Guidelines for organizing a fisheries learning exchange

Katie R. Thompson, Amy Hudson Weaver, Lekelia Jenkins, Nathalie Zenny, Nicolas J. Pilcher, S. Hoyt Peckham, William D. Heyman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This short communication piece presents guidelines and challenges for organizing fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs). Non-governmental organizations, government agencies, and resource users use FLEs to share best practices and bridge knowledge gaps between small-scale fishing communities and stakeholder groups. Even though FLEs are widely used and have numerous cited benefits, there are challenges associated with planning and implementing FLEs. To overcome these challenges and maximize FLEs’ effectiveness, the authors describe guidelines for FLE organizers. The guidelines are based on the perspectives of over 20 FLE experts collected during 2013 through questionnaires, interviews, discussions, and surveys. The guidelines include steps that organizers should take before, during, and after a FLE. For instance, there was broad consensus that before a FLE, it is important to select a diverse group of participants, including both conservation advocates and critics, and to create an exchange agreement outlining the roles and responsibilities of participants. During a FLE, cultural activities and daily reflections by participants are valuable to the exchange process. After a FLE, activities that formalize the participants’ involvement in the FLE are important, such as welcome-home ceremonies and participation certificates. Follow-up support for FLE participants is perceived as an essential step in the FLE and should be included in the FLE's budget. Finally, challenges in organizing FLEs are explicitly described and potential solutions to overcome those challenges are provided. The authors researched and compiled these guidelines and challenges to inform and improve the increasingly widespread use of FLEs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)214-218
Number of pages5
JournalMarine Policy
Volume77
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

fishery
learning
fisheries
Organizing
Fisheries
fishing community
nongovernmental organizations
government agencies
cultural relations
knowledge gap
communication (human)
government agency
nongovernmental organization
stakeholders
best practice
certification
critic
interviews
stakeholder
budget

Keywords

  • Fisheries learning exchange
  • Fisheries management
  • Knowledge exchange
  • Marine conservation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law

Cite this

Thompson, K. R., Weaver, A. H., Jenkins, L., Zenny, N., Pilcher, N. J., Peckham, S. H., & Heyman, W. D. (2017). Guidelines for organizing a fisheries learning exchange. Marine Policy, 77, 214-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.008

Guidelines for organizing a fisheries learning exchange. / Thompson, Katie R.; Weaver, Amy Hudson; Jenkins, Lekelia; Zenny, Nathalie; Pilcher, Nicolas J.; Peckham, S. Hoyt; Heyman, William D.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 77, 01.03.2017, p. 214-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thompson, KR, Weaver, AH, Jenkins, L, Zenny, N, Pilcher, NJ, Peckham, SH & Heyman, WD 2017, 'Guidelines for organizing a fisheries learning exchange', Marine Policy, vol. 77, pp. 214-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.008
Thompson KR, Weaver AH, Jenkins L, Zenny N, Pilcher NJ, Peckham SH et al. Guidelines for organizing a fisheries learning exchange. Marine Policy. 2017 Mar 1;77:214-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.008
Thompson, Katie R. ; Weaver, Amy Hudson ; Jenkins, Lekelia ; Zenny, Nathalie ; Pilcher, Nicolas J. ; Peckham, S. Hoyt ; Heyman, William D. / Guidelines for organizing a fisheries learning exchange. In: Marine Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 77. pp. 214-218.
@article{d879a9440453497b9546c8068706688f,
title = "Guidelines for organizing a fisheries learning exchange",
abstract = "This short communication piece presents guidelines and challenges for organizing fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs). Non-governmental organizations, government agencies, and resource users use FLEs to share best practices and bridge knowledge gaps between small-scale fishing communities and stakeholder groups. Even though FLEs are widely used and have numerous cited benefits, there are challenges associated with planning and implementing FLEs. To overcome these challenges and maximize FLEs’ effectiveness, the authors describe guidelines for FLE organizers. The guidelines are based on the perspectives of over 20 FLE experts collected during 2013 through questionnaires, interviews, discussions, and surveys. The guidelines include steps that organizers should take before, during, and after a FLE. For instance, there was broad consensus that before a FLE, it is important to select a diverse group of participants, including both conservation advocates and critics, and to create an exchange agreement outlining the roles and responsibilities of participants. During a FLE, cultural activities and daily reflections by participants are valuable to the exchange process. After a FLE, activities that formalize the participants’ involvement in the FLE are important, such as welcome-home ceremonies and participation certificates. Follow-up support for FLE participants is perceived as an essential step in the FLE and should be included in the FLE's budget. Finally, challenges in organizing FLEs are explicitly described and potential solutions to overcome those challenges are provided. The authors researched and compiled these guidelines and challenges to inform and improve the increasingly widespread use of FLEs.",
keywords = "Fisheries learning exchange, Fisheries management, Knowledge exchange, Marine conservation",
author = "Thompson, {Katie R.} and Weaver, {Amy Hudson} and Lekelia Jenkins and Nathalie Zenny and Pilcher, {Nicolas J.} and Peckham, {S. Hoyt} and Heyman, {William D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "214--218",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines for organizing a fisheries learning exchange

