Guided Instruction Improves Elementary Student Learning and Self-Efficacy in Science

Carolyn J. Hushman, Scott Marley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors investigated whether the amount of instructional guidance affects science learning and self-efficacy. Sixty 9-and 10-year-old children were randomly assigned to one of the following three instructional conditions: (a) guided instruction consisting of examples and student-generated explanations, (b) direct instruction consisting of a lecture and examples, and (c) minimal instruction consisting of student directed discovery. Children who received guided instruction designed a greater percentage of experiments correctly and self-reported greater changes in science self-efficacy than children in the other conditions. No statistically significant differences were observed between direct and guided instruction on outcome measures of cued recall, application and evaluation. However, both conditions performed statistically higher on these outcome measures relative to the minimal instruction condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-381
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Educational Research
Volume108
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2015

Fingerprint

self-efficacy
instruction
science
learning
student
experiment
evaluation

Keywords

  • cognitive processes/development
  • elementary school
  • instruction
  • science education
  • self-efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Guided Instruction Improves Elementary Student Learning and Self-Efficacy in Science. / Hushman, Carolyn J.; Marley, Scott.

In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 108, No. 5, 03.09.2015, p. 371-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe879b7f03e044e9b146b7df18fc05d4,
title = "Guided Instruction Improves Elementary Student Learning and Self-Efficacy in Science",
abstract = "The authors investigated whether the amount of instructional guidance affects science learning and self-efficacy. Sixty 9-and 10-year-old children were randomly assigned to one of the following three instructional conditions: (a) guided instruction consisting of examples and student-generated explanations, (b) direct instruction consisting of a lecture and examples, and (c) minimal instruction consisting of student directed discovery. Children who received guided instruction designed a greater percentage of experiments correctly and self-reported greater changes in science self-efficacy than children in the other conditions. No statistically significant differences were observed between direct and guided instruction on outcome measures of cued recall, application and evaluation. However, both conditions performed statistically higher on these outcome measures relative to the minimal instruction condition.",
keywords = "cognitive processes/development, elementary school, instruction, science education, self-efficacy",
author = "Hushman, {Carolyn J.} and Scott Marley",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00220671.2014.899958",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "371--381",
journal = "Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0022-0671",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guided Instruction Improves Elementary Student Learning and Self-Efficacy in Science

AU - Hushman, Carolyn J.

AU - Marley, Scott

PY - 2015/9/3

Y1 - 2015/9/3

N2 - The authors investigated whether the amount of instructional guidance affects science learning and self-efficacy. Sixty 9-and 10-year-old children were randomly assigned to one of the following three instructional conditions: (a) guided instruction consisting of examples and student-generated explanations, (b) direct instruction consisting of a lecture and examples, and (c) minimal instruction consisting of student directed discovery. Children who received guided instruction designed a greater percentage of experiments correctly and self-reported greater changes in science self-efficacy than children in the other conditions. No statistically significant differences were observed between direct and guided instruction on outcome measures of cued recall, application and evaluation. However, both conditions performed statistically higher on these outcome measures relative to the minimal instruction condition.

AB - The authors investigated whether the amount of instructional guidance affects science learning and self-efficacy. Sixty 9-and 10-year-old children were randomly assigned to one of the following three instructional conditions: (a) guided instruction consisting of examples and student-generated explanations, (b) direct instruction consisting of a lecture and examples, and (c) minimal instruction consisting of student directed discovery. Children who received guided instruction designed a greater percentage of experiments correctly and self-reported greater changes in science self-efficacy than children in the other conditions. No statistically significant differences were observed between direct and guided instruction on outcome measures of cued recall, application and evaluation. However, both conditions performed statistically higher on these outcome measures relative to the minimal instruction condition.

KW - cognitive processes/development

KW - elementary school

KW - instruction

KW - science education

KW - self-efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939469126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939469126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00220671.2014.899958

DO - 10.1080/00220671.2014.899958

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939469126

VL - 108

SP - 371

EP - 381

JO - Journal of Educational Research

JF - Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0022-0671

IS - 5

ER -