Growth and characterization of CdTe/Si heterostructures - effect of substrate orientation

David Smith, S. C Y Tsen, D. Chandrasekhar, Peter Crozier, S. Rujirawat, G. Brill, Y. P. Chen, R. Sporken, S. Sivananthan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy and small-probe microanalysis have been used to compare the microstructure and compositional profiles of CdTe/Si heterostructures grown by molecular beam epitaxy on (001), (211) and (111) silicon substrates. Overall, our results have demonstrated that the final CdTe growth orientation is determined by careful preparation of the Si substrate surface, the nature of the interfacial layer, and the initial phase nucleation. Initial studies confirmed that growth on (001) was problematical, not only because of the large lattice mismatch between materials (approximately 19%), but also because the double-domain reconstruction of the Si substrate surface degraded epilayer quality. Growth of high quality, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved by offcutting the substrate with respect to the [110] surface direction, with an additional rotation about [110]. Alternatively, with intermediary buffer layers of Ge(001), perfect a/2〈110〉 Lomer edge dislocations accommodated the misfit at the CdTe/Ge interface, and the (001) orientation of the Si substrate was retained during CdTe growth. For (211)-oriented substrates a very thin (approximately 2 nm) buffer layer of ZnTe prior to CdTe deposition was sufficient to maintain the substrate orientation, although Zn diffusion was often observed during subsequent annealing. The growth of Cd1-xZnx Te(211)B (with x approximately 2-4%) with intermediary CdTe buffer layers then provided substrates which were suitably lattice-matched for growth of HgCdTe. Finally, large-area, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved using As-passivated Si(111) substrates and thin (approximately 50 nm) ZnTe buffer layers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-100
Number of pages8
JournalMaterials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology
Volume77
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 7 2000

Fingerprint

Heterojunctions
Substrates
Buffer layers
buffers
Edge dislocations
Lattice mismatch
Epilayers
edge dislocations
Microanalysis
Silicon
microanalysis
Molecular beam epitaxy
Nucleation
molecular beam epitaxy
nucleation
Annealing
Transmission electron microscopy
preparation
transmission electron microscopy
microstructure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Growth and characterization of CdTe/Si heterostructures - effect of substrate orientation. / Smith, David; Tsen, S. C Y; Chandrasekhar, D.; Crozier, Peter; Rujirawat, S.; Brill, G.; Chen, Y. P.; Sporken, R.; Sivananthan, S.

In: Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology, Vol. 77, No. 1, 07.08.2000, p. 93-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, David ; Tsen, S. C Y ; Chandrasekhar, D. ; Crozier, Peter ; Rujirawat, S. ; Brill, G. ; Chen, Y. P. ; Sporken, R. ; Sivananthan, S. / Growth and characterization of CdTe/Si heterostructures - effect of substrate orientation. In: Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology. 2000 ; Vol. 77, No. 1. pp. 93-100.
@article{7ece5bc21cc34f6bb8d5578ce1c159a6,
title = "Growth and characterization of CdTe/Si heterostructures - effect of substrate orientation",
abstract = "Transmission electron microscopy and small-probe microanalysis have been used to compare the microstructure and compositional profiles of CdTe/Si heterostructures grown by molecular beam epitaxy on (001), (211) and (111) silicon substrates. Overall, our results have demonstrated that the final CdTe growth orientation is determined by careful preparation of the Si substrate surface, the nature of the interfacial layer, and the initial phase nucleation. Initial studies confirmed that growth on (001) was problematical, not only because of the large lattice mismatch between materials (approximately 19{\%}), but also because the double-domain reconstruction of the Si substrate surface degraded epilayer quality. Growth of high quality, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved by offcutting the substrate with respect to the [110] surface direction, with an additional rotation about [110]. Alternatively, with intermediary buffer layers of Ge(001), perfect a/2〈110〉 Lomer edge dislocations accommodated the misfit at the CdTe/Ge interface, and the (001) orientation of the Si substrate was retained during CdTe growth. For (211)-oriented substrates a very thin (approximately 2 nm) buffer layer of ZnTe prior to CdTe deposition was sufficient to maintain the substrate orientation, although Zn diffusion was often observed during subsequent annealing. The growth of Cd1-xZnx Te(211)B (with x approximately 2-4{\%}) with intermediary CdTe buffer layers then provided substrates which were suitably lattice-matched for growth of HgCdTe. Finally, large-area, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved using As-passivated Si(111) substrates and thin (approximately 50 nm) ZnTe buffer layers.",
author = "David Smith and Tsen, {S. C Y} and D. Chandrasekhar and Peter Crozier and S. Rujirawat and G. Brill and Chen, {Y. P.} and R. Sporken and S. Sivananthan",
year = "2000",
month = "8",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S0921-5107(00)00480-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "93--100",
journal = "Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology",
issn = "0921-5107",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Growth and characterization of CdTe/Si heterostructures - effect of substrate orientation

