Heavy lies the crown? How job anxiety affects top executive decision making in gain and loss contexts

Michael J. Mannor, Adam J. Wowak, Viva Ona Bartkus, Luis Gomez-Mejia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research summary: Despite abundant anecdotal evidence that many top executives experience anxiety in their jobs, the upper echelons literature has remained largely silent on the organizational implications of executive job anxiety. In this study, we theorize that job anxiety will cause executives to (1) create a social buffer against threats by surrounding themselves with supportive decision-making teams, and (2) pursue lower-risk firm strategies. We further argue that these effects will vary depending upon whether strategic decisions occur in gain versus loss contexts. We test our ideas using a novel multisource, multimethod approach that includes data from 84 top executives of large organizations, their decision-making teams, their friends and families, and archival sources. Results from an analysis of 154 major strategic decisions provide general support for our theory. Managerial summary: Although many top executives experience anxiety in their jobs, some struggle more with anxiety than others. Our paper is the first to focus on how job anxiety affects executives' decisions. We analyze 154 major strategic decisions made by 84 top executives of large organizations in a range of industries, collecting data from personal interviews with executives and surveys of their decision-making teams, spouses, and friends. We find that anxious executives take fewer strategic risks, especially when things are going well. We further argue that anxious executives focus more on “buffering” themselves from threats, and find that they surround themselves with close supporters when times are tough. Our results demonstrate a pattern through which anxiety causes top executives to focus more heavily on avoiding potential threats.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1968-1989
Number of pages22
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume37
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Decision making
Team decision making
Threat
Strategic decisions
Multi-method
Upper echelons
Strategic risk
Spouses
Buffer
Firm strategy
Industry data

Keywords

  • behavioral decision theory
  • CEOs
  • job anxiety
  • strategic decision making
  • upper echelons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Heavy lies the crown? How job anxiety affects top executive decision making in gain and loss contexts. / Mannor, Michael J.; Wowak, Adam J.; Bartkus, Viva Ona; Gomez-Mejia, Luis.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 1968-1989.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mannor, Michael J. ; Wowak, Adam J. ; Bartkus, Viva Ona ; Gomez-Mejia, Luis. / Heavy lies the crown? How job anxiety affects top executive decision making in gain and loss contexts. In: Strategic Management Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 37, No. 9. pp. 1968-1989.
@article{75ea8200921645bc9889604036229b0c,
title = "Heavy lies the crown? How job anxiety affects top executive decision making in gain and loss contexts",
abstract = "Research summary: Despite abundant anecdotal evidence that many top executives experience anxiety in their jobs, the upper echelons literature has remained largely silent on the organizational implications of executive job anxiety. In this study, we theorize that job anxiety will cause executives to (1) create a social buffer against threats by surrounding themselves with supportive decision-making teams, and (2) pursue lower-risk firm strategies. We further argue that these effects will vary depending upon whether strategic decisions occur in gain versus loss contexts. We test our ideas using a novel multisource, multimethod approach that includes data from 84 top executives of large organizations, their decision-making teams, their friends and families, and archival sources. Results from an analysis of 154 major strategic decisions provide general support for our theory. Managerial summary: Although many top executives experience anxiety in their jobs, some struggle more with anxiety than others. Our paper is the first to focus on how job anxiety affects executives' decisions. We analyze 154 major strategic decisions made by 84 top executives of large organizations in a range of industries, collecting data from personal interviews with executives and surveys of their decision-making teams, spouses, and friends. We find that anxious executives take fewer strategic risks, especially when things are going well. We further argue that anxious executives focus more on “buffering” themselves from threats, and find that they surround themselves with close supporters when times are tough. Our results demonstrate a pattern through which anxiety causes top executives to focus more heavily on avoiding potential threats.",
keywords = "behavioral decision theory, CEOs, job anxiety, strategic decision making, upper echelons",
author = "Mannor, {Michael J.} and Wowak, {Adam J.} and Bartkus, {Viva Ona} and Luis Gomez-Mejia",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2425",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1968--1989",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heavy lies the crown? How job anxiety affects top executive decision making in gain and loss contexts

AU - Mannor, Michael J.

AU - Wowak, Adam J.

AU - Bartkus, Viva Ona

AU - Gomez-Mejia, Luis

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Research summary: Despite abundant anecdotal evidence that many top executives experience anxiety in their jobs, the upper echelons literature has remained largely silent on the organizational implications of executive job anxiety. In this study, we theorize that job anxiety will cause executives to (1) create a social buffer against threats by surrounding themselves with supportive decision-making teams, and (2) pursue lower-risk firm strategies. We further argue that these effects will vary depending upon whether strategic decisions occur in gain versus loss contexts. We test our ideas using a novel multisource, multimethod approach that includes data from 84 top executives of large organizations, their decision-making teams, their friends and families, and archival sources. Results from an analysis of 154 major strategic decisions provide general support for our theory. Managerial summary: Although many top executives experience anxiety in their jobs, some struggle more with anxiety than others. Our paper is the first to focus on how job anxiety affects executives' decisions. We analyze 154 major strategic decisions made by 84 top executives of large organizations in a range of industries, collecting data from personal interviews with executives and surveys of their decision-making teams, spouses, and friends. We find that anxious executives take fewer strategic risks, especially when things are going well. We further argue that anxious executives focus more on “buffering” themselves from threats, and find that they surround themselves with close supporters when times are tough. Our results demonstrate a pattern through which anxiety causes top executives to focus more heavily on avoiding potential threats.

AB - Research summary: Despite abundant anecdotal evidence that many top executives experience anxiety in their jobs, the upper echelons literature has remained largely silent on the organizational implications of executive job anxiety. In this study, we theorize that job anxiety will cause executives to (1) create a social buffer against threats by surrounding themselves with supportive decision-making teams, and (2) pursue lower-risk firm strategies. We further argue that these effects will vary depending upon whether strategic decisions occur in gain versus loss contexts. We test our ideas using a novel multisource, multimethod approach that includes data from 84 top executives of large organizations, their decision-making teams, their friends and families, and archival sources. Results from an analysis of 154 major strategic decisions provide general support for our theory. Managerial summary: Although many top executives experience anxiety in their jobs, some struggle more with anxiety than others. Our paper is the first to focus on how job anxiety affects executives' decisions. We analyze 154 major strategic decisions made by 84 top executives of large organizations in a range of industries, collecting data from personal interviews with executives and surveys of their decision-making teams, spouses, and friends. We find that anxious executives take fewer strategic risks, especially when things are going well. We further argue that anxious executives focus more on “buffering” themselves from threats, and find that they surround themselves with close supporters when times are tough. Our results demonstrate a pattern through which anxiety causes top executives to focus more heavily on avoiding potential threats.

KW - behavioral decision theory

KW - CEOs

KW - job anxiety

KW - strategic decision making

KW - upper echelons

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941687260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941687260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2425

DO - 10.1002/smj.2425

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 1968

EP - 1989

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 9

ER -