Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence

John E. Eck, Edward Maguire

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The police do not prevent crime. This is one of the best kept secrets of modern life. Experts know it, the police know it, but the public does not know it. Yet the police pretend that they are society's best defense against crime and continually argue that if they are given more resources, especially personnel, they will be able to protect communities against crime. This is a myth. David Bayley, Police for the Future. The connection of policing to risk factors is the most powerful conclusion reached from three decades of research. Hiring more police to provide rapid 911 response, unfocused random patrol, and reactive arrests does not prevent serious crime. Community policing without a clear focus on crime risk factors generally shows no effect on crime. But direct patrols, proactive arrests, and problem-solving at high-crime “hot spots” has shown substantial evidence of crime prevention. Police can prevent robbery, disorder, gun violence, drunk driving and domestic violence, but only by using certain methods under certain conditions. Lawrence Sherman, “Policing for Crime Prevention” these statements summarize two popular perspectives held by social scientists on the effect of police on crime. Some believe that the police do not and probably cannot have a significant effect on crime rates (Gottfredson and Hirschi 1990; Klockars 1983; Moran 1995). This viewpoint was forged from a sociological tradition in which theories provide no role for police in their explanations of crime.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Crime Drop in America, Revised Edition
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages207-265
Number of pages59
ISBN (Electronic)9780511616167
ISBN (Print)0521681480, 9780521862790
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

violent crime
police
offense
evidence
crime prevention
crime rate
hiring
social scientist
domestic violence
community
myth
personnel
expert
violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Eck, J. E., & Maguire, E. (2005). Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. In The Crime Drop in America, Revised Edition (pp. 207-265). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616167.008

Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. / Eck, John E.; Maguire, Edward.

The Crime Drop in America, Revised Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2005. p. 207-265.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Eck, JE & Maguire, E 2005, Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. in The Crime Drop in America, Revised Edition. Cambridge University Press, pp. 207-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616167.008
Eck JE, Maguire E. Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. In The Crime Drop in America, Revised Edition. Cambridge University Press. 2005. p. 207-265 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616167.008
Eck, John E. ; Maguire, Edward. / Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. The Crime Drop in America, Revised Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2005. pp. 207-265
@inbook{cd08cf582b714c49918b6d8439420349,
title = "Have changes in policing reduced violent crime?: An assessment of the evidence",
abstract = "The police do not prevent crime. This is one of the best kept secrets of modern life. Experts know it, the police know it, but the public does not know it. Yet the police pretend that they are society's best defense against crime and continually argue that if they are given more resources, especially personnel, they will be able to protect communities against crime. This is a myth. David Bayley, Police for the Future. The connection of policing to risk factors is the most powerful conclusion reached from three decades of research. Hiring more police to provide rapid 911 response, unfocused random patrol, and reactive arrests does not prevent serious crime. Community policing without a clear focus on crime risk factors generally shows no effect on crime. But direct patrols, proactive arrests, and problem-solving at high-crime “hot spots” has shown substantial evidence of crime prevention. Police can prevent robbery, disorder, gun violence, drunk driving and domestic violence, but only by using certain methods under certain conditions. Lawrence Sherman, “Policing for Crime Prevention” these statements summarize two popular perspectives held by social scientists on the effect of police on crime. Some believe that the police do not and probably cannot have a significant effect on crime rates (Gottfredson and Hirschi 1990; Klockars 1983; Moran 1995). This viewpoint was forged from a sociological tradition in which theories provide no role for police in their explanations of crime.",
author = "Eck, {John E.} and Edward Maguire",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511616167.008",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0521681480",
pages = "207--265",
booktitle = "The Crime Drop in America, Revised Edition",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Have changes in policing reduced violent crime?

T2 - An assessment of the evidence

AU - Eck, John E.

AU - Maguire, Edward

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - The police do not prevent crime. This is one of the best kept secrets of modern life. Experts know it, the police know it, but the public does not know it. Yet the police pretend that they are society's best defense against crime and continually argue that if they are given more resources, especially personnel, they will be able to protect communities against crime. This is a myth. David Bayley, Police for the Future. The connection of policing to risk factors is the most powerful conclusion reached from three decades of research. Hiring more police to provide rapid 911 response, unfocused random patrol, and reactive arrests does not prevent serious crime. Community policing without a clear focus on crime risk factors generally shows no effect on crime. But direct patrols, proactive arrests, and problem-solving at high-crime “hot spots” has shown substantial evidence of crime prevention. Police can prevent robbery, disorder, gun violence, drunk driving and domestic violence, but only by using certain methods under certain conditions. Lawrence Sherman, “Policing for Crime Prevention” these statements summarize two popular perspectives held by social scientists on the effect of police on crime. Some believe that the police do not and probably cannot have a significant effect on crime rates (Gottfredson and Hirschi 1990; Klockars 1983; Moran 1995). This viewpoint was forged from a sociological tradition in which theories provide no role for police in their explanations of crime.

AB - The police do not prevent crime. This is one of the best kept secrets of modern life. Experts know it, the police know it, but the public does not know it. Yet the police pretend that they are society's best defense against crime and continually argue that if they are given more resources, especially personnel, they will be able to protect communities against crime. This is a myth. David Bayley, Police for the Future. The connection of policing to risk factors is the most powerful conclusion reached from three decades of research. Hiring more police to provide rapid 911 response, unfocused random patrol, and reactive arrests does not prevent serious crime. Community policing without a clear focus on crime risk factors generally shows no effect on crime. But direct patrols, proactive arrests, and problem-solving at high-crime “hot spots” has shown substantial evidence of crime prevention. Police can prevent robbery, disorder, gun violence, drunk driving and domestic violence, but only by using certain methods under certain conditions. Lawrence Sherman, “Policing for Crime Prevention” these statements summarize two popular perspectives held by social scientists on the effect of police on crime. Some believe that the police do not and probably cannot have a significant effect on crime rates (Gottfredson and Hirschi 1990; Klockars 1983; Moran 1995). This viewpoint was forged from a sociological tradition in which theories provide no role for police in their explanations of crime.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926974524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926974524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511616167.008

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511616167.008

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84926974524

SN - 0521681480

SN - 9780521862790

SP - 207

EP - 265

BT - The Crime Drop in America, Revised Edition

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -