TY - JOUR
T1 - High Accuracy Indicators of Androgen Suppression Therapy Failure for Prostate Cancer—A Modeling Study
AU - Meade, William
AU - Weber, Allison
AU - Phan, Tin
AU - Hampston, Emily
AU - Resa, Laura Figueroa
AU - Nagy, John
AU - Kuang, Yang
N1 - Funding Information:
W.M.: A.W. and E.H. were supported partially by the Research Experience for Undergraduate program, (AM)^2 REU, at Arizona State University, which is partially supported by the NSF grant DMS-1757663. T.P. is supported by the director’s postdoctoral fellowship at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Y.K. is partially supported by the US National Science Foundation Rules of Life program DEB-1930728 and the NIH grant 5R01GM131405-02.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Prostate cancer is a serious public health concern in the United States. The primary obstacle to effective long-term management for prostate cancer patients is the eventual development of treatment resistance. Due to the uniquely chaotic nature of the neoplastic genome, it is difficult to determine the evolution of tumor composition over the course of treatment. Hence, a drug is often applied continuously past the point of effectiveness, thereby losing any potential treatment combination with that drug permanently to resistance. If a clinician is aware of the timing of resistance to a particular drug, then they may have a crucial opportunity to adjust the treatment to retain the drug’s usefulness in a potential treatment combination or strategy. In this study, we investigate new methods of predicting treatment failure due to treatment resistance using a novel mechanistic model built on an evolutionary interpretation of Droop cell quota theory. We analyze our proposed methods using patient PSA and androgen data from a clinical trial of intermittent treatment with androgen deprivation therapy. Our results produce two indicators of treatment failure. The first indicator, proposed from the evolutionary nature of the cancer population, is calculated using our mathematical model with a predictive accuracy of 87.3% (sensitivity: 96.1%, specificity: 65%). The second indicator, conjectured from the implication of the first indicator, is calculated directly from serum androgen and PSA data with a predictive accuracy of 88.7% (sensitivity: 90.2%, specificity: 85%). Our results demonstrate the potential and feasibility of using an evolutionary tumor dynamics model in combination with the appropriate data to aid in the adaptive management of prostate cancer.
AB - Prostate cancer is a serious public health concern in the United States. The primary obstacle to effective long-term management for prostate cancer patients is the eventual development of treatment resistance. Due to the uniquely chaotic nature of the neoplastic genome, it is difficult to determine the evolution of tumor composition over the course of treatment. Hence, a drug is often applied continuously past the point of effectiveness, thereby losing any potential treatment combination with that drug permanently to resistance. If a clinician is aware of the timing of resistance to a particular drug, then they may have a crucial opportunity to adjust the treatment to retain the drug’s usefulness in a potential treatment combination or strategy. In this study, we investigate new methods of predicting treatment failure due to treatment resistance using a novel mechanistic model built on an evolutionary interpretation of Droop cell quota theory. We analyze our proposed methods using patient PSA and androgen data from a clinical trial of intermittent treatment with androgen deprivation therapy. Our results produce two indicators of treatment failure. The first indicator, proposed from the evolutionary nature of the cancer population, is calculated using our mathematical model with a predictive accuracy of 87.3% (sensitivity: 96.1%, specificity: 65%). The second indicator, conjectured from the implication of the first indicator, is calculated directly from serum androgen and PSA data with a predictive accuracy of 88.7% (sensitivity: 90.2%, specificity: 85%). Our results demonstrate the potential and feasibility of using an evolutionary tumor dynamics model in combination with the appropriate data to aid in the adaptive management of prostate cancer.
KW - adaptive cancer management
KW - dynamic indicator of treatment failure
KW - evolutionary cell quota framework
KW - mechanistic model of prostate cancer
KW - predictive modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137323979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137323979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers14164033
DO - 10.3390/cancers14164033
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137323979
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 14
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 16
M1 - 4033
ER -