Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins

Christopher Dean, Meave G. Leakey, Donald Reid, Friedemann Schrenk, Gary Schwartz, Christopher Stringer, Alan Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

347 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A modern human-like sequence of dental development, as a proxy for the pace of life history, is regarded as one of the diagnostic hallmarks of our own genus Homo1-3. Brain size, age at first reproduction, lifespan and other life-history traits correlate tightly with dental development4-6. Here we report differences in enamel growth that show the earliest fossils attributed to Homo do not resemble modern humans in their development. We used daily incremental markings in enamel to calculate rates of enamel formation in 13 fossil hominins and identified differences in this key determinant of tooth formation time. Neither australopiths nor fossils currently attributed to early Homo shared the slow trajectory of enamel growth typical of modern humans; rather, both resembled modern and fossil African apes. We then reconstructed tooth formation times in australopiths, in the ∼1.5-Myrold Homo erectus skeleton from Nariokotome, Kenya7, and in another Homo erectus specimen, Sangiran S7-37 from Java8. These times were shorter than those in modern humans. It therefore seems likely that truly modern dental development emerged relatively late in human evolution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)628-631
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume414
Issue number6864
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 6 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hominidae
Tooth
Fossils
Dental Enamel
Growth
ethyl-2-methylthio-4-methyl-5-pyrimidine carboxylate
Proxy
Skeleton
Reproduction
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Dean, C., Leakey, M. G., Reid, D., Schrenk, F., Schwartz, G., Stringer, C., & Walker, A. (2001). Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. Nature, 414(6864), 628-631. https://doi.org/10.1038/414628a

Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. / Dean, Christopher; Leakey, Meave G.; Reid, Donald; Schrenk, Friedemann; Schwartz, Gary; Stringer, Christopher; Walker, Alan.

In: Nature, Vol. 414, No. 6864, 06.12.2001, p. 628-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dean, C, Leakey, MG, Reid, D, Schrenk, F, Schwartz, G, Stringer, C & Walker, A 2001, 'Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins', Nature, vol. 414, no. 6864, pp. 628-631. https://doi.org/10.1038/414628a
Dean, Christopher ; Leakey, Meave G. ; Reid, Donald ; Schrenk, Friedemann ; Schwartz, Gary ; Stringer, Christopher ; Walker, Alan. / Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. In: Nature. 2001 ; Vol. 414, No. 6864. pp. 628-631.
@article{1effaedc836c4ebcb554ca15d0111a80,
title = "Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins",
abstract = "A modern human-like sequence of dental development, as a proxy for the pace of life history, is regarded as one of the diagnostic hallmarks of our own genus Homo1-3. Brain size, age at first reproduction, lifespan and other life-history traits correlate tightly with dental development4-6. Here we report differences in enamel growth that show the earliest fossils attributed to Homo do not resemble modern humans in their development. We used daily incremental markings in enamel to calculate rates of enamel formation in 13 fossil hominins and identified differences in this key determinant of tooth formation time. Neither australopiths nor fossils currently attributed to early Homo shared the slow trajectory of enamel growth typical of modern humans; rather, both resembled modern and fossil African apes. We then reconstructed tooth formation times in australopiths, in the ∼1.5-Myrold Homo erectus skeleton from Nariokotome, Kenya7, and in another Homo erectus specimen, Sangiran S7-37 from Java8. These times were shorter than those in modern humans. It therefore seems likely that truly modern dental development emerged relatively late in human evolution.",
author = "Christopher Dean and Leakey, {Meave G.} and Donald Reid and Friedemann Schrenk and Gary Schwartz and Christopher Stringer and Alan Walker",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1038/414628a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "414",
pages = "628--631",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6864",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins

AU - Dean, Christopher

AU - Leakey, Meave G.

AU - Reid, Donald

AU - Schrenk, Friedemann

AU - Schwartz, Gary

AU - Stringer, Christopher

AU - Walker, Alan

PY - 2001/12/6

Y1 - 2001/12/6

N2 - A modern human-like sequence of dental development, as a proxy for the pace of life history, is regarded as one of the diagnostic hallmarks of our own genus Homo1-3. Brain size, age at first reproduction, lifespan and other life-history traits correlate tightly with dental development4-6. Here we report differences in enamel growth that show the earliest fossils attributed to Homo do not resemble modern humans in their development. We used daily incremental markings in enamel to calculate rates of enamel formation in 13 fossil hominins and identified differences in this key determinant of tooth formation time. Neither australopiths nor fossils currently attributed to early Homo shared the slow trajectory of enamel growth typical of modern humans; rather, both resembled modern and fossil African apes. We then reconstructed tooth formation times in australopiths, in the ∼1.5-Myrold Homo erectus skeleton from Nariokotome, Kenya7, and in another Homo erectus specimen, Sangiran S7-37 from Java8. These times were shorter than those in modern humans. It therefore seems likely that truly modern dental development emerged relatively late in human evolution.

AB - A modern human-like sequence of dental development, as a proxy for the pace of life history, is regarded as one of the diagnostic hallmarks of our own genus Homo1-3. Brain size, age at first reproduction, lifespan and other life-history traits correlate tightly with dental development4-6. Here we report differences in enamel growth that show the earliest fossils attributed to Homo do not resemble modern humans in their development. We used daily incremental markings in enamel to calculate rates of enamel formation in 13 fossil hominins and identified differences in this key determinant of tooth formation time. Neither australopiths nor fossils currently attributed to early Homo shared the slow trajectory of enamel growth typical of modern humans; rather, both resembled modern and fossil African apes. We then reconstructed tooth formation times in australopiths, in the ∼1.5-Myrold Homo erectus skeleton from Nariokotome, Kenya7, and in another Homo erectus specimen, Sangiran S7-37 from Java8. These times were shorter than those in modern humans. It therefore seems likely that truly modern dental development emerged relatively late in human evolution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035818987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035818987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/414628a

DO - 10.1038/414628a

M3 - Article

C2 - 11740557

AN - SCOPUS:0035818987

VL - 414

SP - 628

EP - 631

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 6864

ER -