AU - Thompson, Katie R.

AU - Weaver, Amy Hudson

AU - Jenkins, Lekelia

AU - Zenny, Nathalie

AU - Pilcher, Nicolas J.

AU - Peckham, S. Hoyt

AU - Heyman, William D.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - This short communication piece presents guidelines and challenges for organizing fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs). Non-governmental organizations, government agencies, and resource users use FLEs to share best practices and bridge knowledge gaps between small-scale fishing communities and stakeholder groups. Even though FLEs are widely used and have numerous cited benefits, there are challenges associated with planning and implementing FLEs. To overcome these challenges and maximize FLEs’ effectiveness, the authors describe guidelines for FLE organizers. The guidelines are based on the perspectives of over 20 FLE experts collected during 2013 through questionnaires, interviews, discussions, and surveys. The guidelines include steps that organizers should take before, during, and after a FLE. For instance, there was broad consensus that before a FLE, it is important to select a diverse group of participants, including both conservation advocates and critics, and to create an exchange agreement outlining the roles and responsibilities of participants. During a FLE, cultural activities and daily reflections by participants are valuable to the exchange process. After a FLE, activities that formalize the participants’ involvement in the FLE are important, such as welcome-home ceremonies and participation certificates. Follow-up support for FLE participants is perceived as an essential step in the FLE and should be included in the FLE's budget. Finally, challenges in organizing FLEs are explicitly described and potential solutions to overcome those challenges are provided. The authors researched and compiled these guidelines and challenges to inform and improve the increasingly widespread use of FLEs.

AB - This short communication piece presents guidelines and challenges for organizing fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs). Non-governmental organizations, government agencies, and resource users use FLEs to share best practices and bridge knowledge gaps between small-scale fishing communities and stakeholder groups. Even though FLEs are widely used and have numerous cited benefits, there are challenges associated with planning and implementing FLEs. To overcome these challenges and maximize FLEs’ effectiveness, the authors describe guidelines for FLE organizers. The guidelines are based on the perspectives of over 20 FLE experts collected during 2013 through questionnaires, interviews, discussions, and surveys. The guidelines include steps that organizers should take before, during, and after a FLE. For instance, there was broad consensus that before a FLE, it is important to select a diverse group of participants, including both conservation advocates and critics, and to create an exchange agreement outlining the roles and responsibilities of participants. During a FLE, cultural activities and daily reflections by participants are valuable to the exchange process. After a FLE, activities that formalize the participants’ involvement in the FLE are important, such as welcome-home ceremonies and participation certificates. Follow-up support for FLE participants is perceived as an essential step in the FLE and should be included in the FLE's budget. Finally, challenges in organizing FLEs are explicitly described and potential solutions to overcome those challenges are provided. The authors researched and compiled these guidelines and challenges to inform and improve the increasingly widespread use of FLEs.

KW - Fisheries learning exchange

KW - Fisheries management

KW - Knowledge exchange

KW - Marine conservation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008368532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008368532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85008368532

VL - 77

SP - 214

EP - 218

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

ER -