Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny: Rethinking the polygyny threshold model

Cody T. Ross, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Seung Yun Oh, Samuel Bowles, Bret Beheim, John Bunce, Mark Caudell, Gregory Clark, Heidi Colleran, Carmen Cortez, Patricia Draper, Russell D. Greaves, Michael Gurven, Thomas Headland, Janet Headland, Kim Hill, Barry Hewlett, Hillard S. Kaplan, Jeremy Koster, Karen KramerFrank Marlowe, Richard McElreath, David Nolin, Marsha Quinlan, Robert Quinlan, Caissa Revilla-Minaya, Brooke Scelza, Ryan Schacht, Mary Shenk, Ray Uehara, Eckart Voland, Kai Willfuhr, Bruce Winterhalder, John Ziker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Monogamy appears to have become the predominant human mating system with the emergence of highly unequal agricultural populations that replaced relatively egalitarian horticultural populations, challenging the conventional idea - based on the polygyny threshold model - that polygyny should be positively associated with wealth inequality. To address this polygyny paradox, we generalize the standard polygyny threshold model to a mutual mate choice model predicting the fraction of women married polygynously. We then demonstrate two conditions that are jointly sufficient to make monogamy the predominant marriage form, even in highly unequal societies. We assess if these conditions are satisfied using individual-level data from 29 human populations. Our analysis shows that with the shift to stratified agricultural economies: (i) the population frequency of relatively poor individuals increased, increasing wealth inequality, but decreasing the frequency of individuals with sufficient wealth to secure polygynous marriage, and (ii) diminishing marginal fitness returns to additional wives prevent extremely wealthy men from obtaining as many wives as their relative wealth would otherwise predict. These conditions jointly lead to a high population-level frequency of monogamy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20180035
JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume15
Issue number144
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Marriage
Population
Spouses

Keywords

  • behavioural ecology
  • evolutionary anthropology
  • marriage systems
  • monogamy
  • Polygyny
  • wealth inequality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Biophysics
  • Bioengineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Biochemistry
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Ross, C. T., Mulder, M. B., Oh, S. Y., Bowles, S., Beheim, B., Bunce, J., ... Ziker, J. (2018). Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny: Rethinking the polygyny threshold model. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15(144), [20180035]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0035

Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny : Rethinking the polygyny threshold model. / Ross, Cody T.; Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff; Oh, Seung Yun; Bowles, Samuel; Beheim, Bret; Bunce, John; Caudell, Mark; Clark, Gregory; Colleran, Heidi; Cortez, Carmen; Draper, Patricia; Greaves, Russell D.; Gurven, Michael; Headland, Thomas; Headland, Janet; Hill, Kim; Hewlett, Barry; Kaplan, Hillard S.; Koster, Jeremy; Kramer, Karen; Marlowe, Frank; McElreath, Richard; Nolin, David; Quinlan, Marsha; Quinlan, Robert; Revilla-Minaya, Caissa; Scelza, Brooke; Schacht, Ryan; Shenk, Mary; Uehara, Ray; Voland, Eckart; Willfuhr, Kai; Winterhalder, Bruce; Ziker, John.

In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Vol. 15, No. 144, 20180035, 01.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ross, CT, Mulder, MB, Oh, SY, Bowles, S, Beheim, B, Bunce, J, Caudell, M, Clark, G, Colleran, H, Cortez, C, Draper, P, Greaves, RD, Gurven, M, Headland, T, Headland, J, Hill, K, Hewlett, B, Kaplan, HS, Koster, J, Kramer, K, Marlowe, F, McElreath, R, Nolin, D, Quinlan, M, Quinlan, R, Revilla-Minaya, C, Scelza, B, Schacht, R, Shenk, M, Uehara, R, Voland, E, Willfuhr, K, Winterhalder, B & Ziker, J 2018, 'Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny: Rethinking the polygyny threshold model', Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 15, no. 144, 20180035. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0035
Ross, Cody T. ; Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff ; Oh, Seung Yun ; Bowles, Samuel ; Beheim, Bret ; Bunce, John ; Caudell, Mark ; Clark, Gregory ; Colleran, Heidi ; Cortez, Carmen ; Draper, Patricia ; Greaves, Russell D. ; Gurven, Michael ; Headland, Thomas ; Headland, Janet ; Hill, Kim ; Hewlett, Barry ; Kaplan, Hillard S. ; Koster, Jeremy ; Kramer, Karen ; Marlowe, Frank ; McElreath, Richard ; Nolin, David ; Quinlan, Marsha ; Quinlan, Robert ; Revilla-Minaya, Caissa ; Scelza, Brooke ; Schacht, Ryan ; Shenk, Mary ; Uehara, Ray ; Voland, Eckart ; Willfuhr, Kai ; Winterhalder, Bruce ; Ziker, John. / Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny : Rethinking the polygyny threshold model. In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. 144.
@article{4ce025e58413429f88e8e1252a5d3239,
title = "Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny: Rethinking the polygyny threshold model",
abstract = "Monogamy appears to have become the predominant human mating system with the emergence of highly unequal agricultural populations that replaced relatively egalitarian horticultural populations, challenging the conventional idea - based on the polygyny threshold model - that polygyny should be positively associated with wealth inequality. To address this polygyny paradox, we generalize the standard polygyny threshold model to a mutual mate choice model predicting the fraction of women married polygynously. We then demonstrate two conditions that are jointly sufficient to make monogamy the predominant marriage form, even in highly unequal societies. We assess if these conditions are satisfied using individual-level data from 29 human populations. Our analysis shows that with the shift to stratified agricultural economies: (i) the population frequency of relatively poor individuals increased, increasing wealth inequality, but decreasing the frequency of individuals with sufficient wealth to secure polygynous marriage, and (ii) diminishing marginal fitness returns to additional wives prevent extremely wealthy men from obtaining as many wives as their relative wealth would otherwise predict. These conditions jointly lead to a high population-level frequency of monogamy.",
keywords = "behavioural ecology, evolutionary anthropology, marriage systems, monogamy, Polygyny, wealth inequality",
author = "Ross, {Cody T.} and Mulder, {Monique Borgerhoff} and Oh, {Seung Yun} and Samuel Bowles and Bret Beheim and John Bunce and Mark Caudell and Gregory Clark and Heidi Colleran and Carmen Cortez and Patricia Draper and Greaves, {Russell D.} and Michael Gurven and Thomas Headland and Janet Headland and Kim Hill and Barry Hewlett and Kaplan, {Hillard S.} and Jeremy Koster and Karen Kramer and Frank Marlowe and Richard McElreath and David Nolin and Marsha Quinlan and Robert Quinlan and Caissa Revilla-Minaya and Brooke Scelza and Ryan Schacht and Mary Shenk and Ray Uehara and Eckart Voland and Kai Willfuhr and Bruce Winterhalder and John Ziker",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1098/rsif.2018.0035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Society Interface",
issn = "1742-5689",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "144",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny

