Guided inquiry learning across educational contexts

Elliot P. Douglas, M. David Miller, Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, Timothy Wells, Timothy Raymond, Cindy Waters, William L. Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Student-centered learning is known to lead to greater student knowledge gains and conceptual understanding. In practice, implementation of these approaches can vary from the ideal implementation as defined by the original developer, leading to differences in student outcomes compared to what might be expected. Fidelity of implementation, i.e., the extent to which key practices of a pedagogical approach are used, must be considered in understanding how student-centered pedagogies impact students. In this mixed method study, we examined how Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) was implemented across diverse institutional contexts and how those implementations affected students' conceptual understanding. The domains of curricula framework allowed us to understand how the curriculum as practiced by instructors and experienced by students differed from the ideal curriculum as originally designed. Our results show that implementation is impacted by the particular circumstances of a classroom, and that differences in implementation can affect the benefits to students.Weconclude that fidelity of implementation needs to be taken into account when considering the effectiveness of any pedagogy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-186
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Engineering Education
Volume34
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Students
learning
student
Curricula
curriculum
instructor
classroom

Keywords

  • Active learning
  • Fidelity of implementation
  • Guided inquiry
  • POGIL
  • Student-centered learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Douglas, E. P., Miller, M. D., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Wells, T., Raymond, T., Waters, C., & Hughes, W. L. (2018). Guided inquiry learning across educational contexts. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 171-186.

Guided inquiry learning across educational contexts. / Douglas, Elliot P.; Miller, M. David; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; Wells, Timothy; Raymond, Timothy; Waters, Cindy; Hughes, William L.

In: International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 171-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Douglas, EP, Miller, MD, Koro-Ljungberg, M, Wells, T, Raymond, T, Waters, C & Hughes, WL 2018, 'Guided inquiry learning across educational contexts', International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 171-186.
Douglas EP, Miller MD, Koro-Ljungberg M, Wells T, Raymond T, Waters C et al. Guided inquiry learning across educational contexts. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2018 Jan 1;34(1):171-186.
Douglas, Elliot P. ; Miller, M. David ; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka ; Wells, Timothy ; Raymond, Timothy ; Waters, Cindy ; Hughes, William L. / Guided inquiry learning across educational contexts. In: International Journal of Engineering Education. 2018 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 171-186.
@article{c1b257c47d62470dbda74069ff26a8f7,
title = "Guided inquiry learning across educational contexts",
abstract = "Student-centered learning is known to lead to greater student knowledge gains and conceptual understanding. In practice, implementation of these approaches can vary from the ideal implementation as defined by the original developer, leading to differences in student outcomes compared to what might be expected. Fidelity of implementation, i.e., the extent to which key practices of a pedagogical approach are used, must be considered in understanding how student-centered pedagogies impact students. In this mixed method study, we examined how Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) was implemented across diverse institutional contexts and how those implementations affected students' conceptual understanding. The domains of curricula framework allowed us to understand how the curriculum as practiced by instructors and experienced by students differed from the ideal curriculum as originally designed. Our results show that implementation is impacted by the particular circumstances of a classroom, and that differences in implementation can affect the benefits to students.Weconclude that fidelity of implementation needs to be taken into account when considering the effectiveness of any pedagogy.",
keywords = "Active learning, Fidelity of implementation, Guided inquiry, POGIL, Student-centered learning",
author = "Douglas, {Elliot P.} and Miller, {M. David} and Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and Timothy Wells and Timothy Raymond and Cindy Waters and Hughes, {William L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "171--186",
journal = "International Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "0949-149X",
publisher = "Tempus Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guided inquiry learning across educational contexts

AU - Douglas, Elliot P.

AU - Miller, M. David

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

AU - Wells, Timothy

AU - Raymond, Timothy

AU - Waters, Cindy

AU - Hughes, William L.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Student-centered learning is known to lead to greater student knowledge gains and conceptual understanding. In practice, implementation of these approaches can vary from the ideal implementation as defined by the original developer, leading to differences in student outcomes compared to what might be expected. Fidelity of implementation, i.e., the extent to which key practices of a pedagogical approach are used, must be considered in understanding how student-centered pedagogies impact students. In this mixed method study, we examined how Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) was implemented across diverse institutional contexts and how those implementations affected students' conceptual understanding. The domains of curricula framework allowed us to understand how the curriculum as practiced by instructors and experienced by students differed from the ideal curriculum as originally designed. Our results show that implementation is impacted by the particular circumstances of a classroom, and that differences in implementation can affect the benefits to students.Weconclude that fidelity of implementation needs to be taken into account when considering the effectiveness of any pedagogy.

AB - Student-centered learning is known to lead to greater student knowledge gains and conceptual understanding. In practice, implementation of these approaches can vary from the ideal implementation as defined by the original developer, leading to differences in student outcomes compared to what might be expected. Fidelity of implementation, i.e., the extent to which key practices of a pedagogical approach are used, must be considered in understanding how student-centered pedagogies impact students. In this mixed method study, we examined how Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) was implemented across diverse institutional contexts and how those implementations affected students' conceptual understanding. The domains of curricula framework allowed us to understand how the curriculum as practiced by instructors and experienced by students differed from the ideal curriculum as originally designed. Our results show that implementation is impacted by the particular circumstances of a classroom, and that differences in implementation can affect the benefits to students.Weconclude that fidelity of implementation needs to be taken into account when considering the effectiveness of any pedagogy.

KW - Active learning

KW - Fidelity of implementation

KW - Guided inquiry

KW - POGIL

KW - Student-centered learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042524345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042524345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 171

EP - 186

JO - International Journal of Engineering Education

JF - International Journal of Engineering Education

SN - 0949-149X

IS - 1

ER -