Abstract

Philip Hefner identifies three settings in which to assess the future of science and religion: the academy, the public sphere, and the faith community. This essay argues that the discourse of science and religion could improve its standing within the secular academy in America by shifting the focus from theology to history. In the public sphere, the science-and-religion discourse could play an important role of promoting tolerance and respect toward the religious Other. For a given faith community (for example, Judaism) the discourse of science and religion can ensure future intellectual depth by virtue of study and ongoing interpretation. The essay challenges the suggestion to adopt irony as a desirable posture for science-and-religion discourse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-461
Number of pages14
JournalZygon
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Religion
history
science
discourse
academy
faith
Judaism
irony
theology
community
tolerance
respect
History
interpretation
Discourse
Communities of Faith
Public Sphere

Keywords

  • Anti-Semitism
  • Aristotle
  • Conflict model
  • Darwinism
  • Early modern science and technology
  • Hayden White
  • Irony
  • Judaism (Reform, Modern Orthodox, Ultra-Orthodox)
  • Natural philosophy
  • Philip Hefner
  • Religion
  • Science
  • Secularism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies
  • Cultural Studies
  • Education

Cite this

History and the future of science and religion. / Samuelson, Hava.

In: Zygon, Vol. 45, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 448-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Samuelson, Hava. / History and the future of science and religion. In: Zygon. 2010 ; Vol. 45, No. 2. pp. 448-461.
@article{262347ab0e894e77ad2e822f70661035,
title = "History and the future of science and religion",
abstract = "Philip Hefner identifies three settings in which to assess the future of science and religion: the academy, the public sphere, and the faith community. This essay argues that the discourse of science and religion could improve its standing within the secular academy in America by shifting the focus from theology to history. In the public sphere, the science-and-religion discourse could play an important role of promoting tolerance and respect toward the religious Other. For a given faith community (for example, Judaism) the discourse of science and religion can ensure future intellectual depth by virtue of study and ongoing interpretation. The essay challenges the suggestion to adopt irony as a desirable posture for science-and-religion discourse.",
keywords = "Anti-Semitism, Aristotle, Conflict model, Darwinism, Early modern science and technology, Hayden White, Irony, Judaism (Reform, Modern Orthodox, Ultra-Orthodox), Natural philosophy, Philip Hefner, Religion, Science, Secularism",
author = "Hava Samuelson",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01094.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "448--461",
journal = "Zygon",
issn = "0591-2385",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - History and the future of science and religion

AU - Samuelson, Hava

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Philip Hefner identifies three settings in which to assess the future of science and religion: the academy, the public sphere, and the faith community. This essay argues that the discourse of science and religion could improve its standing within the secular academy in America by shifting the focus from theology to history. In the public sphere, the science-and-religion discourse could play an important role of promoting tolerance and respect toward the religious Other. For a given faith community (for example, Judaism) the discourse of science and religion can ensure future intellectual depth by virtue of study and ongoing interpretation. The essay challenges the suggestion to adopt irony as a desirable posture for science-and-religion discourse.

AB - Philip Hefner identifies three settings in which to assess the future of science and religion: the academy, the public sphere, and the faith community. This essay argues that the discourse of science and religion could improve its standing within the secular academy in America by shifting the focus from theology to history. In the public sphere, the science-and-religion discourse could play an important role of promoting tolerance and respect toward the religious Other. For a given faith community (for example, Judaism) the discourse of science and religion can ensure future intellectual depth by virtue of study and ongoing interpretation. The essay challenges the suggestion to adopt irony as a desirable posture for science-and-religion discourse.

KW - Anti-Semitism

KW - Aristotle

KW - Conflict model

KW - Darwinism

KW - Early modern science and technology

KW - Hayden White

KW - Irony

KW - Judaism (Reform, Modern Orthodox, Ultra-Orthodox)

KW - Natural philosophy

KW - Philip Hefner

KW - Religion

KW - Science

KW - Secularism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955823802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955823802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01094.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01094.x

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 448

EP - 461

JO - Zygon

JF - Zygon

SN - 0591-2385

IS - 2

ER -