15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Enhancing the responsiveness of science and innovation programs to societal values is a critical element of responsible innovation. Distinct from laboratory-level research into socio-technical integration, this paper focuses on integration and responsiveness at the level of research priority setting. Taking the case of nanotechnology, it evaluates decision-making in the USA and the UK in the wake of novel policy initiatives for societal research and engagement. It asks to what extent decision-makers explicitly reflected upon societal considerations during priority setting and allocation. Interviews with key decision-makers and staff reveal limited integration of societal actors and considerations during research prioritization. In response to a pervasive history of institutional practices that preclude socio-technical integration, and in contrast to concerns that such considerations may slow down R&D, we propose that building responsiveness into research prioritization can support productivity, contribute to more socially robust outcomes, and possibly even enhance national competitiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberscu017
Pages (from-to)72-85
Number of pages14
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
prioritization
decision maker
innovation
competitiveness
productivity
decision making
staff
history
interview
science
Values

Keywords

  • Nanotechnology
  • Research priority setting
  • Responsible innovation
  • Socio-technical integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within US and UK nanotechnology research priority setting. / Fisher, Erik; Maricle, G.

In: Science and Public Policy, Vol. 42, No. 1, scu017, 01.02.2015, p. 72-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e05d740698f463ba48db3314dce58ee,
title = "Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within US and UK nanotechnology research priority setting",
abstract = "Enhancing the responsiveness of science and innovation programs to societal values is a critical element of responsible innovation. Distinct from laboratory-level research into socio-technical integration, this paper focuses on integration and responsiveness at the level of research priority setting. Taking the case of nanotechnology, it evaluates decision-making in the USA and the UK in the wake of novel policy initiatives for societal research and engagement. It asks to what extent decision-makers explicitly reflected upon societal considerations during priority setting and allocation. Interviews with key decision-makers and staff reveal limited integration of societal actors and considerations during research prioritization. In response to a pervasive history of institutional practices that preclude socio-technical integration, and in contrast to concerns that such considerations may slow down R&D, we propose that building responsiveness into research prioritization can support productivity, contribute to more socially robust outcomes, and possibly even enhance national competitiveness.",
keywords = "Nanotechnology, Research priority setting, Responsible innovation, Socio-technical integration",
author = "Erik Fisher and G. Maricle",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/scipol/scu017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "72--85",
journal = "Science and Public Policy",
issn = "0302-3427",
publisher = "Beech Tree Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within US and UK nanotechnology research priority setting

AU - Fisher, Erik

AU - Maricle, G.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Enhancing the responsiveness of science and innovation programs to societal values is a critical element of responsible innovation. Distinct from laboratory-level research into socio-technical integration, this paper focuses on integration and responsiveness at the level of research priority setting. Taking the case of nanotechnology, it evaluates decision-making in the USA and the UK in the wake of novel policy initiatives for societal research and engagement. It asks to what extent decision-makers explicitly reflected upon societal considerations during priority setting and allocation. Interviews with key decision-makers and staff reveal limited integration of societal actors and considerations during research prioritization. In response to a pervasive history of institutional practices that preclude socio-technical integration, and in contrast to concerns that such considerations may slow down R&D, we propose that building responsiveness into research prioritization can support productivity, contribute to more socially robust outcomes, and possibly even enhance national competitiveness.

AB - Enhancing the responsiveness of science and innovation programs to societal values is a critical element of responsible innovation. Distinct from laboratory-level research into socio-technical integration, this paper focuses on integration and responsiveness at the level of research priority setting. Taking the case of nanotechnology, it evaluates decision-making in the USA and the UK in the wake of novel policy initiatives for societal research and engagement. It asks to what extent decision-makers explicitly reflected upon societal considerations during priority setting and allocation. Interviews with key decision-makers and staff reveal limited integration of societal actors and considerations during research prioritization. In response to a pervasive history of institutional practices that preclude socio-technical integration, and in contrast to concerns that such considerations may slow down R&D, we propose that building responsiveness into research prioritization can support productivity, contribute to more socially robust outcomes, and possibly even enhance national competitiveness.

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - Research priority setting

KW - Responsible innovation

KW - Socio-technical integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928951368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928951368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/scipol/scu017

DO - 10.1093/scipol/scu017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928951368

VL - 42

SP - 72

EP - 85

JO - Science and Public Policy

JF - Science and Public Policy

SN - 0302-3427

IS - 1

M1 - scu017

ER -