Gray whales and the value of monitoring data in implementing the U.S. Endangered Species Act

Leah Gerber, Douglas P. DeMaster, Peter M. Kareiva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many scientists lament the absence of data for endangered species and argue that more funds should be spent acquiring basic information about population trends. Using 19 years of abundance estimates for the eastern North Pacific gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus), we sampled subsets of the Original survey data to identify the number of years of data required to remove the population from the U.S. Endangered Species Act's (ESA) list of endangered and threatened wildlife. For any given duration of monitoring, we selected all possible combinations of consecutive counts. To incorporate variability in growth rates, we extracted a maximum likelihood estimator of growth rate and confidence interval about that growth rate on the assumption that the population changes can be approximated by a simple diffusion process with drift. We then applied a new approach to determine ESA status for each subset of survey data and found that a quantitative decision to delist is unambiguously supported by 11 years of data but is precariously uncertain with fewer than 10 years of data. The data needed to produce an unequivocal decision to delist gray whales cost the National Marine Fisheries Service an estimated U.S. $660,000, a surprisingly modest expense given the fact that delisting can greatly simplify regulatory constraints. This example highlights the value of population monitoring in administering the ESA and provides a compelling example of the utility of such information in identifying both imperiled and recovered species. The economic value of such data is that they provide the foundation for delisting, which could ultimately save much more money than the collection of the data would ever cost.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1215-1219
Number of pages5
JournalConservation Biology
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endangered Species Act
whale
endangered species
Monitoring
monitoring
Fisheries
marine fisheries
Maximum likelihood
Costs
economic valuation
confidence interval
wildlife
Economics
duration
monitoring data
Eschrichtius robustus
cost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Gray whales and the value of monitoring data in implementing the U.S. Endangered Species Act. / Gerber, Leah; DeMaster, Douglas P.; Kareiva, Peter M.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 13, No. 5, 10.1999, p. 1215-1219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gerber, Leah ; DeMaster, Douglas P. ; Kareiva, Peter M. / Gray whales and the value of monitoring data in implementing the U.S. Endangered Species Act. In: Conservation Biology. 1999 ; Vol. 13, No. 5. pp. 1215-1219.
@article{740bfe8b68644e71aaa5910509ff644a,
title = "Gray whales and the value of monitoring data in implementing the U.S. Endangered Species Act",
abstract = "Many scientists lament the absence of data for endangered species and argue that more funds should be spent acquiring basic information about population trends. Using 19 years of abundance estimates for the eastern North Pacific gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus), we sampled subsets of the Original survey data to identify the number of years of data required to remove the population from the U.S. Endangered Species Act's (ESA) list of endangered and threatened wildlife. For any given duration of monitoring, we selected all possible combinations of consecutive counts. To incorporate variability in growth rates, we extracted a maximum likelihood estimator of growth rate and confidence interval about that growth rate on the assumption that the population changes can be approximated by a simple diffusion process with drift. We then applied a new approach to determine ESA status for each subset of survey data and found that a quantitative decision to delist is unambiguously supported by 11 years of data but is precariously uncertain with fewer than 10 years of data. The data needed to produce an unequivocal decision to delist gray whales cost the National Marine Fisheries Service an estimated U.S. $660,000, a surprisingly modest expense given the fact that delisting can greatly simplify regulatory constraints. This example highlights the value of population monitoring in administering the ESA and provides a compelling example of the utility of such information in identifying both imperiled and recovered species. The economic value of such data is that they provide the foundation for delisting, which could ultimately save much more money than the collection of the data would ever cost.",
author = "Leah Gerber and DeMaster, {Douglas P.} and Kareiva, {Peter M.}",
year = "1999",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98466.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1215--1219",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gray whales and the value of monitoring data in implementing the U.S. Endangered Species Act

AU - Gerber, Leah

AU - DeMaster, Douglas P.

AU - Kareiva, Peter M.

PY - 1999/10

Y1 - 1999/10

N2 - Many scientists lament the absence of data for endangered species and argue that more funds should be spent acquiring basic information about population trends. Using 19 years of abundance estimates for the eastern North Pacific gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus), we sampled subsets of the Original survey data to identify the number of years of data required to remove the population from the U.S. Endangered Species Act's (ESA) list of endangered and threatened wildlife. For any given duration of monitoring, we selected all possible combinations of consecutive counts. To incorporate variability in growth rates, we extracted a maximum likelihood estimator of growth rate and confidence interval about that growth rate on the assumption that the population changes can be approximated by a simple diffusion process with drift. We then applied a new approach to determine ESA status for each subset of survey data and found that a quantitative decision to delist is unambiguously supported by 11 years of data but is precariously uncertain with fewer than 10 years of data. The data needed to produce an unequivocal decision to delist gray whales cost the National Marine Fisheries Service an estimated U.S. $660,000, a surprisingly modest expense given the fact that delisting can greatly simplify regulatory constraints. This example highlights the value of population monitoring in administering the ESA and provides a compelling example of the utility of such information in identifying both imperiled and recovered species. The economic value of such data is that they provide the foundation for delisting, which could ultimately save much more money than the collection of the data would ever cost.

AB - Many scientists lament the absence of data for endangered species and argue that more funds should be spent acquiring basic information about population trends. Using 19 years of abundance estimates for the eastern North Pacific gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus), we sampled subsets of the Original survey data to identify the number of years of data required to remove the population from the U.S. Endangered Species Act's (ESA) list of endangered and threatened wildlife. For any given duration of monitoring, we selected all possible combinations of consecutive counts. To incorporate variability in growth rates, we extracted a maximum likelihood estimator of growth rate and confidence interval about that growth rate on the assumption that the population changes can be approximated by a simple diffusion process with drift. We then applied a new approach to determine ESA status for each subset of survey data and found that a quantitative decision to delist is unambiguously supported by 11 years of data but is precariously uncertain with fewer than 10 years of data. The data needed to produce an unequivocal decision to delist gray whales cost the National Marine Fisheries Service an estimated U.S. $660,000, a surprisingly modest expense given the fact that delisting can greatly simplify regulatory constraints. This example highlights the value of population monitoring in administering the ESA and provides a compelling example of the utility of such information in identifying both imperiled and recovered species. The economic value of such data is that they provide the foundation for delisting, which could ultimately save much more money than the collection of the data would ever cost.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032868487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032868487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98466.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98466.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032868487

VL - 13

SP - 1215

EP - 1219

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 5

ER -