HCLS 2.0/3.0: Health care and life sciences data mashup using Web 2.0/3.0

Kei Hoi Cheung, Kevin Y. Yip, Jeffrey P. Townsend, Matthew Scotch

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

We describe the potential of current Web 2.0 technologies to achieve data mashup in the health care and life sciences (HCLS) domains, and compare that potential to the nascent trend of performing semantic mashup. After providing an overview of Web 2.0, we demonstrate two scenarios of data mashup, facilitated by the following Web 2.0 tools and sites: Yahoo! Pipes, Dapper, Google Maps and GeoCommons. In the first scenario, we exploited Dapper and Yahoo! Pipes to implement a challenging data integration task in the context of DNA microarray research. In the second scenario, we exploited Yahoo! Pipes, Google Maps, and GeoCommons to create a geographic information system (GIS) interface that allows visualization and integration of diverse categories of public health data, including cancer incidence and pollution prevalence data. Based on these two scenarios, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these Web 2.0 mashup technologies. We then describe Semantic Web, the mainstream Web 3.0 technology that enables more powerful data integration over the Web. We discuss the areas of intersection of Web 2.0 and Semantic Web, and describe the potential benefits that can be brought to HCLS research by combining these two sets of technologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)694-705
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Biomedical Informatics
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bioinformatics
  • Biomedical informatics
  • Health care
  • Integration
  • Life sciences
  • Mashup
  • Public health
  • Semantic Web
  • Web 2.0

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Informatics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HCLS 2.0/3.0: Health care and life sciences data mashup using Web 2.0/3.0'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this