AU - Smith, David

AU - Tsen, S. C Y

AU - Chandrasekhar, D.

AU - Crozier, Peter

AU - Rujirawat, S.

AU - Brill, G.

AU - Chen, Y. P.

AU - Sporken, R.

AU - Sivananthan, S.

PY - 2000/8/7

Y1 - 2000/8/7

N2 - Transmission electron microscopy and small-probe microanalysis have been used to compare the microstructure and compositional profiles of CdTe/Si heterostructures grown by molecular beam epitaxy on (001), (211) and (111) silicon substrates. Overall, our results have demonstrated that the final CdTe growth orientation is determined by careful preparation of the Si substrate surface, the nature of the interfacial layer, and the initial phase nucleation. Initial studies confirmed that growth on (001) was problematical, not only because of the large lattice mismatch between materials (approximately 19%), but also because the double-domain reconstruction of the Si substrate surface degraded epilayer quality. Growth of high quality, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved by offcutting the substrate with respect to the [110] surface direction, with an additional rotation about [110]. Alternatively, with intermediary buffer layers of Ge(001), perfect a/2〈110〉 Lomer edge dislocations accommodated the misfit at the CdTe/Ge interface, and the (001) orientation of the Si substrate was retained during CdTe growth. For (211)-oriented substrates a very thin (approximately 2 nm) buffer layer of ZnTe prior to CdTe deposition was sufficient to maintain the substrate orientation, although Zn diffusion was often observed during subsequent annealing. The growth of Cd1-xZnx Te(211)B (with x approximately 2-4%) with intermediary CdTe buffer layers then provided substrates which were suitably lattice-matched for growth of HgCdTe. Finally, large-area, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved using As-passivated Si(111) substrates and thin (approximately 50 nm) ZnTe buffer layers.

AB - Transmission electron microscopy and small-probe microanalysis have been used to compare the microstructure and compositional profiles of CdTe/Si heterostructures grown by molecular beam epitaxy on (001), (211) and (111) silicon substrates. Overall, our results have demonstrated that the final CdTe growth orientation is determined by careful preparation of the Si substrate surface, the nature of the interfacial layer, and the initial phase nucleation. Initial studies confirmed that growth on (001) was problematical, not only because of the large lattice mismatch between materials (approximately 19%), but also because the double-domain reconstruction of the Si substrate surface degraded epilayer quality. Growth of high quality, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved by offcutting the substrate with respect to the [110] surface direction, with an additional rotation about [110]. Alternatively, with intermediary buffer layers of Ge(001), perfect a/2〈110〉 Lomer edge dislocations accommodated the misfit at the CdTe/Ge interface, and the (001) orientation of the Si substrate was retained during CdTe growth. For (211)-oriented substrates a very thin (approximately 2 nm) buffer layer of ZnTe prior to CdTe deposition was sufficient to maintain the substrate orientation, although Zn diffusion was often observed during subsequent annealing. The growth of Cd1-xZnx Te(211)B (with x approximately 2-4%) with intermediary CdTe buffer layers then provided substrates which were suitably lattice-matched for growth of HgCdTe. Finally, large-area, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved using As-passivated Si(111) substrates and thin (approximately 50 nm) ZnTe buffer layers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034249077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034249077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0921-5107(00)00480-3

DO - 10.1016/S0921-5107(00)00480-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034249077

VL - 77

SP - 93

EP - 100

JO - Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology

JF - Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology

SN - 0921-5107

IS - 1

ER -