H5N1 and the Politics Of Truth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The social fact of disease means the ethical dimensions of H5N1 research are not only fraught but empirical. Any account of the reality of research that leaves out its ethical dimensions leaves out reality. For this reason alone-and quite apart from his carefully reasoned analysis-David Resnik deserves our thanks: his attention in this issue to the ethics of knowledge focuses our attention on the fact that the possible harms and benefits of H5N1 turn as much on the "politics of truth"-how work is conducted and talked about-as the biology itself. Sufficient discussion of this ethical dimension, as Resnik points out, requires attending to all stages of research, its premises and its ramifications. Resnik focuses on questions of publication and risk, offering philosophical, legal, and political insight. For my part, I would like to bolster (if complicate) Resnik's assessment by offering a few anthropological notes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-37
Number of pages3
JournalHastings Center Report
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Politics
politics
Research
Anthropology
Ethics
Publications
biology
moral philosophy
Disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy
  • Philosophy

Cite this

H5N1 and the Politics Of Truth. / Bennett, Gaymon.

In: Hastings Center Report, Vol. 43, No. 2, 03.2013, p. 35-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bennett, Gaymon. / H5N1 and the Politics Of Truth. In: Hastings Center Report. 2013 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 35-37.
@article{c876b6a5c742413c9559eb4cd8a36910,
title = "H5N1 and the Politics Of Truth",
abstract = "The social fact of disease means the ethical dimensions of H5N1 research are not only fraught but empirical. Any account of the reality of research that leaves out its ethical dimensions leaves out reality. For this reason alone-and quite apart from his carefully reasoned analysis-David Resnik deserves our thanks: his attention in this issue to the ethics of knowledge focuses our attention on the fact that the possible harms and benefits of H5N1 turn as much on the {"}politics of truth{"}-how work is conducted and talked about-as the biology itself. Sufficient discussion of this ethical dimension, as Resnik points out, requires attending to all stages of research, its premises and its ramifications. Resnik focuses on questions of publication and risk, offering philosophical, legal, and political insight. For my part, I would like to bolster (if complicate) Resnik's assessment by offering a few anthropological notes.",
author = "Gaymon Bennett",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/hast.157",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "35--37",
journal = "Hastings Center Report",
issn = "0093-0334",
publisher = "Hastings Center",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - H5N1 and the Politics Of Truth

AU - Bennett, Gaymon

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The social fact of disease means the ethical dimensions of H5N1 research are not only fraught but empirical. Any account of the reality of research that leaves out its ethical dimensions leaves out reality. For this reason alone-and quite apart from his carefully reasoned analysis-David Resnik deserves our thanks: his attention in this issue to the ethics of knowledge focuses our attention on the fact that the possible harms and benefits of H5N1 turn as much on the "politics of truth"-how work is conducted and talked about-as the biology itself. Sufficient discussion of this ethical dimension, as Resnik points out, requires attending to all stages of research, its premises and its ramifications. Resnik focuses on questions of publication and risk, offering philosophical, legal, and political insight. For my part, I would like to bolster (if complicate) Resnik's assessment by offering a few anthropological notes.

AB - The social fact of disease means the ethical dimensions of H5N1 research are not only fraught but empirical. Any account of the reality of research that leaves out its ethical dimensions leaves out reality. For this reason alone-and quite apart from his carefully reasoned analysis-David Resnik deserves our thanks: his attention in this issue to the ethics of knowledge focuses our attention on the fact that the possible harms and benefits of H5N1 turn as much on the "politics of truth"-how work is conducted and talked about-as the biology itself. Sufficient discussion of this ethical dimension, as Resnik points out, requires attending to all stages of research, its premises and its ramifications. Resnik focuses on questions of publication and risk, offering philosophical, legal, and political insight. For my part, I would like to bolster (if complicate) Resnik's assessment by offering a few anthropological notes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875034612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875034612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hast.157

DO - 10.1002/hast.157

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 35

EP - 37

JO - Hastings Center Report

JF - Hastings Center Report

SN - 0093-0334

IS - 2

ER -