader behavior) increased group members’ likelihood of choosing to leave the group. Members who chose to remain in a group with an unethical leader were more likely than those who chose to leave to cheat their group in a subsequent task. A two time-period survey replicated these findings and identified psychological distress as the mechanism driving group members’ turnover intentions. This research extends our understanding of the complex relationships between unethical leadership and follower turnover intentions, psychological distress, and malfeasance. We contribute to the behavioral ethics literature by identifying a previously underappreciated form of selective attrition that produces internal costs to groups and organizations, independent of reputational consequences and whether the unethicality is publicized.",
keywords = "Malfeasance, Turnover intentions, Unethical behavior",
author = "Robert Cialdini and Li, {Yexin Jessica} and Adriana Samper and Edward Wellman",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-019-04252-2",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Bad Apples Promote Bad Barrels

T2 - Unethical Leader Behavior and the Selective Attrition Effect

AU - Cialdini, Robert

AU - Li, Yexin Jessica

AU - Samper, Adriana

AU - Wellman, Edward

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - We present a theoretical rationale and supporting studies revealing how unethical leader behavior fosters an unethical climate within workgroups that increases member turnover intentions and malfeasance. Drawing on the attraction–selection–attrition model of organizational behavior, we propose a selective attrition effect whereby unethical leader behavior results in the retention of group members who are more comfortable with dishonesty and, consequently, more likely to engage in unethical behavior toward their group. In two experiments, exposure to unethical leader behavior (vs. ethical leader behavior) increased group members’ likelihood of choosing to leave the group. Members who chose to remain in a group with an unethical leader were more likely than those who chose to leave to cheat their group in a subsequent task. A two time-period survey replicated these findings and identified psychological distress as the mechanism driving group members’ turnover intentions. This research extends our understanding of the complex relationships between unethical leadership and follower turnover intentions, psychological distress, and malfeasance. We contribute to the behavioral ethics literature by identifying a previously underappreciated form of selective attrition that produces internal costs to groups and organizations, independent of reputational consequences and whether the unethicality is publicized.

AB - We present a theoretical rationale and supporting studies revealing how unethical leader behavior fosters an unethical climate within workgroups that increases member turnover intentions and malfeasance. Drawing on the attraction–selection–attrition model of organizational behavior, we propose a selective attrition effect whereby unethical leader behavior results in the retention of group members who are more comfortable with dishonesty and, consequently, more likely to engage in unethical behavior toward their group. In two experiments, exposure to unethical leader behavior (vs. ethical leader behavior) increased group members’ likelihood of choosing to leave the group. Members who chose to remain in a group with an unethical leader were more likely than those who chose to leave to cheat their group in a subsequent task. A two time-period survey replicated these findings and identified psychological distress as the mechanism driving group members’ turnover intentions. This research extends our understanding of the complex relationships between unethical leadership and follower turnover intentions, psychological distress, and malfeasance. We contribute to the behavioral ethics literature by identifying a previously underappreciated form of selective attrition that produces internal costs to groups and organizations, independent of reputational consequences and whether the unethicality is publicized.

KW - Malfeasance

KW - Turnover intentions

KW - Unethical behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069441317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069441317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-019-04252-2

DO - 10.1007/s10551-019-04252-2

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

ER -