T2 - Rethinking the polygyny threshold model

AU - Ross, Cody T.

AU - Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff

AU - Oh, Seung Yun

AU - Bowles, Samuel

AU - Beheim, Bret

AU - Bunce, John

AU - Caudell, Mark

AU - Clark, Gregory

AU - Colleran, Heidi

AU - Cortez, Carmen

AU - Draper, Patricia

AU - Greaves, Russell D.

AU - Gurven, Michael

AU - Headland, Thomas

AU - Headland, Janet

AU - Hill, Kim

AU - Hewlett, Barry

AU - Kaplan, Hillard S.

AU - Koster, Jeremy

AU - Kramer, Karen

AU - Marlowe, Frank

AU - McElreath, Richard

AU - Nolin, David

AU - Quinlan, Marsha

AU - Quinlan, Robert

AU - Revilla-Minaya, Caissa

AU - Scelza, Brooke

AU - Schacht, Ryan

AU - Shenk, Mary

AU - Uehara, Ray

AU - Voland, Eckart

AU - Willfuhr, Kai

AU - Winterhalder, Bruce

AU - Ziker, John

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Monogamy appears to have become the predominant human mating system with the emergence of highly unequal agricultural populations that replaced relatively egalitarian horticultural populations, challenging the conventional idea - based on the polygyny threshold model - that polygyny should be positively associated with wealth inequality. To address this polygyny paradox, we generalize the standard polygyny threshold model to a mutual mate choice model predicting the fraction of women married polygynously. We then demonstrate two conditions that are jointly sufficient to make monogamy the predominant marriage form, even in highly unequal societies. We assess if these conditions are satisfied using individual-level data from 29 human populations. Our analysis shows that with the shift to stratified agricultural economies: (i) the population frequency of relatively poor individuals increased, increasing wealth inequality, but decreasing the frequency of individuals with sufficient wealth to secure polygynous marriage, and (ii) diminishing marginal fitness returns to additional wives prevent extremely wealthy men from obtaining as many wives as their relative wealth would otherwise predict. These conditions jointly lead to a high population-level frequency of monogamy.

AB - Monogamy appears to have become the predominant human mating system with the emergence of highly unequal agricultural populations that replaced relatively egalitarian horticultural populations, challenging the conventional idea - based on the polygyny threshold model - that polygyny should be positively associated with wealth inequality. To address this polygyny paradox, we generalize the standard polygyny threshold model to a mutual mate choice model predicting the fraction of women married polygynously. We then demonstrate two conditions that are jointly sufficient to make monogamy the predominant marriage form, even in highly unequal societies. We assess if these conditions are satisfied using individual-level data from 29 human populations. Our analysis shows that with the shift to stratified agricultural economies: (i) the population frequency of relatively poor individuals increased, increasing wealth inequality, but decreasing the frequency of individuals with sufficient wealth to secure polygynous marriage, and (ii) diminishing marginal fitness returns to additional wives prevent extremely wealthy men from obtaining as many wives as their relative wealth would otherwise predict. These conditions jointly lead to a high population-level frequency of monogamy.

KW - behavioural ecology

KW - evolutionary anthropology

KW - marriage systems

KW - monogamy

KW - Polygyny

KW - wealth inequality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051423672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051423672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2018.0035

DO - 10.1098/rsif.2018.0035

M3 - Article

C2 - 30021924

AN - SCOPUS:85051423672

VL - 15

JO - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

JF - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

SN - 1742-5689

IS - 144

M1 - 20180035

ER -